Implementing strain imaging to identify early childhood cancer survivors at risk for cardiovascular disease.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23070-e23070
Author(s):  
Wendy Bottinor ◽  
Justin Godown ◽  
Gary Coburn ◽  
Jonathan Soslow ◽  
Scott C. Borinstein

e23070 Background: In patients receiving active chemotherapy, myocardial strain has prognostic utility for risk of subsequent cardiomyopathy. We hypothesized a decrement in strain in early off-treatment childhood cancer survivors (CCS) is prognostic for developing cardiomyopathy. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed in 22 CCS. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) were assessed at baseline and on the first end-of-treatment study with adequate imaging quality. Parametric methods assessed the association between changes in GLS/GCS and cardiovascular outcomes. Results: All CCS had normal echocardiograms at baseline and on the first end-of-treatment study . On long-term follow up 5/22 developed echocardiographic abnormalities defined as either left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% (n = 4) and/or left ventricular mass Z score < -2.0 (n = 4). Mean age at diagnosis was (mean ± SEM) 13.0 ± 1.3 and 10.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.37 for those without and with long-term abnormalities respectively. Patients who developed long-term echocardiographic abnormalities had a greater decrement in GCS between baseline and fist end-of-treatment echocardiograms (-6.9 ± 0.9% vs -0.7 ± 1.2%, p = 0.011) and a trend towards greater decrement in GLS (-1.5 ± 1.3% vs 1.2 ± 0.7%, p = 0.069). In early off-therapy CCS an absolute change in GCS of 7% was associated with subsequent cardiovascular dysfunction within 10 years. Conclusions: Change in GCS of 7% or greater from baseline to first end-of-treatment echocardiogram may identify CCS at risk for cardiomyopathy on long-term follow up and offer a window for early intervention. Strain imaging may provide an early method of identifying CCS at higher risk for developing cardiomyopathy on long-term follow up. These survivors may benefit from increased surveillance or early intervention with cardioprotective therapies.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Otth ◽  
Patrick Wechsler ◽  
Sibylle Denzler ◽  
Henrik Koehler ◽  
Katrin Scheinemann

Abstract Background The successful transition of childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) from pediatric to adult long-term follow-up care is a critical phase, and determining the right time point can be challenging. We assessed the feasibility of the use of existing transition readiness tools in the context of the Swiss health care system, assessed partly transition readiness in Swiss CCSs, and compared our findings with Canadian CCSs for which these tools were originally developed. Methods We officially translated the Cancer Worry Scale (CWS) and Self-Management Skill Scale (SMSS) into German and integrated them into this cross-sectional study. We included CCSs attending the long-term follow-up (LTFU) clinic in the Division of Oncology-Hematology, Department of Pediatrics, Kantonsspital Aarau. We used descriptive statistics to describe transition readiness. Results We randomly recruited 50 CCSs aged ≥18 years at participation. The CCSs had a median CWS score of 62 (interquartile range 55–71), indicating a moderate level of cancer-related worry. Despite high self-management skills, some answers showed a dependency of CCSs on their parents. Our experience shows that the CWS and SMSS are easy for Swiss CCSs to use, understand, and complete. The interpretation of the results must take differences in health care systems between countries into account. Conclusions The translated CWS and SMSS are appropriate additional measures to assess transition readiness in CCSs. These scales can be used longitudinally to find the individual time point for transition and the completion by CCSs enables the health care team to individualize the transition process and to support the CCSs according to their individual needs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morven C. Brown ◽  
Gillian A. Levitt ◽  
Eva Frey ◽  
Edit Bárdi ◽  
Riccardo Haupt ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (suppl 3) ◽  
pp. iii150.4-iii150
Author(s):  
Nicky Thorp ◽  
Katherine Knighting ◽  
Lucy Bray ◽  
James Hayden ◽  
Laura Elder ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (11) ◽  
pp. 1723-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Frobisher ◽  
◽  
Adam Glaser ◽  
Gill A Levitt ◽  
David J Cutter ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. e26243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milanthy S. Pourier ◽  
Annelies M. C. Mavinkurve-Groothuis ◽  
Jacqueline Loonen ◽  
Jos P. M. Bökkerink ◽  
Nel Roeleveld ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 131-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Signorelli ◽  
Claire E. Wakefield ◽  
Joanna E. Fardell ◽  
W. Hamish B. Wallace ◽  
Eden G. Robertson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cárceles-Álvarez ◽  
J.A. Ortega-García ◽  
J.L. Fuster-Soler ◽  
G.A. Rivera-Pagán ◽  
M. Bermúdez-Cortés ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9566-9566
Author(s):  
K. Devine ◽  
J. R. Andolina ◽  
N. Murray ◽  
G. R. Morrow ◽  
O. J. Sahler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document