Novel nomograms for castration-resistant prostate cancer and survival outcome in patients with de novo bone-metastatic prostate cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 336-336
Author(s):  
Jinge Zhao ◽  
Guangxi Sun ◽  
Banghua Liao ◽  
Xingming Zhang ◽  
Pengfei Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Predictive Models ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Predictive Parameters ◽  
Castration Resistant

336 Background: Treatments for de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) are evolving. However predictive models for this subset of the population are still lacking. The aim of this study is to develop nomograms to predict the incidence of castration resistant PCa (CRPC) and overall survival (OS) for de novo mPCa patients. Methods: Data from 449 de novo mPCa patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into either the training or the validation cohort. Predictive factors were selected by Cox-proportional model and further used for building predictive models. The outcomes were incidence of CRPC and OS. Results: Predictive parameters included: Gleason Score (GS), intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), ECOG status, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), hemoglobin (HGB) and prostate specific antigen (PSA). IDC-P and GS were the strongest prognosticators for both the incidence of CRPC and OS. Nomograms for predicting CRPC and OS had an internal validated C-index of 0.762 and 0.723, respectively. Based on the beta-coefficients of the final model, risk classification systems were constructed. For those with favorable-, intermediate- and poor-prognosis, the median time to CRPC was 62.6, 28.0 and 13.0 months (P<0.001), and the median OS was not reached, 55.0 and 33.0 months, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions: We developed two novel nomograms to predict the incidence of CRPC and OS for de novo mPCa patients. These tools may assist physicians’ decision-making and design of clinical trials.

scholarly journals Metasztatikus hormonérzékeny prosztatadaganat korszerű kezelése

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (41) ◽  
pp. 1664-1671
Author(s):  
Zsófia Küronya ◽  
Krisztina Bíró ◽  
Lajos Géczi ◽  
Anikó Maráz
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Radium 223 ◽  
Sensitive Phase ◽  
Hormone Sensitive ◽  
To Receive

Abstract: The treatment of metastatic prostate cancer can be divided into two pathophysiological phases: hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant phases. Huggins’ observation in the year 1941, which was awarded with the Nobel Prize in 1966, has a key role in treatment during the hormone-sensitive phase, stating that if the testicles are removed, the size of the prostate cancer decreases. Inducing androgen deprivation, i.e., testosterone depletion is the basic treatment of metastatic prostate cancer that patients have to receive life-long. In the past eight years, five new agents have been approved besides docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: sipuleucel-T, cabazitaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and radium-223. With the sequential application of these agents, significant improvement can be achieved in survival. Besides the latest developments, the hormone-sensitive phase has become the focus of attention, especially in the treatment of patients with de novo metastases and poor prognosis. Many studies have proven the outstanding efficacy of adding early docetaxel and abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy. The authors give a detailed overview of clinical studies leading to a paradigm change in treatment during the hormone-sensitive phase, and call attention to the difficulties encountered in Hungarian practice. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(41): 1664–1671.

scholarly journals Treatment of nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: focus on second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Martin Bögemann ◽  
Kazuhiro Suzuki ◽  
Neal Shore
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Conventional Imaging ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Consensus Statements

Abstract Background Nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is defined as a rising prostate-specific antigen concentration, despite castrate levels of testosterone with ongoing androgen-deprivation therapy or orchiectomy, and no detectable metastases by conventional imaging. Patients with nmCRPC progress to metastatic disease and are at risk of developing cancer-related symptoms and morbidity, eventually dying of their disease. While patients with nmCRPC are generally asymptomatic from their disease, they are often older and have chronic comorbidities that require long-term concomitant medication. Therefore, careful consideration of the benefit–risk profile of potential treatments is required. Methods In this review, we will discuss the rationale for early treatment of patients with nmCRPC to delay metastatic progression and prolong survival, as well as the factors influencing this treatment decision. We will focus on oral pharmacotherapy with the second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, and the importance of balancing the clinical benefit they offer with potential adverse events and the consequential impact on quality of life, physical capacity, and cognitive function. Results and conclusions While the definition of nmCRPC is well established, the advent of next-generation imaging techniques capable of detecting hitherto undetectable oligometastatic disease in patients with nmCRPC has fostered debate on the criteria that inform the management of these patients. However, despite these developments, published consensus statements have maintained that the absence of metastases on conventional imaging suffices to guide such therapeutic decisions. In addition, the prolonged metastasis-free survival and recently reported positive overall survival outcomes of the three second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors have provided further evidence for the early use of these agents in patients with nmCRPC in order to delay metastases and prolong survival. Here, we discuss the benefit–risk profiles of apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide based on the data available from their pivotal clinical trials in patients with nmCRPC.

