Lurbinectedin (LUR) in combination with Irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Updated results from a phase Ib-II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3514-3514
Author(s):  
Santiago Ponce Aix ◽  
Gregory Michael Cote ◽  
Alejandro Falcon Gonzalez ◽  
Juan Manuel Sepulveda ◽  
Elizabeth Jimenez Aguilar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Levels

3514 Background: LUR is a novel agent that exerts antitumor activity through inhibition of trans-activated transcription and modulation of tumor microenvironment. Preclinical synergism/additivity in combination with IRI has been reported, thus prompting the conduct of this clinical trial. Methods: Phase Ib-II trial to evaluate escalating doses of LUR on Day (D) 1 plus a fixed dose of IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 every 3 weeks (q3w) in pts with advanced solid tumors (+/- G-CSF, if dose-limiting toxicities [DLTs] were neutropenia). Starting dose was LUR 1.0 m/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2. Results: 77 pts have been treated to date at 5 dose levels, 51 of them at the recommended dose (RD). Baseline characteristics of all 77 pts were: 48% females, 68% ECOG PS=1; median age 57 years (range, 19-75 years); median of 2 prior lines (range, 0−4 lines). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was LUR 2.4 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF, and the RD was LUR 2.0 mg/m2 + IRI 75 mg/m2 with G-CSF. DLTs in Cycle 1 occurred in 2/3 evaluable pts at the MTD and 3/13 evaluable pts at the RD, and comprised omission of IRI D8 infusion due to grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia (n=3 pts) or G2-4 thrombocytopenia (n=2). At the RD (n=51), common G1/2 non-hematological toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia and neuropathy. G3 non-hematological toxicities (diarrhea 10%, fatigue 10%) and G3/4 hematological abnormalities (neutropenia 49%, thrombocytopenia 10%) were transient. Conclusions: The combination of LUR and IRI had acceptable tolerance, with no unexpected toxicities. Transient myelosuppression was dose-limiting. The RD is LUR 2.0 mg/m2 on D1 + IRI 75 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 q3w with G-CSF. Antitumor activity was observed at the RD in SCLC pts, as well as in endometrial carcinoma pts. Hints of activity were also observed in STS pts. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02611024 . [Table: see text]

Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous VEGF Trap plus irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin (I-LV5FU2) in a combination phase I clinical trial of patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13161-13161 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Rixe ◽  
C. Verslype ◽  
J. B. Méric ◽  
S. Tejpar ◽  
J. Bloch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Colon Cancers ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Vegf Trap

13161 Background: VEGF Trap is a potent angiogenesis inhibitor comprising portions of human VEGF receptor VEGFR1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR2 (Flk-1) extracellular domains fused to the Fc portion of human IgG. VEGF Trap binds VEGF and neutralizes all VEGF-A isoforms plus placental growth factor. I-LV5FU2 is an approved chemotherapy regimen for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of VEGF Trap plus I-LV5FU2 administered intravenously. Methods: Successive cohorts of 3–6 patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory solid tumors received intravenous VEGF Trap plus I-LV5FU2 every 2 weeks. Study endpoints included safety, PK, and immunogenicity. Antitumor activity was assessed by CT scan. Results: Ten pts (3 male/7 female), median age 59 (34–67), ECOG PS 0/1/2: 8/2/0, with a variety of advanced solid tumors, including 5 colorectal and 2 ovarian, have received a total of 50 cycles of VEGF Trap plus I-LV5FU2 across 2 VEGF Trap dose levels (2.0 mg/kg, 4.0 mg/kg) to date. Only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (G3 proteinuria >2 wks with normal plasma creatinine levels) has been encountered so far (4.0 mg/kg, Cycle 2). This pt also had controlled G2 HTN (renal biopsy pending). No other G3/4 VEGF Trap-related AEs have been reported so far. Preliminary free VEGF Trap clearance was 15.4 mL/kg/day. Three pts (synovial sarcoma, ovarian and colon cancers) achieved partial responses. Conclusions: VEGF Trap may be safely combined with I-LV5FU2 at the dose levels studied. Preliminary free VEGF Trap clearance did not differ significantly from that seen with single-agent exposure; chemotherapy PK analysis is pending. The maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached, and dose escalation continues. Updated safety, pharmacokinetic, and preliminary efficacy results from this ongoing study will be presented. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib study of telatinib (BAY 57–9352), a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumours

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14035-14035
Author(s):  
H. M. Shaw ◽  
L. R. Molife ◽  
J. Spicer ◽  
V. Karavasilis ◽  
C. Marriott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Toxic Dose ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Relevant Interaction

