scholarly journals Improvement of Treatment Resistant Depression in a Patient With Primary Hypothyroidism and Thr92Ala5’ Type 2 Deiodinase Gene Polymorphism With Multiple Daily Doses of Triiodothyronine

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A937-A937
Author(s):  
Ziyan Ahmed ◽  
Rinsha P V Sherin ◽  
Tatiana De Lourdes Fonseca ◽  
Thanh Duc Hoang ◽  
Mohamed K M Shakir

Abstract Introduction: The augmentation pharmacologic therapy used in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) includes drugs such as lithium, buspirone, triiodothyronine (LT3) and other drugs. We report a patient with TRD and primary hypothyroidism who responded to a combination of LT3, given in divided doses, and levothyroxine (LT4), rather than LT4 alone, even though the serum TSH levels were in the normal range with these treatments. Interestingly, the patient had a Thr92Ala5’ type 2 deiodinase polymorphism. Case Report: A 54-year old male presented to our emergency room with suicidal ideation 8 years ago. The patient had severe depression and developed uncontrollable urges to surf the internet, generally prohibited sites, approximately 3 months prior to his visit to the emergency room. He had noted a 12-lbs weight gain, cold intolerance, dry skin, and excessive sleepiness for 3 months. Patient was admitted to the psychiatry ward and laboratory testing showed a serum TSH 180 µIU/mL, FT4 0.48 ng/dL, total T3 46 ng/mL, and TPO antibody 278 IU/mL. A thyroid ultrasound was consistent with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. A diagnosis of major depressive disorder and primary hypothyroidism was made. He was started on citalopram (20 mg/day) and levothyroxine (175 mcg/day). The Beck Depression Scores (BDS) during the initial weeks was 37.5 ± 5.1 (Mean ± SD) (normal 0-9) with corresponding TSH 164 ± 133 µIU/mL, FT4 0.70 ± 0.25 ng/dL, and total T3 61 ± 7.9 ng/mL. Two weeks later the dose of citalopram was increased to 40 mg/day and then buspirone 10 mg/day was added. At the end of 11 months the BDS was 27.81 ± 2.1 with a corresponding TSH 1.5 ± 0.1 µIU/mL. After 4 months, 7.5 mg of aripiprazole was added. After 11 months of treatment, he was treated with a combination of LT4 + LT3 (5 mcg once daily) and TSH became 0.76 ± 0.1 µIU/mL with a corresponding BDS of 18.0 ± 1.9. Twelve months later, the patient was switched back to LT4 alone and during LT4 treatment the BDS score was 24.2 ± 22.2 with a TSH of 1.44 ± 0.11. Nine months later patient was changed to LT4 + LT3 (5 mcg three times daily) and his BDS score was 10.3 ± 1.2 with a TSH of 0.72 ± 0.09 µIU/mL. When he was on LT4 + LT3 TID he was able to discontinue all the antidepressant drugs and he had no urge to surf on internet. His depression was controlled by over-the-counter antidepressant drugs (S-adenosylmethionine and rhodiola). A genetic test confirmed Thr92Ala5’ type 2 deiodinase polymorphism. Discussion and Conclusion: In our patient, there was a good correlation between the BDS improvement and the serum T3 levels (r: -0.7 p-value: 0.01). Thus, in patient with Thr92Ala5’ type 2 deiodinase polymorphism TID T3 dosing may significantly improve depression. Additional studies are needed.

Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbri ◽  
Saskia P. Hagenaars ◽  
Catherine John ◽  
Alexander T. Williams ◽  
Nick Shrine ◽  
...  

AbstractTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major contributor to the disability caused by major depressive disorder (MDD). Primary care electronic health records provide an easily accessible approach to investigate TRD clinical and genetic characteristics. MDD defined from primary care records in UK Biobank (UKB) and EXCEED studies was compared with other measures of depression and tested for association with MDD polygenic risk score (PRS). Using prescribing records, TRD was defined from at least two switches between antidepressant drugs, each prescribed for at least 6 weeks. Clinical-demographic characteristics, SNP-based heritability (h2SNP) and genetic overlap with psychiatric and non-psychiatric traits were compared in TRD and non-TRD MDD cases. In 230,096 and 8926 UKB and EXCEED participants with primary care data, respectively, the prevalence of MDD was 8.7% and 14.2%, of which 13.2% and 13.5% was TRD, respectively. In both cohorts, MDD defined from primary care records was strongly associated with MDD PRS, and in UKB it showed overlap of 71–88% with other MDD definitions. In UKB, TRD vs healthy controls and non-TRD vs healthy controls h2SNP was comparable (0.25 [SE = 0.04] and 0.19 [SE = 0.02], respectively). TRD vs non-TRD was positively associated with the PRS of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, with lower socio-economic status, obesity, higher neuroticism and other unfavourable clinical characteristics. This study demonstrated that MDD and TRD can be reliably defined using primary care records and provides the first large scale population assessment of the genetic, clinical and demographic characteristics of TRD.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Fabbri ◽  
Saskia P Hagenaars ◽  
Catherine John ◽  
Alexander T Williams ◽  
Nick Shrine ◽  
...  

