Serious infections and cardiovascular complications among patients with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma treated with first-line ibrutinib or bendamustine/rituximab.

e19503 Background: Clinical trials have shown positive outcomes associated with ibrutinib monotherapy (IM) and bendamustine / rituximab combination (BR) therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) compared to other standard treatments, but limited real-world data exist. This study evaluated serious infections and cardiovascular complications in CLL patients treated with first-line IM or BR therapy using US real-world data. Methods: Administrative claims from the MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify adult patients enrolled in commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance plans based on a first prescription fill of IM or BR therapy (the index date) from 2/1/14 to 9/1/19. Patients were diagnosed with CLL, treatment naïve, and continuously enrolled for ≥12 months prior to and following the index date. Serious infections and cardiovascular complications requiring hospitalization (diagnosis code in any position) were evaluated during a fixed 12-month follow-up period. Statistical differences in outcome distributions between the treatment groups were tested. Multivariate logistic regression models for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) were also conducted to determine the adjusted odds of hospitalization. Results: Of 2,138 CLL patients, 810 had IM and 512 had BR as index therapy with ≥12 months of follow-up data. Patients receiving IM were older and more likely to have had an LRTI during baseline compared to BR patients, otherwise both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Hospitalization for serious infections was more common during follow-up among IM patients than BR patients (17.7% vs. 13.1%; p = 0.027). Specifically, 10.2% of IM patients had a bacterial infection hospitalization compared to 5.7% of BR patients (p = 0.004) and 10.7% of IM patients had a LRTI hospitalization compared to 6.6% of BR patients (p = 0.012). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, IM patients did not have significantly higher odds of a LRTI hospitalization (OR = 1.51; p = 0.069). Hospitalization for cardiovascular complications was more common during follow-up among IM patients than BR patients (18.3% vs. 11.9%; p = 0.002). Specifically, 8.4% of IM patients had an AF-related hospitalization versus 2.7% of BR patients (p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, IM patients were more likely to have a hospitalization for AF versus BR patients (OR = 3.89; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In a real-world setting, serious infections and cardiovascular complications were more common among CLL patients treated with first-line IM compared to BR during 12 months of follow-up. IM patients were more likely than BR patients to have an inpatient admission due to AF after adjusting for other patient characteristics.

Download Full-text

Treatment patterns and characteristics of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) patients receiving arsenic trioxide (ATO) therapy in a real-world setting.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e18522 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e18522-e18522

Author(s):

Boxiong Tang ◽

Susan Gabriel ◽

Jifang Zhou ◽

Ashutosh K. Pathak ◽

Debra Irwin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Index Date ◽

Claims Data ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Chronic Obstructive ◽

Administrative Claims ◽

First Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data

e18522 Background: Clinical trials have shown that low-risk APL patients had significantly better outcomes when receiving first-line all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) + ATO compared with standard ATRA + chemotherapy. Few published studies have used real-world data to describe patients using ATO and their current treatment patterns. This study used United States (US) administrative claims data to describe treatment patterns and characteristics of patients receiving first-line ATO. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study used claims data from the MarketScan databases. As there is no ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for APL, ATO treatment was used as a surrogate for the diagnosis of APL since ATO is typically used only in APL patients. Patients were selected if they had ≥1 claims for ATO between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2015. Date of first use was designated the index date. To identify first-line ATO initiation, patients with ATRA or other APL-indicated chemotherapy claims any time before the index date were excluded. Variable baseline and follow-up periods consisting of ≥3 months of pre-index and ≥30 days of post-index continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefit were used. Results: In total, 331 patients were identified with a subset (n = 265) having ≥2 claims for ATO. The analysis focused on these 265 patients, 54% of whom were male. Mean age was 60.6 years; 45% were covered by Medicare. The most common comorbid conditions measured were diabetes (6%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5%), and congestive heart failure (4%). The most commonly selected APL treatments administered during follow-up were ATRA (17%) and daunorubicin (9%) with the use of idarubicin, cytarabine, and mitoxantrone at less than 3%. Maintenance therapy with methotrexate or 6-mercaptopurine was observed in 7% and 6% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to examine patient characteristics and treatment patterns for first-line ATO using real-world data. Further research is needed to evaluate outcomes for patients receiving ATO as first-line therapy and to re-evaluate treatment guidelines in light of these outcomes.

