Finding the missing millions: Integrating automated viral hepatitis screening in a hospital with care and treatment in a primary care setting.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Ruth Brogden ◽  
Su Wang ◽  
Binghong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Patient Navigator ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Hospital System

108 Background: Rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are rising in the US. Patients at Saint Barnabas Medical Cancer Center (SBMC) present with late-stage HCC at higher rates (29%) compared to the national (16%). Chronic Hepatitis C (HCV) and Hepatitis B (HBV) are major drivers of liver cancer, yet screening rates are low. Finding these missing millions is important to reducing rates of HCC. An automated emergency department (ED) viral hepatitis (VH) screening program was initiated in 2018 at SBMC. In January 2020, it was expanded to the inpatient setting and HCV screening was modified from cohort screening (those born in 1945-65) to a one time test for anybody 18 years or over, per updated Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and USPSTF (US Preventive Services Taskforce) recommendations. Methods: The electronic medical record (EMR) was modified to automate screening. HBV testing is triggered by a patient’s country of birth or race, and HCV testing is triggered by age over 18 and no previous testing. The automated HCV (HCV Ab with reflex to HCV RNA) or HBV (HBsAg) lab orders lead to an EMR notification to the nurses of patient eligibility and education is provided to patients. Alerts of positive results are sent to nursing staff, physicians, and the patient navigator (PN). The PN is sent a real-time secure text message and works individually with patients to arrange linkage-to-care (LTC) for evaluation and treatment. Results: From March 2018 - December 2020, 44,002 patients were screened for HCV and 884 (2.0%) were HCVAb+ and 242 (0.55%) HCV RNA+. For HBV, 21,328 patients were screened and 212 (0.99%) were HBsAg+. The expanded screenings accounted for 8,716 (19.8%) of the total HCV screenings. Individuals born outside the 1945-65 birth cohort (younger and older) made up 76.2% of those screened and 41% of the infected. The top 3 countries for HBV screenings were Haiti, Jamaica, and Ecuador. LTC rates, defined as attending first medical appointment or already in care, were 86.8% for HCV and 85.4% for HBV. Of those linked to care, 43 HCV+ patients were seen at a outpatient primary care practice part of SBMC, and of those, 39 initiated HCV cure therapy and 33 were cured (confirmed sustained virologic response at 12 weeks), and 35 HBV+ patients were seen and 6 initiated treatment. Conclusions: This automated program for VH has led to a significant scale up of screening with successful LTC and treatment of patients. Expansion to universal screening of all adults and to the inpatient setting found additional viral hepatitis patients who would have otherwise been missed. In addition to the automated screening, a multidisciplinary team including internists, pharmacists, and patient navigators were part of creating a primary care based program. Integration of viral hepatitis screening and care in a hospital system can be initial steps towards establishing liver cancer prevention program.

scholarly journals 908. Dismantling Barriers to Hepatitis Elimination: Automated Hepatitis C Screening with Care and Cure by a Primary Care Based Team