14035 Background: Telatinib (BAY 57–9352) inhibits VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 tyrosine kinases, and PDGFR-β and c-Kit. Preclinical data suggests that targeting VEGFR signaling increases antitumor activity. Methods: This trial investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and tumor efficacy of telatinib combined with docetaxel (D). D was administered at a fixed dose of 75mg/m2 on day 1 of 21-day cycles. Telatinib was administered orally, twice daily (bid) from day 3 of Cycle 1 and onwards, thereafter continuously. Dosing of telatinib commenced at 600mg bid (cohort 1, n=6) and increased to 900mg bid (cohort 2, n=7). PK in Cycle 1 were determined on day 1 (D) and day 21 (telatinib). In Cycle 2 comparative PK profiles for both telatinib and D were sampled on days 1–3. Results: Thirteen patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors were enrolled (9M/4F; median age: 56 [range: 34–69]; ECOG PS 0/1: 3/10). A total of 69 cycles have been completed (range,1–10). Treatment-emergent adverse events of CTCAE =3 (NCI-CTC v3.0) were neutropenia (n=11, 79%), fever (n=2, 15%), and fatigue (n=2, 11%). Adverse events of CTC =3 occuring in two pts was febrile neutropenia. Others occurring in only one patient were; hypertension, ALT increase, dehydration, and reversible symptomatic pneumonitis. Study treatment-related adverse events leading to a dose reduction or interruption were neutropenia (n=5, 38%), hypertension (n=1), ALT increase (n=1), and fatigue (n=1). Two pts with prostate ca and 1 with cervical ca had a confirmed partial response. Five pts (1 NSCLC, 1 esophageal ca, 1 renal cell ca and 2 prostate ca) had stable disease for =4 cycles. Mean AUC of D increased by 48% in cohort 1, but only by 16% in cohort 2. Thus, PK data to date do not indicate a clear clinically relevant interaction between telatinib and D. Conclusions: The combination of telatinib and D was tolerated without reaching the toxic dose at telatinib 900mg bid and D 75mg/m2. This combination has demonstrated promising antitumor activity. An extension of the cohort at 900mg bid with 75mg/m2 D is being evaluated to gain further safety and PK data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I clinical trial of vorinostat in combination with sFULV2 in patients with refractory solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4083-4083
Author(s):  
M. G. Fakih ◽  
L. Pendyala ◽  
M. J. Egorin ◽  
G. Fetterly ◽  
I. Espinoza-Delgado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase I Clinical Trial ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Over Expression ◽  
Dose Dependent Fashion ◽  
Grade 3

4083 Background: Thymidylate synthase (TS) over-expression is associated with 5-FU resistance. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that vorinostat down-regulates intra-tumor TS in a dose-dependent fashion and augments 5-FU antitumor activity in xenograft models. We conducted a phase I clinical trial of an intermittent schedule of QD x 3 vorinostat in combination with a fixed dose of fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors. Methods: Vorinostat was escalated in a standard 3 x 3 design in combination with a fixed dose of 5-FU and LV (simplified de Gramont regimen, sFULV2). Vorinostat was given QD x 3 on an every-2-week cycle. sFULV2 started on day 2 of vorinostat and consisted of leucovorin 400 mg/m2 i.v. over 2 hrs followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 over 46 hrs. Results: 24 pts were enrolled: Male/Female: 11/13; ECOG 0/1: 6/18; Age: median 60 (range 42–77) yrs. 21 pts had colorectal cancer (CRC), 1 had gastric, 1 had esophageal, and 1 had anal cancer. Vorinostat dose-levels (DL) were 600 mg, 800 mg, 1000 mg, 1200 mg, 1400 mg, 1700 mg, and 2000 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), consisting of fatigue and hand-and-foot syndrome (H&F), were seen in 2 of 3 pts at the 2000 mg DL. None of the 6 pts at the 1700 mg DL had a DLT. Cycle 1 grade 3/4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia, GI bleeding, fatigue, and H&F in 2 pts at the 2000 mg DL and a non-DLT G3 diarrhea (lasted <24 hrs) in 1 pt at the 1700 mg DL. Grade 2 nausea, fatigue, and anorexia were common; especially at DL ≥ 1700 mg. Antitumor activity was noted in pts with CRC despite prior refractoriness to 5-FU and failure to oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab in all pts. 12/21 CRC pts had a confirmed SD (11) or PR (1). CRC pts had a median PFS of 4 months, a ≥ 6 months PFS rate of 43%, and a ≥ 8 months PFS rate of 33%. Conclusions: The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat in combination with sFULV2 is 1700 mg PO QD x 3 every 2 weeks. This combination is associated with considerable activity in pts with 5-FU-refractory CRC and warrants further investigation. An expanded MTD cohort is accruing to investigate 5-FU-vorinostat PK interaction and intra-tumor TS down-regulation. (This work was supported by a grant from CTEP and the ACS.) No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase Ib/II study of PXD101 alone and in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3501-3501
Author(s):  
D. W. Northfelt ◽  
R. F. Marschke ◽  
E. Bonnem ◽  
C. E. Ooi ◽  
R. Gerwien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Dose Levels

