Abstract
BACKGROUND
High expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in glioblastoma is associated with resistance to temozolomide, as tumor cells lacking MGMT activity are significantly more sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of temozolomide. The MGMT promoter methylation status (MGMTpms) is typically determined as MGMT-methylated or MGMT-unmethylated. Some single-center studies have reported results ranging from 70–95% detection rates using MRI. We aim to further validate these findings using a multi-institutional data set. We hypothesize that transfer learning based features when integrated via machine learning may lead to non-invasive determination of MGMTpms.
METHODS
A total of 270 patients were included across the 3 institutions (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP), Jefferson University Hospital (JUH); the TCIA). JUH and TCIA datasets comprised conventional modalities (T1,T2,T2-FLAIR,T1-Gd), whereas HUP dataset had additional modalities (DSC,DTI) as well. We used transfer learning and adapted a convolutional neural network (CNN) model pre-trained on 1.2 million 3-channel images of the ImageNet to extract deep learning features from the given images. A support vector machine multivariately integrated these features towards a non-invasive marker of MGMTpms.
RESULTS
The cross-validated accuracy of our MGMT marker in classifying the mutation status in individual patients was 86.95%, 81.56%, and 82.43%, respectively, in HUP, JUH, and TCIA. Our marker revealed MGMT-methylated tumors with lower neovascularization and cell density, when compared with MGMT-unmethylated tumors. MGMT-unmethylated tumors were found to be more lateralized to the right hemisphere, when compared with MGMT-methylated tumors.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that transfer learning features when integrated via machine learning allow robust prediction of MGMTpms on mpMRI acquired within multiple institutions. The proposed non-invasive MGMT marker may contribute to (i) MGMTpms determination for patients with inadequate tissue/inoperable tumors, (ii) stratification of patients into clinical trials, (iii) patient selection for targeted therapy, and (iv) personalized treatment planning.