Outcome analysis of chemotherapy duration for resected stage I-II and unresected stage III pancreatic cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 375-375
Author(s):  
Sung Jun Ma ◽  
Austin J Iovoli ◽  
Kavitha M Prezzano ◽  
Gregory Hermann ◽  
Lucas M Serra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Resected Stage

375 Background: For resected early-stage pancreatic cancer, RTOG 9704 has evaluated the outcome of 3 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy (C) followed by chemoradiation (CRT) and post-CRT C. For locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a recent literature review showed that the typical duration for induction C is between 1 and 6 months prior to CRT. The ideal duration of C prior to CRT remains unclear. This National Cancer Database (NCDB) study was performed to identify the optimal duration of C prior to CRT in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: The NCDB was queried for primary stage I-II, cT1-3N0-1M0, resected and stage III, cT4N0-1M0, unresected pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with C+CRT (2004-2015). Cohorts I-II and III included stage I-II and stage III cases, respectively. In each cohort, the patients were stratified by the short (short C) and long duration (long C) of chemotherapy based on their median durations (70 and 90 days between the onset of chemotherapy and radiation for cohorts I-II and III, respectively). Baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were examined. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards method, and propensity score matching were used. Results: Among 1,577 patients, cohort I-II had 839 patients (n = 409 with short C, n = 430 with long C) and cohort III had 738 patients (n = 360 with short C, n = 378 with long C). Median follow-up was 39.5 months and 24.3 months for cohorts I-II and III, respectively. The long C group showed improved OS in the multivariable analysis in both cohort I-II (HR 0.72, p < 0.001) and cohort III (HR 0.83, p = 0.025). Using 1:1 propensity score matching, a total of 610 patients for cohort I-II and 542 patients for cohort III were matched. After matching, long C remained statistically significant for improved OS compared with short C in both cohort I-II (median OS 26.1 vs 21.9 months, p = 0.003) and cohort III (median OS 16.7 vs 14.2 months, p = 0.021). Conclusions: Our NCDB study using propensity score matched analysis showed a survival benefit in the use of longer duration chemotherapy compared to shorter duration chemotherapy for both resected stage I-II and unresected stage III pancreatic cancer.

Comparison of adjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, and chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation for resected stage I-II pancreatic cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 372-372
Author(s):  
Sung Jun Ma ◽  
Gregory Hermann ◽  
Kavitha M Prezzano ◽  
Lucas M Serra ◽  
Austin J Iovoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Forest Plot

372 Background: Prior National Cancer Database (NCDB) studies have demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit for adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) compared to chemotherapy alone. Given the more recent adoption of postoperative chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation (C+CRT), this NCDB analysis evaluates the clinical outcomes of C+CRT compared to CRT alone or adjuvant chemotherapy alone (C) for resected pancreatic cancer. Methods: The NCDB was queried for primary stage I-II, cT1-3N0-1M0, resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with adjuvant C, CRT, or C+CRT (2004-2015). Patients treated with C+CRT were compared with those treated with C (cohort C) or with CRT (cohort CRT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Baseline patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards method, forest plot, and propensity score matching were used. Results: Among 5667 patients (n = 3031 for C, n = 1307 for CRT, n = 1329 for C+CRT), median follow-up was 34.7 months, 45.2 months, and 39.7 months for the C, CRT, and C+CRT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariable analysis for all patients, C (HR 1.31, p < 0.001) and CRT (HR 1.24, p < 0.001) were associated with worse mortality compared to C+CRT. Treatment interactions were seen among pathologically node positive disease. C+CRT was favored in 1-3 (HR 0.74, p < 0.001) and 4+ (HR 0.75, p < 0.001) positive lymph node disease when compared to C or CRT alone, but none of the treatment options were significantly favored in node negative disease (HR 0.96, p = 0.67). Using 1:1 propensity score matching, 2152 patients for cohort C and 1774 patients for cohort CRT were matched. C+CRT remained significant for improved OS for both cohort C (median OS 23.3 vs 20.0 months, p < 0.001) and cohort CRT (median OS 23.4 vs 20.8 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This NCDB study using propensity score matched analysis demonstrates an OS benefit for C+CRT compared to C or CRT alone following surgical resection of pancreatic cancer. Most of this benefit is in patients with positive lymph nodes.

