scholarly journals SUN-297 Development of a Local Reference Range for Hypertonic Saline-Stimulated Copeptin

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily K Brooks ◽  
Caroline Bachmeier ◽  
Juanita Vorster ◽  
Jane Sorbello ◽  
Faseeha C Peer ◽  
...  

Abstract Differentiating between primary polydipsia and central diabetes insipidus (DI) can be challenging. The water deprivation test has traditionally been used to diagnosis DI, however has poor diagnostic accuracy (1). Direct measurement of anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) is limited clinically. Copeptin is the C-terminal glycoprotein moiety of ADH prohormone, and correlates well with plasma ADH. Unlike ADH, copeptin is easy to measure (2). Hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin measurements have recently been described for the diagnosis of central DI. A copeptin cut-off of >4.9 pmol/L has a diagnostic accuracy of 96.5% for distinguishing primary polydipsia from central DI (3). A copeptin assay has recently been established in our laboratory. Validation of hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin concentrations in our local population is needed before this test can be used with confidence in patients presenting to our institution with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. The aim of this study was to develop a local reference range for hypertonic saline-stimulated copeptin in healthy volunteers. Twenty healthy volunteers (10 male and 10 female) were recruited. Subjects underwent a hypertonic saline test, as previously described (3). Hypertonic saline (3%) was administered as an initial 250 mL bolus followed by 0.15 mL/kg/minute until a target serum sodium of ≥150 mmol/L was reached. At this time, blood was drawn for copeptin. Twelve healthy volunteers (7 females; 5 males) have undergone the study to date. Median age was 28 years (range 26-50); median body weight 75.7 kg (range 57.9 -94.5); median baseline plasma sodium 138 mmol/L (range 136 - 140) and median serum osmolality 289.5 (range 281-297). Median peak sodium was 152 mmol/L (range 150-154) with osmolality 314.5 mmol/kg (range 306-320). Median volume of hypertonic saline infused was 1583 mL (1230-2177) and median hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin was 29.2 pmol/L (9.6-167.4). Overall symptom burden was 5/10 (range 3/10-9/10). There were no serious adverse events. Development of a local reference range for hypertonic saline stimulated copeptin measurements will assist in interpretation of the test in our local population of patients presenting with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. References 1. Fenske W, Quinkler M, Lorenz D, Zopf K, Haagen U, Papassotiriou et al. Copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome- revisiting the direct and indirect water deprivation tests. JCEM. 2011;96:1506-1515 2. Timper K, Fenske W, Kuhn F, Frech N, Arici B, Rutishauser J et al. Diagnostic accuracy of copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: a prospective multicenter study. JCEM. 2015;100:2268-2274 3. Fenske, W, Refardt J, Chifu I, Schnyder I, Winzeler B, Drummond J. A copeptin-based approach in the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus. NEJM. 2018;379:428-439

2019 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. R11-R21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjam Christ-Crain

