The landscape of mortality during or within 30 days after non-palliative radiotherapy across 11 major cancer types.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6570-6570
Author(s):  
Michael Xiang ◽  
Ann C. Raldow ◽  
Erqi L. Pollom ◽  
Michael L. Steinberg ◽  
Amar Upadhyaya Kishan

6570 Background: The rate of peri-RT mortality (death that occurs during or within 30 days after non-palliative radiotherapy) has not been previously characterized. Risk factors and predictors for peri-RT mortality are unknown. Methods: Adult and pediatric patients with non-metastatic cancer who received non-palliative external beam radiation between 2004-2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database for 11 cancer types: breast, prostate, genitourinary (non-prostate), bone/soft tissue, gynecological, head/neck, lymphoma, gastrointestinal, small cell lung, non-small cell lung, and central nervous system (CNS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of peri-RT mortality while controlling for 16 covariates, including patient, tumor, and treatment factors. Results: Approximately 1.32 million patients were identified. Peri-RT mortality was 2.8% overall but spanned 2 orders of magnitude depending on cancer type, ranging from 0.1% for breast cancer to 8.6% for CNS malignancies. Other cancers with > 5% peri-RT mortality were non-prostate genitourinary, small cell lung, and non-small cell lung. Peri-RT mortality steadily improved from 3.5% in 2004 to 2.0% in 2016 ( P <.0001). Major predictors of peri-RT mortality were cancer stage, older age, baseline comorbidity, and lack of private insurance, while male sex, Black race, and geographical region were associated with modestly increased risk (all P <.0001). Conversely, treatment at an academic center, higher patient volume at the treating facility, concurrent chemotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy were associated with modestly decreased risk (all P <.0001). Among patients receiving stereotactic radiotherapy, peri-RT mortality was 1.0% (adjusted odds ratio 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.30, P <.0001), underscoring the excellent safety record of this treatment approach. Conclusions: Peri-RT mortality varied considerably as a function of multiple disease-specific and sociodemographic differences, which highlight potential areas of health disparities. Early recognition of patients at increased risk may facilitate closer monitoring or other prophylactic interventions.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran A. Ahmed ◽  
Ben C. Creelan ◽  
Jeffrey Peacock ◽  
Eric A Mellon ◽  
Youngchul Kim ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe hypothesized that the radiosensitivity index (RSI), would classify non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients into radioresistant (RR) or radiosensitive (RS).MethodsWe identified resected pathologic stage III NSCLC. For the radiation group (RT) group, at least 45 Gy of external beam radiation was required. mRNA was extracted from primary tumor. The predefined cut-point was the median RSI with a primary endpoint of local control. Similar criteria were then applied to two extramural datasets (E1; E2) with progression free survival as the primary endpoint.ResultsMedian follow-up from diagnosis was 23.5 months (range: 4.8-169.6 months). RSI was associated with time to local failure in the RT group with a two-year rate of local control of 80% and 56% between RS and RR groups, respectively p=0.02. RSI was the only variable found to be significant on Cox local control analysis (HR 2.9; 95% CI: 1.2-8.2; p=0.02). There was no significance of RSI in predicting local control in patients not receiving RT, p=0.48. A cox regression model between receipt of radiotherapy and RSI combining E1 and E2 showed that the interaction term was significant for PFS (3.7; 95% CI 1.4-10; p=0.009). A summary measure combining E1 and E2 showed statistical significance for PFS between RR and RS patients treated with radiotherapy (HR 2.7l; 95% CI 1.3-5.6; p=0.007) but not in patients not treated with radiotherapy (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.5-1.78; p=0.86).ConclusionsRSI appears to be predictive for benefit from adjuvant radiation. Prospective validation is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document