Comparison of outcomes in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conventionally fractionated radiation: An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 366-366
Author(s):  
Jim Zhong ◽  
Kirtesh R. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey M. Switchenko ◽  
Theresa Wicklin Gillespie ◽  
Richard John Cassidy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Fractionated Radiation ◽  
Conventionally Fractionated

366 Background: As systemic therapy has improved for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), efforts to improve local control have become critical. While conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) has more recently shown a limited role in LAPC, stereotactic body irradiation (SBRT) is an emerging approach that delivers higher doses of radiation therapy, to small volumes, over a much shorter period of time. With no studies to date comparing SBRT to CFRT for LAPC, we utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate these two modalities. Methods: Using the NCDB, patients with AJCC clinic cT2-4, N0-1, M0 adenocarcinoma of the pancreas diagnosed from 2004-2013 were analyzed. Radiation therapy delivered at 2 Gy per fraction or less was deemed CFRT, and 4 Gy or more per fraction was considered SBRT to allow inclusion of practice variations. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were performed with overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Propensity score matching was employed to reduce treatment selection bias. Results: Among 8,450 patients, 7,819 (92.5%) were treated with CFRT, and 631 (7.5%) underwent SBRT. The median dose per fraction and number of fractions for CFRT and SBRT cohorts were 1.8 Gy per fraction in 28 fractions and 8 Gy per fraction in 5 fractions, respectively. Using propensity score matching, 988 patients were matched, with 494 patients in each cohort. Within the propensity-matched cohorts, the median OS was higher with SBRT (13.9 vs. 10.7 months), and 2-year OS of 21.5% and 15.9% for the SBRT and CFRT groups, respectively ( p = 0.0014). Multivariable analysis confirmed SBRT was a significant predictor for OS (Hazard ratio:0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.93, p = 0.001). Additionally, pancreatoduodenectomy, low comorbidity index, chemotherapy use, and node negative disease also positively impacted survival. Conclusions: SBRT appears to be associated with an improved OS compared to CFRT for LAPC. Further prospective studies investigating these hypothesis-generating results are warranted.

scholarly journals Duration of chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation affects survival outcomes for resected stage I‐II or unresected stage III pancreatic cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 4110-4123
Author(s):  
Sung J. Ma ◽  
Austin J. Iovoli ◽  
Gregory M. Hermann ◽  
Kavitha M. Prezzano ◽  
Anurag K. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Resected Stage

Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Real World: Population-Based Practices and Effectiveness

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 3409-3414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika K. Krzyzanowska ◽  
Jane C. Weeks ◽  
Craig C. Earle
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Combined Modality Therapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
World Population ◽  
Propensity Score Methods

Purpose: To evaluate the use and effectiveness of cancer-directed therapy in elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database to perform a retrospective cohort study in 1,696 patients diagnosed with LAPC between 1991 and 1996. We calculated cancer-directed treatment use rates, then used logistic regression to identify patient and health system factors that were associated with receipt of treatment. Effectiveness of treatment was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score methods. Results: In our cohort, 44% of patients received some form of cancer-directed therapy (24% radiation with concurrent chemotherapy, 13% radiation alone, and 7% chemotherapy alone). Older age, lower socioeconomic status, presence of comorbid illness, no care in a teaching hospital, and residence in the western United States were associated with a lower likelihood of receiving treatment (P ≤ .05). Among those treated, younger age and certain geographic locations were the only predictors of receiving combined-modality therapy. The adjusted hazard ratio for death associated with any treatment in the Cox model was 0.53 (P < .0001). Effectiveness estimates obtained using propensity score methods were similar. Conclusion: This analysis supports the effectiveness of cancer-directed treatment in elderly patients with LAPC, but use is low. Receipt of treatment is strongly correlated with non–disease-related factors, especially sociodemographic characteristics, indicating possible disparities in access to care.

scholarly journals Irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A large cohort propensity score analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Chaobin He ◽  
Shengping Li
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Combination Method ◽  
Local Progression

