Randomized Multicenter Phase II Study Comparing a Combination of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid and Alternating Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin With Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan in Fluorouracil-Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (22) ◽  
pp. 4195-4201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Bécouarn ◽  
Erick Gamelin ◽  
Bruno Coudert ◽  
Sylvie Négrier ◽  
Jean-Yves Pierga ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m2 followed by a 400-mg/m2 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m2 continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m2 on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU–resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 474-474
Author(s):  
Taishi Hata ◽  
Akihiro Toyokawa ◽  
Michiya Kobayashi ◽  
Masakazu Miyake ◽  
Masahiro Tsuda ◽  
...  

474 Background: Although theCapeOX (capecitabine+oxaliplatin) regimen obviates the need for a central venous port, administration of oxaliplatin through peripheral vein can cause venous pain. One of the reasons is pH. The pH level of oxaliplatin solution is about 4.8 and that of buffered by steroid is approximately 7.0. To test the hypothesis that adjusting the pH of oxaliplatin solution by mixing steroid can reduce venous pain, we have conducted the randomized control study to compare pH-adjusted oxaliplatin solution with unadjusted oxaliplatin solution. Methods: This was a single-blinded multicenter randomized phase II study. Colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin through peripheral vein were enrolled and randomly assigned to arm A (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 with dexamethasone (DEX) 2 mg) or arm B (the same, without DEX) (UMIN000004286. Venous pain was evaluated according to CTCAE criteria (ver. 4.0) and the verbal rating scale (VRS). Assessments were conducted every 3 weeks until cycle 4. Results: A total of 53 patients (38 men and 15 women; median age, 67 y.o.) were enrolled at 9 institutions in Japan. Of these, 47 evaluable patients were randomized to either arm A (n = 24) or arm B (n = 23). The incidence of venous pain (grade ≥ 2) was 33.3% in arm A and 60.9% in arm B (relative risk 0.55; p = 0.082). The venous pain (VRS score ≥ 3) was 12.5% in arm A and 26.1% in arm B (relative risk 0.48; p = 0.286). No difference was observed in response rate and safety. Conclusions: Adjusting the pH of oxaliplatin solution by addition of a low dose of DEX reduced severe venous pain without influence on response rate and safety. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004286. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document