scholarly journals Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 483-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Brown ◽  
Manmeet S. Ahluwalia ◽  
Osaama H. Khan ◽  
Anthony L. Asher ◽  
Jeffrey S. Wefel ◽  
...  

An estimated 20% of patients with cancer will develop brain metastases. Approximately 200,000 individuals in the United States alone receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) each year to treat brain metastases. Historically, the prognosis of patients with brain metastases has been poor; however, with new therapies, this is changing. Because patients are living longer following the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases, there has been rising concern about treatment-related toxicities associated with WBRT, including neurocognitive toxicity. In addition, recent clinical trials have raised questions about the use of WBRT. To better understand this rapidly changing landscape, this review outlines the treatment roles and toxicities of WBRT and alternative therapies for the management of brain metastases.

2007 ◽  
Vol 183 (11) ◽  
pp. 631-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Rades ◽  
Guenther Bohlen ◽  
Radka Lohynska ◽  
Theo Veninga ◽  
Lukas J. A. Stalpers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Karin Dieckmann ◽  
Harald Herrmann

SummaryBrain metastases (BM) are the most frequent intracranial tumors in adults. About 10–20% of the patients with cancer will develop them. Historically, most of the patients with brain metastases were treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). The intention was to control the metastases and to eliminate distant micrometastases. Randomized control trials showed no difference in survival in patients with single and oligometastases treated with WBRT compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). To avoid treatment-related toxicities with neurocognitive decline, indications for WBRT are changing. High precision therapy with SRS or postoperative stereotactic treatments have become increasingly important. Only in exceptional cases is WBRT still the treatment of choice.


Author(s):  
Dianne Hartgerink ◽  
Anna Bruynzeel ◽  
Danielle Eekers ◽  
Ans Swinnen ◽  
Coen Hurkmans ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The clinical value of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BM) is a matter of debate due to the significant side effects involved. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an attractive alternative treatment option that may avoid these side effects and improve local tumor control. We initiated a randomized trial (NCT02353000) to investigate whether quality of life is better preserved after SRS compared with WBRT in patients with multiple brain metastases. Methods Patients with 4 to 10 BM were randomized between the standard arm WBRT (total dose 20 Gy in 5 fractions) or SRS (single fraction or 3 fractions). The primary endpoint was the difference in quality of life (QOL) at three months post-treatment. Results The study was prematurely closed due to poor accrual. A total of 29 patients (13%) were randomized, of which 15 patients have been treated with SRS and 14 patients with WBRT. The median number of lesions were 6 (range, 4-9) and the median total treatment volume was 13.0 cc 3 (range, 1.8-25.9 cc 3). QOL at three months decreased in the SRS group by 0.1 (SD=0.2), compared to 0.2 (SD=0.2) in the WBRT group (p=0.23). The actuarial one-year survival rates were 57% (SRS) and 31% (WBRT) (p=0.52). The actuarial one-year brain salvage-free survival rates were 50% (SRS) and 78% (WBRT) (p=0.22). Conclusion In patients with 4 to 10 BM, SRS alone resulted in one-year survival for 57% of patients while maintaining quality of life. Due to the premature closure of the trial, no statistically significant differences could be determined.


CNS Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Macarena de la Fuente ◽  
Kathryn Beal ◽  
Richard Carvajal ◽  
Thomas J Kaley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document