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a major contributor to the disability caused by major depressive disorder (MDD). Using primary care electronic health records from UK Biobank and EXCEED studies, we defined MDD and TRD, providing an easily accessible approach to investigate their clinical and genetic characteristics. MDD defined from primary care records was compared with other measures of depression and validated using the MDD polygenic risk score (PRS). Using prescribing records, TRD was defined from at least two switches between antidepressant drugs, each prescribed for at least six weeks. Clinical-demographic characteristics, SNP-heritability and genetic overlap with psychiatric and non-psychiatric traits were compared in TRD and non-TRD MDD cases. In 230,096 and 8,926 UKB and EXCEED participants with primary care data, respectively, the prevalence of MDD was 8.7% and 14.2%, of which 13.2% and 13.5% was TRD (2,430 and 159 cases), respectively. In both cohorts, MDD defined from primary care records was strongly associated with MDD PRS, and in UKB it showed overlap of 72%-88% with other MDD definitions. In UKB, TRD and non-TRD heritability was comparable (h2SNP = 0.25 [SE=0.04] and 0.19 [SE=0.02], respectively). TRD was positively associated with the polygenic risk score (PRS) of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and negatively associated with the PRS of intelligence compared to non-TRD. It was more strongly associated with unfavourable clinical-demographic variables than non-TRD. This study demonstrated that MDD and TRD can be reliably defined using primary care records and provides the first large scale population assessment of the genetic, clinical and demographic characteristics of TRD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Era Catur Prasetya ◽  
Lestari Basoeki

Treatment-resistant depression occurs in about 20% of all Major Deppresion Disorder patients. In addition to the high cost of treatment to be borne, the high functional disability rate, the suicide rate triggered by the disorder is also quite large. Various efforts were made to overcome this, including dose optimization and duration of treatment, substitution of drug selection, combination therapy and augmentation using non-antidepressant drugs and bilateral electroconvulsion therapy. Current pharmacological options according to some experts are no more efficacious than the 1950s. Clearly, a novel therapeutic approach to treatment - resistant depression disorders is urgently needed. Over the last few decades, there has been a renewed interest in focal neuromodulation as a treatment approach for neuropsychiatric conditions. The neuromodulation-based interventions discussed include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), which are non invasive intervention therapy and Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), which are invasive interventional therapies. This literature review proves that, although today only TMS and VNS have been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States, but neuromodilation-based intervention therapy has proven to be promising as a more effective and efficient resistant depression therapy in the future.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 616-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Fedgchin ◽  
Madhukar Trivedi ◽  
Ella J Daly ◽  
Rama Melkote ◽  
Rosanne Lane ◽  
...  

Abstract Background About one-third of patients with depression fail to achieve remission despite treatment with multiple antidepressants and are considered to have treatment-resistant depression. Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, multicenter study enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe depression and nonresponse to ≥2 antidepressants in the current depression episode. Eligible patients (N = 346) were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-weekly nasal spray treatment (esketamine [56 or 84 mg] or placebo) plus a newly initiated, open-label, oral antidepressant taken daily for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score, performed by blinded, remote raters. Based on the predefined statistical testing sequence, esketamine 84 mg/antidepressant had to be significant for esketamine 56 mg/antidepressant to be formally tested. Results Statistical significance was not achieved with esketamine 84 mg/antidepressant compared with antidepressant/placebo (least squares [LS] means difference [95% CI]: –3.2 [–6.88, 0.45]; 2-sided P value = .088). Although esketamine 56 mg/antidepressant could not be formally tested, the LS means difference was –4.1 [–7.67, –0.49] (nominal 2-sided P value = .027). The most common (>20%) adverse events reported for esketamine/antidepressant were nausea, dissociation, dizziness, vertigo, and headache. Conclusions Statistical significance was not achieved for the primary endpoint; nevertheless, the treatment effect (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) for both esketamine/antidepressant groups exceeded what has been considered clinically meaningful for approved antidepressants vs placebo. Safety was similar between esketamine/antidepressant groups and no new dose-related safety concerns were identified. This study provides supportive evidence for the safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray as a new, rapid-acting antidepressant for patients with treatment-resistant depression. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02417064


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document