Diabetes insipidus (DI), be it from central or nephrogenic origin, must be differentiated from secondary forms of hypotonic polyuria such as primary polydipsia. Differentiation is crucial since wrong treatment can have deleterious consequences. Since decades, the gold standard for differentiation has been the water deprivation test, which has limitations leading to an overall unsatisfying diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, it is cumbersome for patients with a long test duration. Clinical signs and symptoms and MRI characteristics overlap between patients with DI and primary polydipsia. The direct test including vasopressin (AVP) measurement upon osmotic stimulation was meant to overcome these limitations, but failed to enter clinical practice mainly due to technical constraints of the AVP assay. Copeptin is secreted in equimolar amount to AVP but can easily be measured with a sandwich immunoassay. A high correlation between copeptin and AVP has been shown. Accordingly, copeptin mirrors the amount of AVP in the circulation and has led to a ‘revival’ of the direct test in the differential diagnosis of DI. We have shown that a baseline copeptin, without prior thirsting, unequivocally identifies patients with nephrogenic DI. In contrast, for the differentiation between central DI and primary polydipsia, a stimulated copeptin level of 4.9 pmol/L upon hypertonic saline infusion differentiates these two entities with a high diagnostic accuracy and is superior to the water deprivation test. Close sodium monitoring during the test is a prerequisite. Further new test methods are currently evaluated and might provide an even simpler way of differential diagnosis in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A637-A637
Author(s):  
Clara Odilia Sailer ◽  
Julie Refardt ◽  
Claudine Angela Blum ◽  
Ingeborg Schnyder ◽  
Jose Alberto Molina-Tijeras ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Copeptin is used in the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus. Different copeptin immunoassays exist but inter-assay comparability is unclear. The aim of this study was to correlate three commercially available copeptin assays and their diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia-syndrome. Methods: Analyzed data include three different studies: repeated copeptin measures of 8 healthy volunteers undergoing osmotic stimulation; copeptin measures of 40 patients hospitalized with pneumonia; osmotically stimulated copeptin measures of 40 patients with polyuria-polydipsia-syndrome. Copeptin was measured using the automated B.R.A.H.M.S. KRYPTOR, the manual B.R.A.H.M.S. LIA and the manual Cloud Clone ELISA assay. Primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy in the polyuria-polydipsia-syndrome. Results: In total, 150 copeptin measurements were analyzed. In healthy volunteers, there was a moderate correlation for the KRYPTOR and LIA (interrater correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.74; 95%-CI 0.07-0.91), and a poor correlation for the KRYPTOR and ELISA (ICC 0.07; 95%-CI -0.06-0.29), as for the LIA and ELISA (ICC 0.04; 95%-CI -0.04-0.17). The KRYPTOR had the highest diagnostic accuracy (98% (95%-CI: 83-100)), comparable to the LIA (88% (95%-CI: 74-100)), while the ELISA had a poor diagnostic accuracy (55% (95%-CI: 34-68)) in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia-syndrome. Conclusion: The KRYPTOR and LIA yield comparable copeptin levels and a high diagnostic accuracy, while the ELISA correlates poorly with the other two assays and shows a poor diagnostic accuracy between polyuria-polydipsia patients. Redefining cut-off levels for copeptin assays other than KRYPTOR and LIA must take place before their use in the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-409
Author(s):  
Laura Potasso ◽  
Julie Refardt ◽  
Irina Chifu ◽  
Martin Fassnacht ◽  
Wiebke Kristin Fenske ◽  
...  

Objective Hyperkalemia has been reported upon different hypertonic saline infusion protocols. Since hypertonic saline test has recently been validated for the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus (DI), we aimed to investigate the course of plasma potassium during the test. Design We analyzed data of 90 healthy volunteers and 141 patients with polyuria–polydipsia syndrome (PPS) from two prospective studies evaluating the hypertonic saline test. Our primary outcome was the incidence rate of hypertonic saline-induced hyperkalemia > 5 mmol/L. Methods Participants received a 250 mL bolus of 3% NaCl solution, followed by 0.15 mL/min/kg body weight continuously infused targeting a plasma sodium level of 150 mmol/L. Blood samples and clinical data were collected every 30 min. Results Of the 231 participants, 16% (n = 37/231) developed hyperkalemia. The incidence of hyperkalemia was higher in healthy volunteers and in patients with primary polydipsia (25.6% (n = 23/90) and 9.9% (n = 14/141), respectively), and only occurred in 3.4% (n = 2/59) of patients with diabetes insipidus. Hyperkalemia developed mostly at or after 90-min test duration (81.1%, n => 30/37). Predictors of hyperkalemia (OR (95% CI)) were male sex (2.9 (1.2–7.4), P => 0.02), a plasma potassium at baseline > 3.9 mmol/L (5.2 (1.8–17.3), P => 0.004), normonatremia at 30-min test duration (3.2 (1.2–9.5), P => 0.03), and an increase in potassium levels already at 30-min test duration as compared to baseline (4.5 (1.7–12.3), P => 0.003). Hyperkalemia was transient and resolved spontaneously in all cases. Conclusion The hypertonic saline test can lead to hyperkalemia, especially in patients with primary polydipsia who experience a longer test duration. Monitoring potassium levels in these patients is recommended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Odilia Sailer ◽  
Julie Refardt ◽  
Claudine Angela Blum ◽  
Ingeborg Schnyder ◽  
Jose Alberto Molina-Tijeras ◽  
...  

