Interim FDG-PET imaging during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: Correlation with pathologic response.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 175-175
Author(s):  
Daniel Tandberg ◽  
Julian C. Hong ◽  
Yunfeng Cui ◽  
Brad Ackerson ◽  
Brian G. Czito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Relative Reduction ◽  
Interim Pet ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Manual Contour ◽  
Pre Treatment

175 Background: In this prospective study we evaluated whether changes in metabolic tumor parameters on interim flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) performed during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer correlates with histopathologic tumor response. Methods: From February 2012 to February 2016, 60 patients with esophageal cancer underwent PET scans before therapy and after 30-36 Gy. Patients who underwent surgery after carboplatin/paclitaxel CRT were eligible for the current analysis. PET metrics of the primary site including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUV mean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were extracted from the pre-treatment and interim PET based on a manual contour and SUV 2.5 threshold. Patients were called histopathologic responders if they had a complete or near complete tumor response based on the modified Ryan scheme. Relative changes in PET metrics between pre-treatment and interim PET were compared between histopathologic responders and non-responders using the Mann-Whitney test and binary logistic regression. Results: Twenty-six patients were included in the analysis. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (n = 23). Eleven patients (42%) had a complete or near complete pathologic response to CRT (histopathologic responders). Changes in PET metrics from pre-treatment to interim PET based on the manual contour were not significantly different between responding and nonresponding tumors. The relative reduction of SUVmax (Mean ± SD) was 38.2% ± 28.4% for histopathologic responders and 27.9% ± 31.4% for non-responders. The relative reduction in MTV, SUV mean and TLG was 36.1% ± 26.2%, 23.5% ± 21.3%, and 49.3% ± 28.3% for histopathologic responders and 28.6% ± 32.0%, 11.8% ± 19.1%, and 33.1% ± 38.5% for histopathologic non-responders, respectively. When analyzed based on the SUV 2.5 threshold there continued to be no significant difference in PET metrics. Conclusions: In this pilot study we observed changes in metabolic tumor parameters on PET performed during CRT for esophageal cancer. However, these changes did not predict for histopathologic responders.

scholarly journals Addition of HER2 and CD44 to 18F-FDG PET–based clinico-radiomic models enhances prediction of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in esophageal cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roelof J. Beukinga ◽  
Da Wang ◽  
Arend Karrenbeld ◽  
Willemieke P. M. Dijksterhuis ◽  
Hette Faber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Biological Tumor Markers ◽  
Complementary Value

Abstract Objectives To assess the complementary value of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-related biological tumor markers to clinico-radiomic models in predicting complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in esophageal cancer patients. Methods Expression of HER2 was assessed by immunohistochemistry in pre-treatment tumor biopsies of 96 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Five other potentially active HER2-related biological tumor markers in esophageal cancer were examined in a sub-analysis on 43 patients. Patients received at least four of the five cycles of chemotherapy and full radiotherapy regimen followed by esophagectomy. Three reference clinico-radiomic models based on 18F-FDG PET were constructed to predict pathologic response, which was categorized into complete versus incomplete (Mandard tumor regression grade 1 vs. 2–5). The complementary value of the biological tumor markers was evaluated by internal validation through bootstrapping. Results Pathologic examination revealed 21 (22%) complete and 75 (78%) incomplete responders. HER2 and cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44), analyzed in the sub-analysis, were univariably associated with pathologic response. Incorporation of HER2 and CD44 into the reference models improved the overall performance (R2s of 0.221, 0.270, and 0.225) and discrimination AUCs of 0.759, 0.857, and 0.816. All models exhibited moderate to good calibration. The remaining studied biological tumor markers did not yield model improvement. Conclusions Incorporation of HER2 and CD44 into clinico-radiomic prediction models improved NCRT response prediction in esophageal cancer. These biological tumor markers are promising in initial response evaluation. Key Points • A multimodality approach, integrating independent genomic and radiomic information, is promising to improve prediction of γpCR in patients with esophageal cancer. • HER2 and CD44 are potential biological tumor markers in the initial work-up of patients with esophageal cancer. • Prediction models combining 18F-FDG PET radiomic features with HER2 and CD44 may be useful in the decision to omit surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

scholarly journals 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters for Predicting Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110246
Author(s):  
Seokmo Lee ◽  
Yunseon Choi ◽  
Geumju Park ◽  
Sunmi Jo ◽  
Sun Seong Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Background and Aims: This study evaluated the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with integrated computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) performed before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in esophageal cancer. Methods: We analyzed the prognosis of 50 non-metastatic squamous cell esophageal cancer (T1-4N0-2) patients who underwent CCRT with curative intent at Inje University Busan Paik Hospital and Haeundae Paik Hospital from 2009 to 2019. Median total radiation dose was 54 Gy (range 34-66 Gy). Our aim was to investigate the relationship between PET/CT values and prognosis. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The median follow-up period was 9.9 months (range 1.7-85.7). Median baseline maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) was 14.2 (range 3.2-27.7). After treatment, 29 patients (58%) showed disease progression. The 3-year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 24.2% and 54.5%, respectively. PFS was significantly lower ( P = 0.015) when SUVmax of initial PET/CT exceeded 10 (n = 22). However, OS did not reach a significant difference based on maximum SUV ( P = 0.282). Small metabolic tumor volume (≤14.1) was related with good PFS ( P = 0.002) and OS ( P = 0.001). Small total lesion of glycolysis (≤107.3) also had a significant good prognostic effect on PFS ( P = 0.009) and OS ( P = 0.025). In a subgroup analysis of 18 patients with follow-up PET/CT, the patients with SUV max ≤3.5 in follow-up PET/CT showed longer PFS ( P = 0.028) than those with a maximum SUV >3.5. Conclusion: Maximum SUV of PET/CT is useful in predicting prognosis of esophageal cancer patients treated with CCRT. Efforts to find more effective treatments for patients at high risk of progression are still warranted.

Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer assessed with CT and FDG-PET/CT – RECIST 1.1 vs. PERCIST 1.0

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soichi Odawara ◽  
Kazuhiro Kitajima ◽  
Takayuki Katsuura ◽  
Yasunori Kurahashi ◽  
Hisashi Shinohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Percist 1.0 ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document