Download Full-text

Real-world incidence and costs of serious infections and cardiovascular complications among patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with first-line ibrutinib or bendamustine/rituximab.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e19528 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e19528-e19528

Author(s):

Debra E. Irwin ◽

Stephen Thompson ◽

Rinat Ribalov ◽

Azhar Choudhry

Keyword(s):

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Real World ◽

Index Date ◽

Cardiovascular Complications ◽

Hospitalized Patients ◽

First Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Serious Infections

e19528 Background: Patients with Indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) have shown positive outcomes with ibrutinib monotherapy (IM) as well as bendamustine/rituximab combination (BR) therapy, but no studies have reported on patient outcomes using real-world data. The current analysis evaluated serious infections and cardiovascular complications in iNHL patients treated with first-line IM or BR therapy using US real-world data. Methods: Administrative claims from the MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify adult patients enrolled in commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance plans based on a first prescription fill of IM or BR therapy (the index date) from 2/1/14 to 9/1/19. Patients included in the study were diagnosed with iNHL, were treatment naïve, and were continuously enrolled for ≥12 months both prior to and following the index date. Serious infections and cardiovascular complications requiring hospitalization (diagnosis code in any position) and associated inpatient costs were evaluated during a fixed 12-month follow-up period. Statistical differences in outcome distributions and costs (reported per patient per month [PPPM]) between the groups were tested. Results: Of 1,948 iNHL patients, 147 had IM and 1,058 had BR as index therapy with ≥12 months of follow-up data. Patients receiving IM were older, more often male, and more likely to have had a lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) or atrial fibrillation (AF) during baseline compared to BR patients, otherwise the groups had similar baseline characteristics. Hospitalization for serious infections was similar for IM and BR patients during the follow-up period (17.0% vs. 14.4%; p = 0.397); among hospitalized patients, the IM and BR groups incurred similar PPPM inpatient costs ($2,839 vs. $3,954; p = 0.188). Specifically, 7.5% of IM patients had a bacterial infection hospitalization and incurred $2,561 PPPM vs 7.6% of BR patients who incurred $3,975 PPPM (both p > 0.05); 8.8% of IM patients had a LRTI hospitalization and incurred $3,629 PPPM vs 6.1% of BR patients who incurred $4,980 PPPM (both p > 0.05). Hospitalization for cardiovascular complications was similar during follow-up for IM and BR patients (15.6% vs. 12.2%; p = 0.237); among hospitalized patients, the IM and BR groups incurred similar PPPM costs ($3,777 vs. $3,862; p = 0.948). Specifically, 7.5% of IM patients had a hospitalization for AF and incurred $4,481 PPPM vs 3.6% of BR patients who incurred $4,860 PPPM (p = 0.025 and p = 0.875, respectively). Conclusions: In a real-world setting, serious infections and cardiovascular complications requiring hospitalization, including associated costs, were similar among iNHL patients treated with first-line IM or BR over 12 months, although IM patients were more likely to have an AF-related complication.

Download Full-text

928-P: Dulaglutide Has Higher Adherence and Persistence than Semaglutide and Exenatide QW: 6-Month Follow-Up from U.S. Real-World Data

Diabetes ◽

10.2337/db20-928-p ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 928-P

Author(s):

REEMA MODY ◽

MARIA YU ◽

BAL K. NEPAL ◽

MANIGE KONIG ◽

MICHAEL GRABNER

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data ◽

Exenatide Qw

Download Full-text

CML-296: First-Line Treatment Outcomes of CML Patients in a Real-World Data Setting in Lebanon

Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia ◽

10.1016/s2152-2650(21)01778-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 ◽

pp. S332-S333

Author(s):

Fadi Nasr ◽

Intissar Yehia ◽

Reem El Khoury ◽

Saada Diab ◽

Ahmad Al Ghoche ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Outcomes ◽

Real World ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data ◽

First Line Treatment

Download Full-text

Healthcare utilization and costs associated with first-line treatment with obinutuzumab- and rituximab-based regimens for follicular lymphoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e19536 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e19536-e19536

Author(s):

