What I wish I had known: Young breast cancer survivors reflect on their experiences after breast cancer surgery.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Shoshana M. Rosenberg ◽  
Mary Greaney ◽  
Andrea Farkas Patenaude ◽  
Meghan E Meyer ◽  
Ann H. Partridge

180 Background: Breast cancer (BC) surgery can have a profound impact on aspects of quality of life (QOL) particularly for young breast cancer survivors, given their life stage. Using a series of focus groups (FG), we explored post-surgical experiences of young survivors who had elected lumpectomy, unilateral or bilateral mastectomy. Methods: Women who had surgery for their stage 0-3 BC and who were 1-3 years from their diagnosis (dx) at age ≤ 40 were recruited to participate. We conducted 4 FG: 2 with women who had bilateral mastectomy, 2 with women who kept their contralateral breast. FG were recorded and transcribed with identifiers removed. FG transcripts were coded using NVivo, and emergent themes were identified by thematic content analysis. At the end of the FG, participants completed a demographic/medical history survey. Results: Of 20 participants (4-6 per FG), median age at dx was 37 yrs; 10% (2/20) identified as Hispanic; most (19/20) were married/partnered; 70% had Stage 1 (4/20) or 2 (10/20) disease. Almost all women who had mastectomies also had reconstruction. Emergent themes included: the unexpectedness of certain physical experiences post-surgery (e.g., surgical drains, pain, numbness), psychological impact of surgery (e.g., vulnerability, self image changes), and short and long-term adjustment to a “new normal”, irrespective of which surgery they had. While participants generally felt their doctors communicated key information about surgery and recovery, some expressed dissatisfaction with how this information was communicated, including feeling pressured to choose a particular surgical option. Conclusions: Young BC survivors have many physical and emotional concerns after BC surgery for which they may not feel prepared. Communicating balanced and relevant information prior to surgery about what to expect afterwards is essential and can potentially help survivors with their transition to a “new normal,” as they move from active treatment to survivorship. Informational resources and decision aids may enhance patient-doctor communication in this setting and help young survivors manage expectations surrounding short and longer-term physical and emotional effects after surgery.

JAMA Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 155 (11) ◽  
pp. 1035
Author(s):  
Shoshana M. Rosenberg ◽  
Laura S. Dominici ◽  
Shari Gelber ◽  
Philip D. Poorvu ◽  
Kathryn J. Ruddy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. S60
Author(s):  
L. Assogba ◽  
A. Mamguem Kamga ◽  
H. Costaz ◽  
C. Jankowski ◽  
M. Poillot ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. BMT02 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Wan ◽  
Isabelle Arès ◽  
Alexandre Gareau ◽  
Katherine A Collins ◽  
Sophie Lebel ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. S27
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Rossi ◽  
Giacomo Montagna ◽  
Olivia Pagani ◽  
Walter Weber ◽  
Uwe Güth ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106
Author(s):  
Samantha Rose Dewald ◽  
Loki Natarajan ◽  
Irene Su

106 Background: Fertility is important to many young breast cancer survivors (YBCS), who face difficult decisions on whether to undergo fertility preservation prior to treatment. Because few longitudinal data assessing decisional regret are available, the objectives of this study were to assess longitudinal changes in decisional regret on fertility preservation following breast cancer diagnosis; determine if fertility preservation treatment decisions are related to decreased decisional regret. Methods: From 3 academic breast cancer programs, 169 YBCS younger than age 45 were recruited at diagnosis between 2009 and 2012 and followed prospectively for ovarian function. Participants completed questionnaires on fertility preservation choices and the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) during study visits every 6 months for up to 5 years. DRS is scored 0 (no regret) to 100 (highest regret). DRS was dichotomized as none versus any decisional regret. Generalized linear models estimated the change in DRS over time and the association between patient characteristics and DRS. Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 38.7 (SD 4.8). Median total follow-up was 176 days (IQR 84 to 1415 days). Enrollment DRS was available for 89 women; 48% reported decisional regret about fertility preservation (median DRS=20). Participants worried about future fertility were more likely to report decisional regret (p=0.009). 31% underwent fertility preservation, but this was not associated with decisional regret (p=0.65). In repeated measures analysis for the entire cohort, no significant change in DRS occurred over this time period (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4-1.7). Worry about future fertility remained significantly associated with DRS over time (OR 55.1, 95% CI 7.7-395.1). Conclusions: In a cohort of YBCS, experiencing decisional regret about fertility preservation persists for years after diagnosis. Those worried about future fertility are more likely to experience decisional regret regarding fertility preservation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. E1-E11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Miyashita ◽  
Shinji Ohno ◽  
Akemi Kataoka ◽  
Eriko Tokunaga ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 169 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarsha Jones ◽  
Debra Duquette ◽  
Meghan Underhill ◽  
Chang Ming ◽  
Kari E. Mendelsohn-Victor ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Yue Zheng ◽  
Shari I. Gelber ◽  
Philip Poorvu ◽  
Kathryn J. Ruddy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document