Reinforcement optimization of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement

2016 ◽  
pp. 403-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Qing ◽  
Zhi-Min Hu ◽  
Run-Hong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Concrete Pavement

Early Age Performance of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement with Different Types of Aggregate

1997 ◽  
Vol 1568 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-43
Author(s):  
Yoon-Ho Cho ◽  
Terry Dossey ◽  
B. Frank Mccullough
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Field Test ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Concrete Pavement ◽  
Crack Spacing ◽  
Winter Period ◽  
Thermal Coefficient ◽  
Curing Methods ◽  
Pavement Construction ◽  
New Variables

The effect of coarse aggregate on pavement performance has been attributed to the volume of aggregate used in pavement construction. The different patterns of crack development for limestone (LS) and siliceous river gravel (SRG) are a typical example of aggregate-induced variable performance in continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP). An attempt was made to find a reasonable solution for pavements with SRG. As a way to solve the performance problem observed from the SRG pavement, a blended aggregates mixture was suggested. Laboratory and field tests were performed to check the feasibility of their application in pavements. From the laboratory test, a 50:50 blending ratio was suggested after considering the effect on tensile strength and thermal coefficient of expansion. Field test sections were also constructed to verify previous performance observations for the two aggregates and to provide performance data for new variables such as blended aggregates and special curing methods. Unexpectedly, the blended mixture did not improve the performance of SRG pavement; rather it experienced worse cracking than SRG alone. A controlled experiment with additional field test sections is needed to verify or disprove this finding. The only definitive finding was that selection of aggregate in the concrete pavement is a vital consideration for the design of the pavement. The CRCP8 analytical program reasonably predicted crack spacing for both SRG and LS pavements, predicting mean crack spacing of 0.99 m (3.25 ft) for SRG and 1.98 m (6.41 ft) for the limestone. These values are somewhat below the actual spacing observed at 100 days. Data collected after the first winter period will be required to calibrate the program.

scholarly journals Transverse Crack Behavior in Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement with Basalt Fiber Reinforcement

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 7458
Author(s):  
Yating Zhang ◽  
Zhiyi Huang
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Crack Width ◽  
Basalt Fiber ◽  
Concrete Pavement ◽  
Crack Spacing ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Crack Behavior ◽  
Reinforcement Content

Continuously reinforced concrete pavement (CRCP) is a pavement structure with a high performance and long service life. However, the corrosion of the longitudinal steel can result in a poor bond relationship between the steel and the concrete, affecting the load transfer efficiency between the adjacent panels and being responsible for the development of CRCP distresses. Basalt fiber-reinforced polymer (BFRP) is corrosion-resistant and has the potential to be used in CRCP. In this paper, the layout of a CRCP test section with BFRP bars constructed on G330 National Road in Zhejiang Province, China, is presented. An analytical model is proposed to predict the crack behavior of CRCP with BFRP reinforcement, with the predicted results are compared to field-measured ones. A sensitivity analysis of the BFRP design parameters on the crack spacing and crack width is conducted as well. The results show that the mean values for field-measured crack spacing and crack width are 4.85 m and 1.30 mm, respectively, which are higher than the results for traditional CRCP with steel due to the lower elastic modulus of BFRP. The analytical predictions agree reasonably well with the crack survey results. The higher the elastic modulus of BFRP, the reinforcement content (with both BFRP spacing and diameter related), and the bond stiffness coefficient between the BFRP and concrete, the less the crack spacing and crack width will be. Given the same or similar reinforcement content, a lower diameter with a smaller spacing is recommended because of its contribution to a smaller crack spacing and width.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document