Hardware Test Beds

Author(s):  
Paul J. Fortier ◽  
George R. Desrochers
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Diego A. Monroy-Ortiz ◽  
Sergio A. Dorado-Rojas ◽  
Eduardo Mojica-Nava ◽  
Sergio Rivera

Abstract This article presents a comparison between two different methods to perform model reduction of an Electrical Power System (EPS). The first is the well-known Kron Reduction Method (KRM) that is used to remove the interior nodes (also known as internal, passive, or load nodes) of an EPS. This method computes the Schur complement of the primitive admittance matrix of an EPS to obtain a reduced model that preserves the information of the system as seen from to the generation nodes. Since the primitive admittance matrix is equivalent to the Laplacian of a graph that represents the interconnections between the nodes of an EPS, this procedure is also significant from the perspective of graph theory. On the other hand, the second procedure based on Power Transfer Distribution Factors (PTDF) uses approximations of DC power flows to define regions to be reduced within the system. In this study, both techniques were applied to obtain reduced-order models of two test beds: a 14-node IEEE system and the Colombian power system (1116 buses), in order to test scalability. In analyzing the reduction of the test beds, the characteristics of each method were classified and compiled in order to know its advantages depending on the type of application. Finally, it was found that the PTDF technique is more robust in terms of the definition of power transfer in congestion zones, while the KRM method may be more accurate.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
JONATHAN HAMMOND ◽  
SIMON BAILEY ◽  
OZ GORE ◽  
KATH CHECKLAND ◽  
SARAH DARLEY ◽  
...  

Abstract Public-Private Innovation Partnerships (PPIPs) are increasingly used as a tool for addressing ‘wicked’ public sector challenges. ‘Innovation’ is, however, frequently treated as a ‘magic’ concept: used unreflexively, taken to be axiomatically ‘good’, and left undefined within policy programmes. Using McConnell’s framework of policy success and failure and a case study of a multi-level PPIP in the English health service (NHS Test Beds), this paper critically explores the implications of the mobilisation of innovation in PPIP policy and practice. We highlight how the interplay between levels (macro/micro and policy maker/recipient) can shape both emerging policies and their prospects for success or failure. The paper contributes to an understanding of PPIP success and failure by extending McConnell’s framework to explore inter-level effects between policy and innovation project, and demonstrating how the success of PPIP policy cannot be understood without recognising the particular political effects of ‘innovation’ on formulation and implementation.


Author(s):  
T. Rampradesh ◽  
P. Vimala ◽  
S. Jaisiva ◽  
M. Sujith ◽  
K. Sakthisudhan
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
T.M. Amirthalakshmi ◽  
D. Subitha ◽  
A. Johnson Santhosh ◽  
Balachandra Pattanaik ◽  
Bharani Murugesan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rubyet Islam ◽  
Peter Sandborn

Abstract Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) is an engineering discipline focused on predicting the point at which systems or components will no longer perform as intended. The prediction is often articulated as a Remaining Useful Life (RUL). RUL is an important decision-making tool for contingency mitigation, i.e., the prediction of an RUL (and its associated confidence) enables decisions to be made about how and when to maintain the system. PHM is generally applied to hardware systems in the electronics and non-electronics application domains. The application of PHM (and RUL) concepts has not been explored for application to software. Today, software (SW) health management is confined to diagnostic assessments that identify problems, whereas prognostic assessment potentially indicates when in the future a problem will become detrimental to the operation of the system. Relevant areas such as SW defect prediction, SW reliability prediction, predictive maintenance of SW, SW degradation, and SW performance prediction, exist, but all represent static models, built upon historical data — none of which can calculate an RUL. This paper addresses the application of PHM concepts to software systems for fault predictions and RUL estimation. Specifically, we wish to address how PHM can be used to make decisions for SW systems such as version update, module changes, rejuvenation, maintenance scheduling and abandonment. This paper presents a method to prognostically and continuously predict the RUL of a SW system based on usage parameters (e.g., numbers and categories of releases) and multiple performance parameters (e.g., response time). The model is validated based on actual data (on performance parameters), generated by the test beds versus predicted data, generated by a predictive model. Statistical validation (regression validation) has been carried out as well. The test beds replicate and validate faults, collected from a real application, in a controlled and standard test (staging) environment. A case study based on publicly available data on faults and enhancement requests for the open-source Bugzilla application is presented. This case study demonstrates that PHM concepts can be applied to SW systems and RUL can be calculated to make decisions on software version update or upgrade, module changes, rejuvenation, maintenance schedule and total abandonment.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin Probe ◽  
Vinicius Guimaraes Goecks ◽  
John Hurtado

2005 ◽  
Vol 74 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 205-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dremel ◽  
C. Day ◽  
A. Mack ◽  
H. Jensen ◽  
E. Speth ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 2159-2190 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Alcubierre ◽  
S Brandt ◽  
B Brügmann ◽  
C Gundlach ◽  
J Massó ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document