3501 Background: PXD101 is a hydroxamate HDAC inhibitor that has broad anti-neoplastic activity in vivo and in vitro. Preclinical data showing PXD101 down-regulation of thymidylate synthase (TS), an in vivo target of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) provide a rationale for combination of PXD101 with 5-FU. Methods: This is a phase Ib/II trial of PXD101 plus 5-FU in patients with advanced solid tumors, with dose escalation to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and an expansion at the MTD in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Patients (pts) must be = 18 yrs, have measurable disease, and had disease progression after standard chemotherapy. PXD101 was administered as a 30-min IV infusion on Days 1–5 of a 3-wk cycle. 5-FU was administered from cycle 2 on, as a continuous 96-hr IV infusion starting on Day 2 of the same 3-wk cycle. The primary endpoints were safety, and effect of belinostat on TS expression in patients’ tumors. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were PXD101-related = Gr 3 non-hematologic or Gr 4 hematologic toxicities. Expression of TS mRNA was measured by RTQ-PCR. Results: Twenty pts have been treated for a median of 2 cycles (range 1–8). Cohorts of 3–6 pts were tested at 5 dose levels of PXD101/5-FU (mg/m2/d): 300/250, 600/250, 1,000/250, 1,000/500, and 1,000/1,000. Two pts did not complete cycle 2, and one pt at the 600/250 dose level received 1,000 mg/m2/d 5-FU. There were no DLTs in the first 4 dose cohorts; the 5th cohort is ongoing. In the first 4 dose cohorts (17 pts), the most frequent AEs were fatigue, nausea/vomiting, dysgeusia, dehydration, constipation, edema, anorexia and anemia. There were 2 Gr 4 AEs (pulmonary embolism, bacteremia); Gr 3 AEs in = 2 pts were fatigue and dehydration. All Gr 3/4 events were assessed as not related to PXD101. One pt with stage IV CRC treated at 600/1,000 mg/m2/d PXD101/5-FU had stable disease (SD) for 8 cycles, and one pt with stage IV esophageal cancer treated at the 1,000/250 mg/m2/d dose had SD for 4 cycles. Conclusions: PXD101 in combination with 5-FU has been well tolerated up to 1,000/500 mg/m2/d PXD101/5-FU. The study is ongoing and data from the MTD expansion part, including effect of PXD101 on tumor TS expression, will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals A Phase I study of the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of navitoclax plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Puglisi ◽  
L Rhoda Molife ◽  
Maja JA de Jonge ◽  
Khurum H Khan ◽  
Leni van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Optimal Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration

Aim: This Phase I study investigated safety of navitoclax and docetaxel in patients (n = 41) with advanced solid tumors. Patients & methods: Two navitoclax plus docetaxel dosing schedules (21 and 28 days) were evaluated. Maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities and preliminary antitumor activity were assessed. Results: Ten (24%) patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities; dose-escalation cohorts: n = 7 (21-day schedule: n = 5; 28-day schedule: n = 2) and 21-day expanded safety cohort: n = 3. Navitoclax 150-mg days 1–5 every 21 days with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 day 1 was the maximum tolerated dose and optimal schedule. Adverse events included thrombocytopenia (63%), fatigue (61%), nausea (59%) and neutropenia (51%). Four confirmed partial responses occurred. Conclusion: Navitoclax 150-mg orally once/day was safely administered with docetaxel. Myelosuppression limited dose escalation; antitumor activity was observed. Clinical trial registration: NCT00888108 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous VEGF Trap plus FOLFOX4 in a combination phase I clinical trial of patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13061-13061 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mulay ◽  
S. A. Limentani ◽  
M. Carroll ◽  
E. S. Furfine ◽  
D. P. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Vegf Trap

