The Heavy Users of Psychiatric Services, Now and in the Future

2021 ◽  
pp. 361-371
Author(s):  
Marianne Kastrup
2006 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Howard H. Goldman

1948 ◽  
Vol 94 (394) ◽  
pp. 107-113
Author(s):  
J. J. O'Reilly

I welcome the opportunity of presenting this short paper to the meeting, particularly as I have just returned from the United States, where I have seen something of the modern trend of psychiatry in that country.The memorandum on the future organization of the psychiatric services, published by this Association in 1944, defines a psychiatric unit as that part of a general hospital, whether in-patients or out-patient, which is set aside for the treatment of mental disorders, with or without legal formalities.


1993 ◽  
Vol 162 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Abrahamson

It is ironic, in a field with many other ironies, that a number of studies (Johnstone et al, 1981; Mathai & Gopinath, 1985; Curson et al, 1992) have questioned what Mathai & Gopinath call “the hitherto inviolate (and ingenious) concept of institutionalisation”, at a time when massive deinstitutionalisation is casting into relief some of the practices to which it refers (Team for the Assessment of Psychiatric Services, 1990; Murphy, 1991; Abrahamson, 1993). However, the gap that this creates between theory and practice may be risky for the future. It would certainly be a major failure if the institutional era with which psychiatry's early professional identity was so intimately bound up were to end in unresolved contradictions. With this background, it will be argued here that re-examination of institutionalisation in the context of the longitudinal course of schizophrenic disorders both confirms the validity of the concept and sets a demanding agenda for alternative care in the community.


The Lancet ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 302 (7836) ◽  
pp. 1013-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.J.J. Letemendia ◽  
A.D. Harris

2007 ◽  
Vol 164 (10) ◽  
pp. 1468-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Liptzin ◽  
Gary L. Gottlieb ◽  
Paul Summergrad

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 581-582
Author(s):  
John Kellett

Changes in the organisation and delivery of psychiatric services are likely to increase the stigma of mental illness, reduce the role of the psychiatrist, and inhibit recruitment of the best medical students. The value of close integration with the district general hospital and medical school is stressed. The future of psychiatry will be in doubt if this is ignored.


The Lancet ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 303 (7861) ◽  
pp. 801-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.F. Tredgold ◽  
D. Storer

1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 130-138 ◽  

SummaryIn 1981, the Labour Minister for Health in a coalition government, Mrs Eileen Desmond, set up a study group ‘to examine the main components, both institutional and community, of the psychiatric services; to assess the existing services, to clarify their objectives and to draw up planning guidelines for future development of the service with due regard to cost implications; to carry out such studies and to take part in such consultations as are necessary to assist this examination’. The result appeared in December 1984 in the form of a report The Psychiatric Services: Planning for the Future. The text of the response of the Irish Division of the College, reproduced in full here, was sent to the current Minister for Health, Mr Barry Desmond, (also a Labour Minister in a coalition government) in October 1985. Meanwhile, in February 1986, Mr Desmond caused widespread alarm in political circles by the sudden announcement of the closure of two of the 22 psychiatric hospitals in the Republic without prior provision of alternative community services. British readers will detect a close parallel between this Irish report and the series of DHSS reports exemplified by Better Services for the Mentally Ill (HMSO, 1975). Perhaps the only significant difference between these two reports is that sectorisation (a mental health team headed by a psychiatrist and assigned to a ‘sector’ of 25,000 to 30,000 persons) is advocated rather more firmly in Planning for the Future. It is also worth remembering that the Republic of Ireland, in its population size and urban-rural distribution is comparable to the whole of Yorkshire. Half the population lives in Dublin. Elsewhere, psychiatric services must cope with widely scattered rural populations, with a minority only of working adults. There is a large private sector in Irish medicine and 20% of psychiatric admissions are to one or other of five private psychiatric hospitals. Despite these social differences from the UK, several comparative studies have shown a remarkable similarity in declared attitudes and practice amongst Irish compared with British psychiatrists. Finally, the method of remuneration of Irish family doctors differs from the UK: Irish GP's are paid, not on a capitation basis, but on a ‘fee-per-item-of-service’ basis with a majority of the population availing of this service free: patients tend to move from doctor to doctor and many use private health insurance to opt for private care. Psychiatric referral rates from general practice are low as in Britain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document