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S546
Author(s):  
Binghong Xu ◽  
Ruth P Brogden ◽  
Ammie J Patel ◽  
Alyssa Gallipani ◽  
Jaymie Yango ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Viral Hepatitis ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Financial Assistance ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Prior Authorization ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Hcv Screening ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background Liver cancer rates are rising in the US, viral hepatitis accounting for more than 65% of the cases. Yet more than half of viral hepatitis infections remain undiagnosed. In response to the rise in HCV due to the opioid epidemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began recommending a one-time HCV test for all adults in 2020. Screening, linkage to care (LTC) and access to HCV curative therapy must be scaled up to reach the WHO goal of eliminating hepatitis by 2030. Methods In 2018, automated HCV screening utilizing electronic medical record protocols began in the emergency department (ED) based on the date of birth. Drug testing and peer recovery consults were added as eligibility criteria. Screening became universal and expanded to the inpatient units in 2020. Patient navigators (PN) received alerts of positive results and worked with patients to arrange LTC, one site being a primary care-based practice (PCP) where internists provided HCV care and support from ambulatory care clinical pharmacists. Results From Mar 2018 to Mar 2021, 50,873 people were screened for HCV, with 977 (1.9%) testing HCV Ab+, and 259 (0.5%) had confirmed infection by reflex HCV RNA. LTC 86.6% of patients, and 128 (49.4%) were newly diagnosed. Universal screening led to 35,482 testings from Jan 2020-Mar 2021. People born out of the 1945-65 birth cohort made up 75.8% of the screened and 39.1% of the infected. The PCP evaluated 47 HCV patients, initiated therapy in 38; 36 required prior authorization and 15 needed financial assistance. Treatment breakdown was: 29 (76.3%) glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, 6 (15.8%) sofosbuvir/velpatasvir & 3 (7.9%) ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. Pharmacist intervention with prior authorizations and financial assistance significantly reduced the cost (table 1). Thus far, 35 achieved cure with undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks. Table 1. The Cost of Treatment before and after Pharmacist Assistance Conclusion Automated universal testing was an effective and seamless way to scale up HCV screening. Warm handoffs from a PN were important for engaging patients in care. A team approach assisted with removing barriers in therapy access, including prior authorization, specialist requirements, and financial assistance. Novel strategies utilizing ED and hospitals for testing with coordination to PCP are needed to find the missing millions and achieve hepatitis elimination. Disclosures Su Wang, MD MPH, Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support)Gilead Sciences (Grant/Research Support)

scholarly journals Challenging the status quo: results of an acceptability and feasibility study of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) management pathways in Indonesian primary care

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitriana Murriya Ekawati ◽  
Ova Emilia ◽  
Jane Gunn ◽  
Sharon Licqurish ◽  
Phyllis Lau
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Local Health ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders Of Pregnancy ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders

Abstract Background Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are the leading cause of maternal mortality in Indonesia. Focused HDP management pathways for Indonesian primary care practice have been developed from a consensus development process. However, the acceptability and feasibility of the pathways in practice have not been explored. This study reports on the implementation process of the pathways to determine their acceptability and feasibility in Indonesian practice. Methods The pathways were implemented in three public primary care clinics (Puskesmas) in Yogyakarta province for a month, guided by implementation science frameworks of Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Practical Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM). The participating providers (general practitioners (GPs), midwives, and nurses) were asked to use recommendations in the pathways for a month. The pathway implementation evaluations were then conducted using clinical audits and a triangulation of observations, focus groups (FGs), and interviews with all of the participants. Clinical audit data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative data were analysed using a mix of the inductive-deductive approach of thematic analysis. Results A total of 50 primary care providers, four obstetricians, a maternal division officer in the local health office and 61 patients agreed to participate, and 48 of the recruited participants participated in evaluation FGs or interviews. All of the providers in the Puskesmas attempted to apply recommendations from the pathways to various degrees, mainly adopting preeclampsia risk factor screenings and HDP monitoring. The participants expressed that the recommendations empowered their practice when it came to HDP management. However, their practices were challenged by professional boundaries and hierarchical barriers among health care professionals, limited clinical resources, and regulations from the local health office. Suggestions for future scale-up studies were also mentioned, such as involving champion obstetricians and providing more patient education toolkits. Conclusion The HDP management pathways are acceptable and feasible in Indonesian primary care. A further scale-up study is desired and can be initiated with investigations to minimise the implementation challenges and enhance the pathways’ value in primary care practice.

scholarly journals Routinization of HIV & HCV Testing in the Inpatient Setting: Involvement of Residents and Nurses

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S425-S425
Author(s):  
Gabriel Buluku ◽  
Sally Bjornholm ◽  
Travis Brown ◽  
Jamie Mignano ◽  
Sarah Schmalzle
Keyword(s):  
Scale Up ◽  
Internal Medicine Resident ◽  
Fourth Generation ◽  
Hcv Rna ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Medicine Resident ◽  
Opt Out ◽  
Time Of Admission ◽  
Hcv Testing ◽  
Hiv 1