Bone modifying agents in veterans with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6582-6582
Author(s):  
Jordan Bauman ◽  
Kyle Kumbier ◽  
Jennifer A. Burns ◽  
Jordan Sparks ◽  
Phoebe A. Tsao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Veterans Health ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Unit Increase

6582 Background: Skeletal related events (SREs) are a known complication for the 80% of men with metastatic prostate cancer who have bone metastases. Previous studies have demonstrated that bone modifying agents (BMAs) such as zoledronic acid and denosumab reduce SREs in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have bone metastases and are now recommended by national guidelines. We sought to investigate factors associated with use of BMAs in Veterans with CRPC across the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: Using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, consisting of aggregated medical record data from 130 facilities, we used an algorithm previously published to identify men with a diagnosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) based on rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels while on androgen deprivation therapy and who received systemic treatment for CRPC with one of the commonly used therapies: abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, ketoconazole between 2010 and 2017. To account for clustering among facilities, we used a multilevel multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of patient and disease-specific variables on the odds of a patient receiving a BMA after they started treatment for CRPC. Results: Of 4,998 patients with CRPC in our cohort, 2223 (44%) received either zoledronic acid or denosumab at some point after they were initiated on treatment for CRPC. After adjusting for other variables and accounting for a facility, the odds of receiving a BMA decreased by 3% for every additional year of age (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.98), and decreased significantly with increasing comorbid conditions (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.72-0.98 for Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] of 1; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.81 for CCI 2+). Patients who were Black had 25% lower odds of receiving a BMA than patients who were White (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65-0.87). PSA at time of CRPC treatment start had a small but not significant effect on receipt of a BMA (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08) for every unit increase of PSA on the log scale. PSA doubling time was not associated with receipt of a BMA. The presence of a diagnosis code for bone metastases was far lower than expected in this cohort of patients with CRPC (40.7%), and thus was not included in the model. We did not expect the presence of bone metastases to vary significantly among the other independent variables. Conclusions: Despite most patients with CRPC historically having bone metastases, less than half of patients with CRPC received a BMA. Patients who are older, had more comorbidities, or were Black were less likely to receive a BMA after starting treatment for CRPC. Understanding factors that lead to different patterns of treatment can guide initiatives toward more guideline-concordant care.

Sex Hormones and Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Auchus ◽  
Nima Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prostate Cancer Research ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Androgen Independent ◽  
Transition Studies

The prostate is an androgen-dependent organ that develops only in male mammals. Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. Metastatic prostate cancer initially retains its androgen dependence, and androgen-deprivation therapy often leads to disease control; however, the cancer inevitably progresses despite treatment as castration-resistant prostate cancer, the lethal form of the disease. Although it was assumed that the cancer became androgen independent during this transition, studies over the last two decades have shown that these tumors evade treatment via mechanisms that augment acquisition of androgens from circulating precursors, increase sensitivity to androgens and androgen precursors, bypass the androgen receptor, or a combination of these mechanisms. This review summarizes the history of prostate cancer research leading to the contemporary view of androgen dependence for prostate cancers and the current treatment approaches based on this modern paradigm.

scholarly journals Three-month early change in prostate-specific antigen levels as a predictive marker for overall survival during hormonal therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shotaro Nakanishi ◽  
Masato Goya ◽  
Mitsuyoshi Tamaki ◽  
Takuma Oshiro ◽  
Seiichi Saito
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Pretreatment Level ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Hormone Sensitive

Abstract Objective: To date, there are no useful markers for predicting the prognosis of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We evaluated the effect of early changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) progression and overall survival (OS) in mHSPC patients. Results: In 71 primary mHSPC patients treated with ADT, the median times to CRPC and OS were 15 months and 92 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a Gleason score of ≥8 (p = 0.004), an extent of disease value (EOD) of ≥2 (p = 0.004), and a 3-month PSA level >1% of the pretreatment level (p = 0.017) were independent predictors of shorter time to CRPC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was feasible at 0.822. For OS, a 3-month PSA level >1% of the pretreatment level was an independent predictor of time to CRPC (p = 0.004).Three factors were independent predictors of shorter time to CRPC. A 3-month PSA level >1% of the pretreatment level correlated with poor a prognosis.

scholarly journals Combined CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with increased myeloid and neutrophil immune subsets in the bone microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e002919
Author(s):  
Sumit K Subudhi ◽  
Bilal A Siddiqui ◽  
Ana M Aparicio ◽  
Shalini S Yadav ◽  
Sreyashi Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Microenvironment ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Measurable Disease

BackgroundImmune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has low response rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in part due to few T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration but induces upregulation of PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) within the prostate TME. Combined anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 can partly overcome this adaptive resistance and was recently shown to augment responses in patients with mCRPC with measurable disease. Although bone is the most common site of metastasis in prostate cancer, patients with bone-predominant disease are frequently excluded from trials because they lack measurable disease, which limits assessment of disease progression and tissue sampling. We therefore designed this study to investigate combined ICT in mCRPC to bone.HypothesisCombined anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) plus anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) is safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm pilot study, men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone received tremelimumab (75 mg intravenous) plus durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) every 4 weeks (up to four doses), followed by durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) maintenance every 4 weeks (up to nine doses). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and maximal PSA decline.ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated between August 8, 2017 and March 28, 2019. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 11 patients (42%), with no grade 4 or 5 events. TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in three patients (12%). PSA decline ≥50% occurred in three patients (12%). Six patients (24%) achieved stable disease for >6 months. At a median follow-up of 43.6 months, median rPFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9 to 5.7), and median overall survival was 28.1 months (95% CI: 14.5 to 37.3). Post-treatment evaluation of the bone microenvironment revealed transcriptional upregulation in myeloid and neutrophil immune subset signatures and increased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints.ConclusionsTremelimumab plus durvalumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone, with potential activity in a small number of patients as measured by rPFS. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade with therapies targeting the myeloid compartment or other inhibitory immune receptors may be necessary to overcome mechanisms of resistance within prostate bone microenvironment.Trial registration numberNCT03204812.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document