Pemetrexed plus erlotinib as a salvage treatment in high EGFR-expressing metastatic colorectal cancer patients following failure of standard chemotherapy: A phase II single-arm prospective study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 104-104
Author(s):  
Seonggyu Byeon ◽  
Seung Tae Kim ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Joon Oh Park ◽  
...  

104 Background: We conducted a single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the combination of pemetrexed and erlotinib as a salvage treatment in high EGFR-expressing (2+ or 3 on immunohistochemistry (IHC)) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who failed to show a benefit after standard chemotherapy. Methods: We investigated pemetrexed and erlotinib (pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on Day 1 and erlotinib 100 mg/m2 on Days 1–21) as a salvage treatment, given every three weeks, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary outcome was overall response rate (RR). Results: From May 2017 to April 2018, 29 metastatic CRC patients with high EGFR expression who previously received the standard therapies were enrolled into this trial. The regimen was well tolerated. Skin rash, vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia were common toxic effects but were mostly manageable and controllable side effects of only grades 1 or 2. In intent-to-treat analysis, three partial responses (PRs) were observed in enrolled patients, revealing an overall RR of 10.3%. This value supported the statistical hypothesis of this study. Fifteen patients had stable disease and the disease control rate (DCR) was 62.1%. All three patients who achieved a PR had an expression of EGFR 3+ in a tumor. Among eight patients with a tumor expressing an EGFR value of 3+, the RR and DCR were 37.5% and 75.0%, respectively. Conclusions: This phase II trial using pemetrexed and erlotinib in metastatic CRC with high EGFR expression met the primary endpoint of tumor response. Clinical trial information: NCT03086538.

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (22) ◽  
pp. 4195-4201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Bécouarn ◽  
Erick Gamelin ◽  
Bruno Coudert ◽  
Sylvie Négrier ◽  
Jean-Yves Pierga ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m2 followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m2 continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m2 on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document