117 Background: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a dismal prognosis with the standard chemotherapy and the local progression contributed to nearly one-third of deaths of these patients. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a local destructive method which is feasible for the treatment of LAPC. The aim of this study was to evaluate IRE combined with chemotherapy as a new treatment and compared its efficacy with that of chemotherapy alone for LAPC patients. Methods: Data of LAPC patients who received chemotherapy combined IRE or not were extracted from database of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). The efficacy of these two treatments was compared based on data analyzed with propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Results: In all, 3515 LAPC patients from SEER database were included, including 3348 patients received chemotherapy and 167 patients received combination therapy of IRE and chemotherapy. Additionally, 36 patients who received IRE plus chemotherapy and another 96 patients who received chemotherapy from the SYSUCC were included. After PSM, survival rates were compared between two groups. Patients in combination group achieved better survival than those in chemotherapy group [SEER: overall survival (OS), 16.0 months (95% CI, 12.0-21.0) vs 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-11.6), P < 0.001; SYSUCC: OS, 21.6 months (95% CI, 17.8-25.3) vs 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.4-9.5), P = 0.006]. Moreover, similar better results in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were observed in patients who received combination therapy compared with chemotherapy alone. IRE combined with chemotherapy was shown as a favorable factor for OS, CSS and PFS in LAPC patients. Conclusions: Patients with LAPC who received IRE combined with chemotherapy had better survival compared with those after chemotherapy treatment alone. This combination method may be a more suitable way of treatment for patients with LAPC.

scholarly journals Complete Responses after Hyperthermic Ablation by Ultrasound Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Plus Systemic Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Joan Vidal-Jove ◽  
Marta Garcia-Bernal ◽  
Eloi Perich ◽  
Manuel Alvarez del Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Pancreatic Tumors ◽  
Clinical Responses

We describe results in unresectable pancreatic tumors treated with USgHIFU hyperthermia ablation plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods. Thirty two cases of nonresectable pancreatic tumors were treated from March 2010 to March 2012, and all of them underwent systemic chemotherapy. Clinical responses (thermal ablation achieved) were measured by image techniques. There were 23 stage III cases and 9 stage IV cases. Complications were also analyzed. Results. Clinical responses (ablation obtained) were 82% in all cases, sustained at 8 weeks of the procedure. We obtained 8 complete responses (25%) at the end of the combined treatment, 7 from stage III patients and 1 from stage IV. Major complications included (1) severe pancreatitis with GI bleeding and (2) skin burning grade III that required plastic surgery. No deaths were registered. Median survival was 12.5 month (6 months–2.5 year). Conclusion. HIFU plus SC is a potentially effective and safe modality for the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer.

scholarly journals Optimizing Patient Selection for Irreversible Electroporation of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Analyses of Survival

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Woeste ◽  
Khaleel D. Wilson ◽  
Edward J. Kruse ◽  
Matthew J. Weiss ◽  
John D. Christein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Irreversible Electroporation ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Selection For

BackgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) has emerged as a viable consolidative therapy after induction chemotherapy, in which this combination has improved overall survival of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Optimal timing and patient selection for irreversible electroporation remains a clinically unmet need. The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative factors that may assist in predicting progression-free and overall survival following IRE.MethodsA multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database was reviewed for patients with LAPC treated with induction chemotherapy followed by open-technique irreversible electroporation from 7/2015-5/2019. RECIST 1.1 criteria were used to assess tumor response and radiological progression. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox multivariable regression analyses.Results187 LAPC patients (median age 62 years range, 21 – 91, 65% men, 35% women) were treated with IRE. Median PFS was 21.7 months and median OS from diagnosis was 25.5 months. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 61 (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.21-0.78, p&lt;0.008) and no prior radiation (HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.94, p=0.03) were positive predictors of OS after IRE. Age ≤ 61(HR 0.53, 95%CI, 0.28-.99, p=0.046) and FOLFIRINOX followed by gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy (HR 0.37,95%CI 0.15-0.89, p=0.027) predicted prolonged PFS after IRE. Abnormal CA19-9 values at the time of surgery negatively impacted both OS (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.28-4.72, p&lt;0.007) and PFS (HR 2.192, 95%CI 1.143-4.201, p=0.018) following IRE.ConclusionsAge, CA 19-9 response, avoidance of pre-IRE radiation, and FOLFIRINOX plus gemcitabine/abraxane induction chemotherapy are prominent factors to consider when referring or selecting LAPC patients to undergo IRE.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document