A phase Ib study combining irinotecan with AZD1775, a selective WEE 1 kinase inhibitor, in RAS/RAF mutated metastatic colorectal cancer patients who progressed on first line therapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3627-TPS3627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deirdre Jill Cohen ◽  
Elda Grabocka ◽  
Dafna Bar-Sagi ◽  
Robert Godin ◽  
Lawrence P. Leichman

TPS3627 Background: Mutant KRAS tumors show a dependency on WT-H/N-Ras for activation of ATR/Chk1-mediated G2 DNA damage response (Grabocka, Cell, 2015). We have shown in vitro that the Wee1 kinase inhibitor AZD1775, which acts to abrogate the G2 DNA damage checkpoint and induces replication stress during S-phase, selectively sensitizes RAS/RAF mutant cells to the DNA damaging agent irinotecan. Up to 65% of metastatic colorectal cancers harbor RAS or BRAF mutations and these patients have limited treatment options following first line therapy. Methods: This is an open label, single-arm, phase Ib study using a modified 3+3 dose-escalation schedule with expansion cohort. Primary objective is to determine the MTD of AZD1775 in combination with irinotecan as 2nd-line therapy in patients with metastatic KRAS, NRAS or BRAF mutated colorectal cancer. Up to 18 patients will be enrolled in the dose escalation portion. Standard dose irinotecan is given on day 1 of every 2 week cycle. AZD1775 is administered PO twice daily for 3 to 5 days of each cycle, starting cycle 2. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is defined as the highest dose level at which ≤1 of 6 patients experience a dose limiting toxicity. Once the MTD is reached and/or recommended dose for expansion is determined, a dose expansion cohort of 14 patients will be enrolled. Secondary endpoints include characterizing the safety profile at the MTD, obtaining a preliminary estimate of efficacy for the combination (measured by overall response rate, progression-free and overall survival rates), and obtaining pharmacokinetic parameters. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies will be collected from the expansion cohort to determine: adequate target engagement of Wee1, changes in markers of DNA damage, TP53 mutation status, and changes in gene expression profiles in order to identify potential biomarkers of response. At February 2017, 2 patients have been enrolled on this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02906059. [Table: see text]

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. iii11-iii12
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Yosuke Kito ◽  
Hiroya Taniguchi ◽  
Yoshiki Horie ◽  
Takeshi Yamada ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1209-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Daniel Sargent ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Hans-Joachim Schmoll

Purpose Fluorouracil (FU)-leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin administered alone or in combination have proven effective in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Combination protocols using FU-LV with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin are currently regarded as standard first-line therapies in this disease. However, the importance of the availability of all three active cytotoxic agents, FU-LV, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, on overall survival (OS) has not yet been evaluated. Materials and Methods We analyzed data from seven recently published phase III trials in advanced CRC to correlate the percentage of patients receiving second-line therapy and the percentage of patients receiving all three agents with the reported median OS, using a weighted analysis. Results The reported median OS is significantly correlated with the percentage of patients who received all three drugs in the course of their disease (P = .0008) but not with the percentage of patients who received any second-line therapy (P = .19). In addition, the use of combination protocols as first-line therapy was associated with a significant improvement in median survival of 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.27 to 5.73 months; P = .0083). Conclusion Our results support the strategy of making these three active drugs available to all patients with advanced CRC who are candidates for such therapy to maximize OS. In addition, our findings suggest that, with the availability of effective salvage options, OS should no longer be regarded as the most appropriate end point by which to assess the efficacy of a palliative first-line treatment in CRC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document