13061 Background: VEGF Trap is a potent angiogenesis inhibitor comprising portions of human VEGF receptor VEGFR1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR2 (KDR) extracellular domains fused to the Fc portion of human IgG. VEGF Trap binds VEGF and neutralizes all VEGF-A isoforms plus placental growth factor. FOLFOX4 is an approved chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of colorectal cancer. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of VEGF Trap plus FOLFOX4 administered intravenously. Methods: Successive cohorts of 3–6 patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors received intravenous VEGF Trap plus FOLFOX4 every 2 weeks. Study endpoints included safety, PK, and immunogenicity. Antitumor activity was assessed by CT scan. Results: Six pts (3 male/3 female), median age 55 (25–74), ECOG PS 0/1/2: 2/4/0, with a variety of advanced solid tumors, including 2 gastric and 2 neuroendocrine tumors, have received a total of 19 cycles of VEGF Trap plus FOLFOX4 across 2 VEGF Trap dose levels (2.0 mg/kg, 4.0 mg/kg) to date. Three of these 6 pts had grade 3 AEs (hypertension [n=2], neutropenia [n=2]), which were manageable and reversible. However, no dose-limiting toxicities or grade 4 AEs have been encountered so far. Preliminary mean free VEGF Trap clearance was 17.1 mL/kg/day. No pts have developed anti-VEGF Trap antibodies. Conclusions: VEGF Trap may be safely combined with FOLFOX4 at the dose levels studied. Preliminary free VEGF Trap clearance did not differ significantly from that seen with single-agent exposure; chemotherapy PK analysis is pending. The maximum tolerated dose has not yet been reached, and dose escalation continues. Updated safety, pharmacokinetic, and preliminary efficacy results from this ongoing study will be presented. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A Phase Ib Clinical Trial of Metformin and Chloroquine in Patients with IDH1-Mutated Solid Tumors

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2474
Author(s):  
Mohammed Khurshed ◽  
Remco J. Molenaar ◽  
Myra E. van Linde ◽  
Ron A. Mathôt ◽  
Eduard A. Struys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
Resonance Spectroscopy ◽  
Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Phase Ib

Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) occur in 60% of chondrosarcoma, 80% of WHO grade II-IV glioma and 20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. These solid IDH1-mutated tumors produce the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) and are more vulnerable to disruption of their metabolism. Methods: Patients with IDH1-mutated chondrosarcoma, glioma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma received oral combinational treatment with the antidiabetic drug metformin and the antimalarial drug chloroquine. The primary objective was to determine the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Radiological and biochemical tumor responses to metformin and chloroquine were investigated using CT/MRI scans and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measurements of D-2HG levels in serum. Results: Seventeen patients received study treatment for a median duration of 43 days (range: 7–74 days). Of twelve evaluable patients, 10 patients discontinued study medication because of progressive disease and two patients due to toxicity. None of the patients experienced a DLT. The MTD was determined to be 1500 mg of metformin two times a day and 200 mg of chloroquine once a day. A serum D/L-2HG ratio of ≥4.5 predicted the presence of an IDH1 mutation with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100%. By utilization of digital droplet PCR on plasma samples, we were able to detect tumor-specific IDH1 hotspot mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in investigated patients. Conclusion: Treatment of advanced IDH1-mutated solid tumors with metformin and chloroquine was well tolerated but did not induce a clinical response in this phase Ib clinical trial.

scholarly journals 412 First-in-human phase I/IIa trial to evaluate the safety and initial clinical activity of DuoBody®-PD-L1×4–1BB (GEN1046) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A437-A437
Author(s):  
Elena Garralda ◽  
Ravit Geva ◽  
Eytan Ben-Ami ◽  
Corinne Maurice-Dror ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Dose Levels

