Locally advanced scrotal squamous cell carcinoma: Does chemotherapy affect survival?
3 Background: Scrotal squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC)thoughrare, represents the most common forms of scrotal malignancies.40-50% of patients present with locally advanced disease, and treatment is extrapolated from penile cancer. Here we report practice trend and overall survival (OS) outcome of locally advanced SSCC patients who underwent surgery with or without chemotherapy. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the national cancer center database (NCDB) (2004-2016). All patients aged ≥ 18 years with locally advanced SSCC who underwent surgery with or without chemotherapy were included. OS is estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) calculated from Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: 638 patients were identified with SSCC without distant metastasis. Of these 49 underwent surgery with perioperative chemotherapy and 589 underwent surgery alone. At the median follow up of 39.9 months (mo), median OS is 41.4 mo and 145.7 mo for surgery with chemotherapy group versus surgery alone respectively (P-value <0.0001), with aHR for OS 1.673 (95%CI 0.966-2.897). Patients age ≥ 65 (HR= 3.081, 95% CI=2.107- 4.505, p<0.001), Charlson-Deyo Score (CCI) 2 or more (HR=3.441, 95% CI=2.140- .533, p <0.0001), moderately-poorly differentiated carcinoma (HR=1.713, 95% CI=1.038- 2.829, p=0.0352), and higher clinical nodal status N1,N2 and N3 (HR=2.543, 95% CI=1.42-4.548, p=0.0016)were observed to do worse with surgery and chemotherapy. Patients with CCI of 2 or more, moderate to poorly differentiated carcinoma, higher clinical T and N stage (T2- T4 and N1-N3 respectively) were observed more likely to receive surgery and chemotherapy. Conclusions: No OS improvement was seen in locally advanced SSCC with addition of chemotherapy to surgery. Patients who received chemotherapy along with surgery are observed to have higher risk of mortality vs surgery alone. The study is limited by retrospective nature, lack of randomization, patient selection bias, patient’s choice of therapy, small sample size, and missing information.