Abstract Background Approximately 1 in 5 and 1 in 2 of people infected with HIV and HCV respectively in the US are unaware of their infection. Risk based opt-in testing strategies result in missed or delayed diagnoses and may further stigmatize these illnesses. The use of routine opt-out testing increases test uptake and can identify patients with HIV or HCV early, resulting in improved outcomes and decreased transmission. This strategy has not yet been fully accepted or operationalized in many health care settings. Methods We implemented routine opt-out HIV and HCV testing for all inpatients using internal medicine resident and nurse driven screening models. Patients were eligible for each test if they had not been tested within 1 year and were not known to be infected. Residents were educated on rationale and protocols for routine opt out testing via one grand rounds lecture (January 2016) and one residency orientation lecture (August 2016). Between March and November 2016, residents were incentivized with gift cards awarded for most tests ordered. Nurses were educated through targeted forums. Instructions were distributed and placed in high traffic areas and HIV 1/2 fourth-generation Ag-Ab and HCV Ab orders were added to admission order sets. Patients were given a chance to decline after routine opt-out testing was offered and educational brochure provided, in accordance with Maryland law. Positive tests were confirmed using Western Blot initially, later changed to HIV 1/2 differentiation assay; HCV was confirmed with HCV RNA. Those with confirmed infection were linked to care. Results 71% of 3814 and 83% of 2219 eligible patients were tested for HIV and HCV; 54 (2%) and 390 (21%) were diagnosed with HIV and HCV respectively (Figure 1). Testing activity averaged 32 HIV and 28 HCV tests per month from January to March 2016 and increased after the noted interventions to an average of 300 HIV and 247 HCV tests per month from January to March 2017. Conclusion A high disease burden was found within the studied population, highlighting the benefit of routine opt out testing for HIV and HCV. Empowering residents and nurses to offer screening at time of admission is a viable strategy to scale up testing in the inpatient setting. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Development and implementation of a culturally tailored early childhood program in an integrated pediatric primary care practice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-297
Author(s):  
Tyanna C. Snider ◽  
Whitney J. Raglin Bignall ◽  
Cody A. Hostutler ◽  
Ariana C. Hoet ◽  
Bethany L. Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Pediatric Primary Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Early Childhood Program ◽  
Culturally Tailored ◽  
Childhood Program

WikiRecs primary care: developing rapid recommendations for primary care through effective collaboration between systematic review and guideline teams

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. bjgp18X697085
Author(s):  
Trudy Bekkering ◽  
Bert Aertgeerts ◽  
Ton Kuijpers ◽  
Mieke Vermandere ◽  
Jako Burgers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Urinary Stones ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Supervised Exercise ◽  
Review Team ◽  
New Evidence

BackgroundThe WikiRecs evidence summaries and recommendations for clinical practice are developed using trustworthy methods. The process is triggered by studies that may potentially change practice, aiming at implementing new evidence into practice fast.AimTo share our first experiences developing WikiRecs for primary care and to reflect on the possibilities and pitfalls of this method.MethodIn March 2017, we started developing WikiRecs for primary health care to speed up the process of making potentially practice-changing evidence in clinical practice. Based on a well-structured question a systematic review team summarises the evidence using the GRADE approach. Subsequently, an international panel of primary care physicians, methodological experts and patients formulates recommendations for clinical practice. The patient representatives are involved as full guideline panel members. The final recommendations and supporting evidence are disseminated using various platforms, including MAGICapp and scientific journals.ResultsWe are developing WikiRecs on two topics: alpha-blockers for urinary stones and supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication. We did not face major problems but will reflect on issues we had to solve so far. We anticipate having the first WikiRecs for primary care available at the end of 2017.ConclusionThe WikiRecs process is a promising method — that is still evolving — to rapidly synthesise and bring new evidence into primary care practice, while adhering to high quality standards.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document