Effect of core needle biopsy number on intraductal carcinoma diagnosis in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 243-243
Author(s):  
Masashi Kato ◽  
Toyonori Tsuzuki ◽  
Akiyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Takashi Fujita ◽  
Momokazu Gotoh

243 Background: The number of core needle biopsies performed to diagnose metastatic prostate cancer are sometimes reduced in daily clinical practice. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is associated with adverse prognostic parameters and has recently received attention as a valuable indicator for the prediction of disease severity. Currently, the relationship between IDC-P diagnosis and the number of core prostate biopsies is unclear. In the present study, we analyzed the effect of core needle biopsy number on IDC-P diagnosis in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated data from 150 patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer at our hospital between 2002 and 2012. Percentage of the core involved with cancer and the maximum cancer occupancy were 100% in median of all the patients. Subjects were allocated to three groups according to the number of core biopsies performed: ≤5, 6–9, and ≥10. The study endpoints were the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: Twenty-seven (18%) patients had ≤5 core biopsies, 67 (45%) patients had 6–9 core biopsies, and 56 (37%) patients had ≥10 core biopsies. For patients who underwent ≥10 core biopsies, a significant difference on CSS was detected between with or without IDC-P ( p = 0.002). On the other hand, the difference decreased as the number of core biopsies became smaller (6–9; p = 0.322 and ≤5; p = 0.815). A similar trend was identified for the OS outcome. A significant difference on OS was also found between with or without IDC-P in patients who underwent ≥10 and 6–9 core needle biopsies ( p = 0.0002 and 0.015, respectively), but not in those who underwent ≤5 core biopsies ( p = 0.3407). IDC-P served as a stronger prognostic marker for CSS and OS than did the other factors included in the multivariate analysis. ( p = 0.0024, and p = 0.0014, respectively). Conclusions: Given the IDC-P detection and its value as a prognostic marker, we recommend the performance of ≥10 core biopsy procedures in patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer. Sampling error effects the IDC-P value in smaller number of core needle biopsies.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 97-97
Author(s):  
Deepa R. Halaharvi ◽  
Mark H. Cripe

97 Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Core needle biopsy (CNB) has replaced open surgical biopsy for mammographic calcifications. We compare our experience with 8-gauge vs. 11-gauge vacuum assisted core needle biopsy in pure DCIS. We hypothesize that the diagnosis of DCIS with use of an 8-gauge vacuum-assisted core needle will lead to a lower rate of upstaging to invasive cancer at definitive surgical excision compared to 11-gauge vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy. Methods: A retrospective study was performed evaluating all patients who underwent a stereotactic core needle biopsy at our institution for DCIS during 2008-2012.We then compared the upstaging rates between patients biopsied using 8 or 11-gauge biopsy devices. Results: A total of 580 patients underwent STCNB during 2008-2012 at our institution, there were 461 patients excluded as they did not meet inclusion criteria and 119 patients were included. The most common mammographic finding was calcifications in 104/119 (87.4%) and a mammographic mass in 15/119 (12.60%). Biopsy with the 11 gauge needle was utilized in 60 patients and 59 patients with 8-G needle. Factors associated with upstaging were using a smaller 11 gauge needle and a mass on imaging, higher grade and more than four cores obtained on biopsy. There was an upstaging rate of 17/60 (28%) in patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy using a11-gauge needle versus upstaging rate of 7/59 (11.8%) in patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy using 8 gauge needle. We obtained a statistically significant p-value of 0.025. Conclusions: This is one of the few studies comparing upstaging rates from pure DCIS on STCNB using 8 and 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum assisted needles. Our results show that there is a statistically significant decrease in upstaging of pure DCIS to invasive malignancy at excision using the larger 8-gauge needle devices. The clinical implication is that SLNB need not be performed secondary to the low upstaging rate. We recommend that all stereotactic core needle biopsies be performed using the 8-gauge needle devices, and that SLNB generally be omitted for DCIS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 4806-4815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc R. Liechti ◽  
Urs J. Muehlematter ◽  
Aurelia F. Schneider ◽  
Daniel Eberli ◽  
Niels J. Rupp ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22141-e22141
Author(s):  
V. Wolf ◽  
R. Groβe ◽  
J. Erggelet ◽  
H. J. Holzhausen ◽  
S. Hauptmann ◽  
...  

e22141 Background: A milestone of breast-cancer therapy was the discovery of HER-2 entailing special targeted therapy with improved prognosis. The HER-2-status is routinely assessed through immunohistochemistry (IHC; HercepTest) showing protein over-expression and is double-checked with in-situ-hybridisation (ISH) demonstrating gene amplification in equivocal cases. It is questioned whether these methods achieve identical results in core-needle-biopsies and in excisional tumor specimens. Methods: We performed a retrospective comparative study in order to address these questions. From 01/03–06/08 we collected the HercepTest results from both core-needle-biopsy and surgical specimen of 109 breast cancer patients in our institute and compared these to newly evaluated chromogenic ISH (CISH) results for both specimen types in order to assess the reliability of HER-2- diagnosis of both methodological approaches and of specimen type. Results: We found no significant difference in the HER- 2-status determined from either needle-biopsies or surgical specimens irrespective of the test used. For the overall comparison (218 specimens) of HercepTest and CISH we found only slight, non-significant deviations. Four cases were CISH-negative in spite of HercepTest scoring of 3+. Vice versa, five out of the total of 38 (17.4%) CISH-positives did not correspond to the HercepTest results of 0 or 1+. Conclusions: Though not significant, there is some inconsistency in the HER-2-determination depending on the test-method, leaving these cases equivocal. In accordance with the literature, we therefore recommend to at least double-check samples with 2+ in the HercepTest as it is the current standard. Our data support the use of core-needle-biopsy as a reliable tissue sample for HER-2-diagnosis. [Table: see text]


Urology ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Brenner ◽  
Leopoldo E. Ladaga ◽  
Meriel B. Fillion ◽  
Steven M. Schlossberg ◽  
Paul F. Schellhammer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document