Instructional Support and Academic Skills: Impacts of INSIGHTS in Classrooms With Shy Children

Author(s):  
Meghan McCormick ◽  
Hope White ◽  
Parham Horn ◽  
Rachel Lacks ◽  
Erin O’Connor ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noona Kiuru ◽  
Jari-Erik Nurmi ◽  
Esko Leskinen ◽  
Minna Torppa ◽  
Anna-Maija Poikkeus ◽  
...  

This study examined the longitudinal associations between children’s academic skills and the instructional support teachers gave individual students. A total of 253 Finnish children were tested on reading and math skills twice in the first grade and once in the second grade. The teachers of these children rated the instructional support that they gave each child in reading and mathematics. The results showed that the poorer the student’s reading and math skills were, the more support and attention the student received from his or her teacher later on. However, instructional support did not contribute positively to the subsequent development of the students’ academic skills. The person-oriented analyses showed that a relatively small group of children, that is, those showing the poorest academic skills, received the largest dose of teacher support, both with respect to reading and mathematics.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 691-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghan McCormick ◽  
Hope White ◽  
Parham Horn ◽  
Rachel Lacks ◽  
Erin O’Connor ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrid Wichmann ◽  
Detlev Leutner

Seventy-nine students from three science classes conducted simulation-based scientific experiments. They received one of three kinds of instructional support in order to encourage scientific reasoning during inquiry learning: (1) basic inquiry support, (2) advanced inquiry support including explanation prompts, or (3) advanced inquiry support including explanation prompts and regulation prompts. Knowledge test as well as application test results show that students with regulation prompts significantly outperformed students with explanation prompts (knowledge: d = 0.65; application: d = 0.80) and students with basic inquiry support only (knowledge: d = 0.57; application: d = 0.83). The results are in line with a theoretical focus on inquiry learning according to which students need specific support with respect to the regulation of scientific reasoning when developing explanations during experimentation activities.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pui-Wa Lei ◽  
James C. Diperna ◽  
Paul L. Morgan ◽  
Qiong Wu ◽  
Kirsten Hochstedt
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Joo Jeon ◽  
Shavaun M. Wall ◽  
Carla A. Peterson ◽  
Gayle J. Luze ◽  
Mark E. Swanson

2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-176
Author(s):  
Hwajin Yi ◽  
Tae-eun Kim ◽  
Sangchul Oh ◽  
Soeng-Yul Kim ◽  
So-Young Park
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen van der Gaast ◽  
Laura Koenders ◽  
Ger Post

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document