BackgroundAgonistic 4-1BB monoclonal antibodies were preclinically validated as promising cancer immunotherapies, both as monotherapy and as potentiators of the activity of PD-(L)1–blocking agents. However, toxicity and a narrow therapeutic window have hampered their clinical development. DuoBody-PD­-L1×4-1BB, a first-in-class, bispecific, next-generation checkpoint immunotherapy, was designed to overcome these limitations by activating T cells through conditional 4-1BB costimulation, while simultaneously blocking the PD-L1 axis. We present preliminary data from the ongoing, first-in-human, open-label, phase I/IIa trial of DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB in advanced solid tumors (NCT03917381).MethodsDuring dose escalation, patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors not eligible for standard therapy received flat-dose DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB (25–1200 mg) intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters and antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1). Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and antitumor activity (iRECIST) were assessed as exploratory endpoints.ResultsAs of June 22, 2020, 61 patients were enrolled (median age: 59 years). The most common cancer types were colorectal (19.7%), ovarian (14.8%), pancreatic (9.8%), and NSCLC (9.8%). Patients had previously received a median (range) of 3 (1–11) treatments; 44.2% had prior anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. Patients received a median (range) of 4 (1–15) treatment cycles; Cmax was observed shortly after the end of infusion (mean T½: 2.3–10.3 days). Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; 6 patients experienced DLTs. The most common (=10%) treatment-related AEs (all grades; grades 3–4) were transaminase elevation (24.6%; 9.8%), hypothyroidism (16.4%; 1.6%), and fatigue (13.1%; 1.6%). Treatment-related grade-3 transaminase elevations decreased upon corticosteroid administration; no treatment-related bilirubin increases or grade-4 transaminase elevations occurred. Disease control, including stable disease at first assessment and partial responses in triple-negative breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)–pretreated NSCLC, occurred in 40/61 patients (65.6%). Pharmacologic activity, as measured by modulation of adaptive immunity mediators, was observed across a broad range of dose levels. Peripheral proliferating (Ki67+) CD8+ effector memory T cells and serum interferon-gamma levels showed maximum induction relative to baseline (p=0.01) 8 days following treatment.ConclusionsDuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB demonstrated biologic activity and a manageable safety profile. Encouraging early clinical activity across different dose levels was observed in a heavily pretreated population with advanced solid tumors, including those resistant to prior immunotherapy or typically less sensitive to ICIs. Expansion cohorts of patients for whom DuoBody-PD-L1×4-1BB treatment could be relevant and biologically sound have started enrollment. Updated data will be presented.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Manish Gupta, Lei Pang, and Thomas Breuer at Genmab A/S; Alice Bexon, Alexander Muik, and Friederike Gieseke at BioNTech SE; and Zuzana Jirakova (formerly at BioNTech SE) for their valuable contributions. This trial was funded by Genmab A/S and BioNTech SE.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov; trial number: NCT03917381Ethics ApprovalThis trial is undertaken following full approval of the final protocol, amendments, informed consent form, applicable recruiting materials, and subject compensation programs by the Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board.ConsentWritten informed consent, in accordance with principles that originated in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, current ICH guidelines including ICH-GCP E6(R2), applicable regulatory requirements, and sponsor policy, was provided by the patients.

Phase I study of oral S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin (oxali) and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4091-4091
Author(s):  
J. Zhang ◽  
K. Chung ◽  
C. Zergebel ◽  
P. Urrea ◽  
M. Quinones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Cyanuric Acid ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Pharmacokinetics ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

4091 Background: S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine (tegafur, CDHP and potassium oxonate) designed for enhanced DPD inhibition and reduced GI toxicity. Bev and oxali have demonstrated safety and synergistic anti-tumor activity with oral and IV fluoropyrimidines. The primary objective is to investigate the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 combined with bevacizumab and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Secondary objective is to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of the components of S-1 (FT, CDHP, Oxo), 5-FU, a-fluoro-β-alanine, cyanuric acid, uracil, and oxali and to document any antitumor activity. Methods: ECOG 0/1 patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors received oral S-1 starting at 20 mg/m2/dose BID x 14 days (classic 3+3 cohort dose escalation by 5mg/m2/dose until MTD), plus fixed doses of bev 7.5 mg/kg IV day 1, and Oxali 130 mg/m2 IV day 1 of every 3 week cycle, with discontinuation of oxali after 4 cycles. Reintroduction of oxali was allowed upon progression of disease. Toxicity, antitumor activity and PKs were assessed. The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which < 33% of the patients experience a dose- limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first 2 cycles. Results: Of 22 evaluable patients, 3 patients were treated at 20mg/m2 S1 and 13 patients were treated at 25mg/m2 S1 without a DLT. At 30mg/m2, two patients experienced a DLT(Grade 3 diarrhea, Grade 4 mucositis). The MTD and recommended phase II dose of S-1 is 25mg/m2 in combination with oxali and bev. A median of 8 cycles of S-1 were initiated at the 25 mg/m2 dose level. Common MTD level toxicities included fatigue (62%), nausea (62%) and diarrhea (46%), with no grade 4 toxicities observed. Best responses (RECIST): stable disease(16 patients), partial response (2 patients), non-measurable disease (3 patients). The Day 8 AUC(0–8) of 5-FU at 20/25/30 mg/m2 dose level were 230±115 hr*ng/ml, 470±172 hr*ng/ml and 502±169 hr*ng/ml, respectively. Conclusions: The MTD combination of 25mg/m2 S-1, oxali and bev can be given safely. The study will be expanded to test S-1 one week on, one week off schedule in combination with oxali/bev every two weeks. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document