Jamie T. Ta ◽

Tu My To ◽

Cheryl Sud ◽

Sheila Shapouri ◽

Arpamas Seetasith

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Healthcare Utilization ◽

Real World ◽

Healthcare Costs ◽

Trial Participation ◽

Administrative Claims ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

First Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

Eligibility Criteria

e19536 Background: Current real-world data on healthcare utilization (HCU) and costs of common first-line (1L) follicular lymphoma (FL) regimens, including obinutuzumab (G), remain limited. The aim of this study was to examine real-world HCU and costs for the most common National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended 1L FL treatments. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus and IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases. We identified patients (pts) ≥18 years, who had ≥1 inpatient claim or ≥2 outpatient claims, with a diagnosis of FL from February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2020, and had received 1L FL treatment (per NCCN guidelines) between February 1, 2016 and September 30, 2019. The first claim for FL treatment was the index date. All pts had ≥12 months of pre- and ≥6 months of post-index continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefits. Pts with other primary cancers, FL treatment, or stem cell transplant during the pre-index period, and clinical trial participation or end-stage renal disease during the study period were excluded. All-cause HCU and costs (2020 USD) per pt during the 6-month post-index period were reported for the five most common 1L FL regimens (only complete NCCN regimens were considered). Results: Overall, 1991 pts met the eligibility criteria, and 53% were male. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age and Charlson Comorbidity Index at index were 58 (10.4) years, and 1.7 (1.0), respectively. The most common 1L regimens were rituximab-bendamustine (R-benda; n=818 [41.1%]), R-monotherapy (R-mono; n=592 [29.7%]), R-CHOP (n=461 [23.2%]), G-benda (n=86 [4.3%]), and R-CVP (n=34 [1.7%]). The proportion of pts who had ≥1 hospitalization or an emergency room visit was highest with R-CHOP (26.7% and 33.6%, respectively) and lowest with R-mono (11.3% and 18.1%, respectively). Mean (SD) all-cause total healthcare costs were highest with R-benda and G-benda, followed by R-CHOP, R-CVP, and R-mono (Table). Mean (SD) all-cause medical and FL treatment costs (drug and administration) were highest for R-benda ($174,407 [$110,520]; $135,520 [$96,492]) and lowest for R-mono ($87,368 [$83,910]; $54,271 [$40,433]). Conclusions: This real-world study provides an update on HCU and costs among pts initiating current NCCN-recommended 1L treatment for FL. Unadjusted 6-month total healthcare costs were highest with R-benda, followed by G-benda, while the lowest costs were seen with R-CVP and R-mono. Future studies with adjustment for pt characteristics are needed to compare HCU and costs between FL regimens.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

First-line and beyond: West Midlands real-world data for EGFR mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC

Lung Cancer ◽

10.1016/s0169-5002(20)30166-5 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 139 ◽

pp. S60-S61

Author(s):

R. Powell ◽

R. Kussaibati ◽

A. Khan ◽

A. Sivapalasuntharam ◽

P. Wilson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

First Line ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data ◽

West Midlands ◽

Egfr Mutant

Download Full-text

Application of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to Evaluate New Laboratory Tests in a Health System: A Case Study of Bladder Cancer Testing

Academic Pathology ◽

10.1177/2374289520968225 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 ◽

pp. 237428952096822

Author(s):

Erik J. Landaas ◽

Ashley M. Eckel ◽

Jonathan L. Wright ◽

Geoffrey S. Baird ◽

Ryan N. Hansen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bladder Cancer ◽

Pilot Study ◽

Health Technology Assessment ◽

Technology Assessment ◽

Real World ◽

Health Technology ◽

Test System ◽

Real World Data ◽

World Data

We describe the methods and decision from a health technology assessment of a new molecular test for bladder cancer (Cxbladder), which was proposed for adoption to our send-out test menu by urology providers. The Cxbladder health technology assessment report contained mixed evidence; predominant concerns were related to the test’s low specificity and high cost. The low specificity indicated a high false-positive rate, which our laboratory formulary committee concluded would result in unnecessary confirmatory testing and follow-up. Our committee voted unanimously to not adopt the test system-wide for use for the initial diagnosis of bladder cancer but supported a pilot study for bladder cancer recurrence surveillance. The pilot study used real-world data from patient management in the scenario in which a patient is evaluated for possible recurrent bladder cancer after a finding of atypical cytopathology in the urine. We evaluated the type and number of follow-up tests conducted including urine cytopathology, imaging studies, repeat cystoscopy evaluation, biopsy, and repeat Cxbladder and their test results. The pilot identified ordering challenges and suggested potential use cases in which the results of Cxbladder affected a change in management. Our health technology assessment provided an objective process to efficiently review test performance and guide new test adoption. Based on our pilot, there were real-world data indicating improved clinician decision-making among select patients who underwent Cxbladder testing.

Download Full-text