Single-Channel Theory and Automaticity Theory

Proponents of a “single channel” theory of the psychological refractory period have not specified whether the single channel occupies only the decision component of the response selection, only the motor or response component, or both. In this experiment, the delay in the RT to the second of two successively presented stimuli was examined as a function of whether or not an overt motor response was made to the first stimulus, keeping the decision component constant. It was found that in both conditions RT2 was delayed, suggesting that the decision component was a part of the single channel. However, RT2 was delayed by a significantly greater amount if a motor response was required, indicating that the motor component is part of the single channel as well. Implications of the results for an expectancy theory of the psychological refractory period are discussed.

Download Full-text

Single-Channel Theory and Automaticity Theory

Applied Attention Theory ◽

10.1201/9780429059261-2 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 9-20

Author(s):

Christopher D. Wickens ◽

Jason S. McCarley

Keyword(s):

Single Channel ◽

Channel Theory

Download Full-text

Response Time to a First Signal as a Function of Time Relationship to a Second Signal and Mode of Presentation

Perceptual and Motor Skills ◽

10.2466/pms.1971.32.3.811 ◽

1971 ◽

Vol 32 (3) ◽

pp. 811-816 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Marcelline M. Burns ◽

Herbert Moskowitz

Keyword(s):

Response Time ◽

Refractory Period ◽

Psychological Refractory Period ◽

Single Channel ◽

Time Sharing ◽

Random Presentation ◽

Time Relationship ◽

Processing Mechanisms ◽

Channel Theory ◽

Support Time

Using a random presentation of inter-stimulus intervals between stimulus 1 and stimulus 2 in a psychological refractory period paradigm, this experiment permitted comparison of data obtained earlier using a block presentation. With 10 male Ss per study, response time to stimulus 1 increased at higher inter-stimulus intervals under block presentations but not under random presentations. The results are interpreted to support time-sharing between the processing mechanisms of the two stimuli rather than a single channel theory.

Download Full-text

Data Acquisition and Handling Unit for a Quantitative Use of Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100078699 ◽

1977 ◽

Vol 35 ◽

pp. 232-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

P. Trebbia ◽

P. Ballongue ◽

C. Colliex

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscope ◽

Energy Loss ◽

Electron Energy ◽

Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽

Single Channel ◽

Detection System ◽

Surface Barrier ◽

Solid State Detector ◽

Electrostatic Mirror ◽

Electron Energy Loss

An effective use of electron energy loss spectroscopy for chemical characterization of selected areas in the electron microscope can only be achieved with the development of quantitative measurements capabilities.The experimental assembly, which is sketched in Fig.l, has therefore been carried out. It comprises four main elements.The analytical transmission electron microscope is a conventional microscope fitted with a Castaing and Henry dispersive unit (magnetic prism and electrostatic mirror). Recent modifications include the improvement of the vacuum in the specimen chamber (below 10-6 torr) and the adaptation of a new electrostatic mirror.The detection system, similar to the one described by Hermann et al (1), is located in a separate chamber below the fluorescent screen which visualizes the energy loss spectrum. Variable apertures select the electrons, which have lost an energy AE within an energy window smaller than 1 eV, in front of a surface barrier solid state detector RTC BPY 52 100 S.Q. The saw tooth signal delivered by a charge sensitive preamplifier (decay time of 5.10-5 S) is amplified, shaped into a gaussian profile through an active filter and counted by a single channel analyser.

Download Full-text

Instrumentation for Measurement of Lingual Strength

Journal of Speech and Hearing Research ◽

10.1044/jshr.1101.189 ◽

1968 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 189-193 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Lois Joan Sanders

Keyword(s):

Single Channel ◽

Displacement Transducer ◽

Tongue Pressure ◽

Maximum Pressure ◽

Research Use ◽

Direct Writing ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Pressure Unit ◽

Force Displacement ◽

Consistent Response

A tongue pressure unit for measurement of lingual strength and patterns of tongue pressure is described. It consists of a force displacement transducer, a single channel, direct writing recording system, and a specially designed tongue pressure disk, head stabilizer, and pressure unit holder. Calibration with known weights indicated an essentially linear and consistent response. An evaluation of subject reliability in which 17 young adults were tested on two occasions revealed no significant difference in maximum pressure exerted during the two test trials. Suggestions for clinical and research use of the instrumentation are noted.

Download Full-text