AbstractThe aim of this study was to correlate three commercially available copeptin assays and their diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. Analyzed data include repeated copeptin measures of 8 healthy volunteers and 40 patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome undergoing osmotic stimulation and of 40 patients hospitalized with pneumonia. Copeptin was measured using the automated Brahms KRYPTOR, the manual Brahms LIA and the manual Cloud Clone ELISA assay. Primary outcome was the interrater correlation coefficient (ICC) and diagnostic accuracy in the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome of the three assays. In healthy volunteers, there was a moderate correlation for the KRYPTOR and LIA (ICC 0.74; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.91), and a poor correlation for the KRYPTOR and ELISA (ICC 0.07; 95% CI − 0.06 to 0.29), as for the LIA and ELISA (ICC 0.04; 95% CI − 0.04 to 0.17). The KRYPTOR had the highest diagnostic accuracy (98% (95% CI 83 to100)), comparable to the LIA (88% (95% CI 74 to 100)), while the ELISA had a poor diagnostic accuracy (55% (95% CI 34 to 68)) in the differential diagnosis of the polyuria-polydipsia syndrome. The KRYPTOR and LIA yield comparable copeptin concentrations and high diagnostic accuracy, while the ELISA correlates poorly with the other two assays and shows a poor diagnostic accuracy for polyuria-polydipsia patients. The current copeptin cut-off is valid for the KRYPTOR and LIA assay. Our results indicate that interpretation with other assays should be performed with caution and separate validation studies are required before their use in differentiating patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome.Trial registration: NCT02647736 January 6, 2016/NCT01940614 September 12, 2013/NCT00973154 September 9, 2009.


1981 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Anne Hendricks ◽  
Barbara Lippe ◽  
Solomon A. Kaplan ◽  
W-N. Paul Lee

Author(s):  
Emily Brooks ◽  
Caroline Bachmeier ◽  
Juanita Vorster ◽  
Jane Sorbello ◽  
Faseeha Peer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 1501-1506
Author(s):  
Julie Refardt ◽  
Clara Odilia Sailer ◽  
Bettina Winzeler ◽  
Matthias Johannes Betz ◽  
Irina Chifu ◽  
...  

The pathomechanism of primary polydipsia is poorly understood. Recent animal data reported a connection between fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) and elevated fluid intake independently of hormonal control by the hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and osmotic stimulation. We therefore compared circulating FGF-21 levels in patients with primary polydipsia to patients with AVP deficiency (central diabetes insipidus) and healthy volunteers. In this prospective cohort study, we analyzed FGF-21 levels of 20 patients with primary polydipsia, 20 patients with central diabetes insipidus and 20 healthy volunteers before and after stimulation with hypertonic saline infusion targeting a plasma sodium level ≥150 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the difference in FGF-21 levels between the three groups. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for patients with central diabetes insipidus being heavier. There was no difference in baseline FGF-21 levels between patients with primary polydipsia and healthy volunteers (122 pg/mL (52,277) vs 193 pg/mL (48,301), but higher levels in patients with central diabetes insipidus were observed (306 pg/mL (114,484); P = 0.037). However, this was not confirmed in a multivariate linear regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex, BMI and smoking status. Osmotic stimulation did not affect FGF-21 levels in either group (difference to baseline: primary polydipsia −23 pg/mL (−43, 22); central diabetes insipidus 17 pg/mL (−76, 88); healthy volunteers −6 pg/mL (−68, 22); P = 0.45). To conclude, FGF-21 levels are not increased in patients with primary polydipsia as compared to central diabetes insipidus or healthy volunteers. FGF-21 therefore does not seem to be causal of elevated fluid intake in these patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document