DNA repair deficiency, genomic instability and immune profiling in a phase 1 study of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with veliparib, gemcitabine and radiotherapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4128-4128
Author(s):  
Richard Tuli ◽  
Nicholas N. Nissen ◽  
Simon Lo ◽  
Miranda Bryant ◽  
Arsen Osipov ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Kazuhiro Katayama ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Hironari Sueyoshi ◽  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
...  

261 Background: We conducted chemoradiotherapy of gemcitabine plus S-1, key drugs for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients were eligible for the study if they had received a histopathological diagnosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer and were diagnosed as unresectable by multiple clinicians including surgeons due to main arterial invasions and more. Radiation (RT) was perfomed for twenty-eight days continuously except Saturday, Sunday and National holiday in 1.8Gy once daily (total 50.4Gy). PTV was defined as GTV plus 10-15mm. Prophylactic irradiation to regional lymph nodes was not performed. Administration level of the anti-cancer drugs was referred to the following table. Results: A total of fifteen cases were enrolled to the phase I study from February, 2006 through May, 2007. RT was achieved in 13 of 15 cases (87%). Two cases of DLT occurred in level 2 (two cases of emesis) while three did in level 3 (one case of emesis and two of neutropenia of grade 4). We decided level 3 as MTD and level 2 as recommended dose. The overall response rate (more than PR) was 33.3% (5 in 15 cases) and tumor-control (more than SD) was achieved in 13 of 15 cases (87%). The one-year and two-year survival rate was 86.7% and 44.4%, respectively. Conclusions: We conducted the phase 1 study of chemoradiotherapy with two key drugs of pancreatic cancer and achieved the recommended dose in this phase I study. Ongoing study We have already finished the enrollment of 110 cases for a phase II randomized allocated study, comparing the chemoradiotherapy of administration dose decided in this phase 1 study with the combination therapy of gemcitabine plus S-1. Now we are carefully following the patients to compare two-year survival rate as a primary endpoint in phase II study. Clinical trial information: NCT01430052.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15798-e15798
Author(s):  
Suhaib Bajwa ◽  
Thomas A Odeny ◽  
Anwaar Saeed ◽  
Anup Kasi

e15798 Background: Understanding survival outcomes of various pathogenic mutations helps guide treatment decision making for patients. Classic pancreatic cancer mutations such as KRAS and TP53 have well documented survival outcomes while other mutations leading to DNA repair deficiency do not have well understood survival outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated survival outcomes of 70 pancreatic cancer patients who had their cancers genetically profiled by NGS methods. Patients with DNA repair deficiency harbored mutations in genes such as BRCA1 (1 Pts), BRCA2 (8 Pts), ATM (5 Pts), NBN (1 Pt), and BRIP1 (1 Pt). We compared baseline characteristics, tumor stage and clinical outcomes between patients with DNA repair deficiency versus DNA repair proficient cancer patients. Comparative survival analysis between the two groups was performed using Kaplan-Meir methods. Results: Baseline characteristics for all patients are recorded in (Table). Median OS is 24 months for DNA repair proficient group and 20 months for DNA repair deficient group. A comparison of Kaplan-Meir survival curves between the two groups yielded a p-value of 0.72. This is most likely due to sample size and different chemotherapy regimens which make it hard to retrospectively compare patient groups. Conclusions: Patients with mutated DNA repair genes did not have significantly worse survival. We are designing a clinical trial utilizing a PARP inhibitor, for these patients in order to better control for all factors in order to better ascertain any survival differences between the two groups. PARP inhibitor will create multiple single strand breaks which cancer cells deficient in DNA repair genes cannot repair and thus trigger cancer cell death[Table: see text]


EBioMedicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Tuli ◽  
Stephen L Shiao ◽  
Nicholas Nissen ◽  
Mourad Tighiouart ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. DeWitt ◽  
Kumar Sandrasegaran ◽  
Bert O'Neil ◽  
Michael G. House ◽  
Nicholas J. Zyromski ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document