Addressing reproductive health needs of cancer patients: The pilot experience of pioneering oncofertility clinic in Saudi Arabia.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Hayat Ahmed Alrabiah ◽  
Nafisa Abdelhafeiz ◽  
Ashwaq Al Olayan ◽  
Abdul-Rahman Jazieh

37 Background: Fertility and reproductive health issues are commonly encountered in cancer patients and survivors and unfortunately, they are not systematically addressed in many cancer care centers. We are reporting the initial experience in our dedicated Oncofertility Clinic that was established to address all reproductive and fertility issues for all oncology patients at our cancer center. Methods: We launched the first dedicated oncofertility clinic in the region on April 2018, staffed by a consultant of obstetrics and gynecology with the help of a team from in vitro fertilization (IVF) unit and a medical oncologist. It is held on a weekly basis and receives referral from medical oncology, hematology, stem cell transplant and radiation oncology. Eligible patients are males and premenopausal females going for chemotherapy or radiation therapy aiming for fertility preservation or cancer survivors who completed treatment and complaining of infertility problems. The clinic provides fertility preservation through the following procedures: Oocytes freezing (OF), in-vitro fertilization (IVF), sperm freezing, and ovarian transposition. Oncofertility care also includes management of sexual and hormonal dysfunction, and contraception methods. We are capturing the demographic, clinical data of all patients who were served in the clinic and the number of interventions and procedures that they underwent. Results: Between April 2018 and April of 2020, the clinic served 100 patients 60% were female, Median age was 35 years (16 -39). Diagnoses were distributed between breast cancer (36%), lymphoma (10%), and sickle cell anemia patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (10%). The table depicts the types and number of procedures performed on these patients. Conclusions: Our pilot experience revealed the critical need of such clinic to help patients in fertility preservation, management of symptoms of gonadal toxicity. Future plans include implementation of systematic screening approach cancer populations who will benefit from the services and monitor the long- term impact of the clinic on the served patients. [Table: see text]

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9509-9509
Author(s):  
S. T. Vadaparampil ◽  
K. M. Lowrey ◽  
C. A. Miree ◽  
S. S. Eidson ◽  
J. B. Watson ◽  
...  

9509 Background: Studies suggest up to 90% of cancer patients in their reproductive years may be at risk of permanent infertility. Yet, few utilize fertility preservation (FP) technologies. One barrier identified by patients and providers is the lack of insurance coverage for FP services. The goal of this study was to examine codified state policies related to infertility and assess their implications for cancer patients at risk for infertility due to treatment. Methods: A keyword search string was developed to identify statutes and administrative regulations of insurance coverage for FP in effect as of July 1, 2008, for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Laws addressing a more general population but pertaining to cancer patients (e.g., policies addressing in vitro fertilization), were compiled using Lexis-Nexis. Data were analyzed by reviewing the “plain meaning” of the text, legislative/administrative history, and annotated case law. Legal reasoning and common rules of statutory construction and legislative interpretation were used. Findings were recorded using qualitative and dichotomous, quantitative indicators. Quality assurance reviews of all data were conducted and findings were compared with secondary sources. Results: As of July 1, 2008, 15 states (29.4%) had laws relating to insurance coverage for infertility or in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures. Nine states (17.6%) mandated some type of insurance coverage for infertility treatments, 5 of which defined infertility. One state (CA) mandated an offer of coverage for infertility, but did not define it. For laws concerning IVF, 7 states (13.7%) mandated coverage; 1 state (TX) mandated an offer of coverage; and 2 states (CA and IL) specifically excluded IVF from a mandatory offer of coverage. No state laws or regulations addressed insurance coverage for FP methods specific to cancer patients. Conclusions: There is a strong argument for policies that require coverage for infertility of cancer survivors and FP options prior to treatment similar to mandatory coverage requirements for other side effects experienced by cancer patients (e.g., lymphedema, alopecia). No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 539-546
Author(s):  
Jing Wang ◽  
Chi Liu ◽  
Masayuki Fujino ◽  
Guoqing Tong ◽  
Qinxiu Zhang ◽  
...  

Worldwide, infertility affects 8-12% of couples of reproductive age and has become a common problem. There are many ways to treat infertility, including medication, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. In recent years, stem-cell therapy has raised new hope in the field of reproductive disability management. Stem cells are self-renewing, self-replicating undifferentiated cells that are capable of producing specialized cells under appropriate conditions. They exist throughout a human’s embryo, fetal, and adult stages and can proliferate into different cells. While many issues remain to be addressed concerning stem cells, stem cells have undeniably opened up new ways to treat infertility. In this review, we describe past, present, and future strategies for the use of stem cells in reproductive medicine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document