Conservative Treatment of Patients with Acoustic Tumors

Neurosurgery ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 646-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua B. Bederson ◽  
Klaus von Ammon ◽  
Werner W. Wichmann ◽  
Gazi M. Yasargil
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
High Incidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Slow Growing

Abstract Seventy of 178 patients with acoustic tumors initially were treated conservatively and have been followed up for an average of 26 ± 2 months. The tumor size was determined by the mean maximum anteroposterior and mediolateral diameters, using computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained sequentially throughout the follow-up period. The average tumor growth was 1.6 ± 0.4 mm the 1st year, and 1.9 ± 1.0 mm the 2nd year (range, -2 to 17 mm/y): 4 tumors showed apparent regression, 28 (40%) had no detectable growth, and 37 (53%) exhibited growth (average, 3.8 ± 1.2 mm/y). Within individual patients, the tumor growth rate determined during the 1st year of follow-up was predictive of tumor growth rate during the following year. Rapid tumor growth or clinical deterioration in 9 of the 70 patients (13%) who initially were treated conservatively necessitated subsequent surgery an average of 14 ± 5 months after the patient was initially seen. This group had a larger initial tumor size (27.0 ± 3.4 mm vs. 21.3 ± 0.9 mm, P<0.05), and a faster 1-year growth rate (7.9 ± 2.3 mm/y vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 mm/y, P<0.05) than the 61 patients who did not require surgery. Two patients, however, experienced neurological deterioration that required surgery, even though there was no tumor growth. The high incidence of acoustic tumors with no detectable growth or apparent spontaneous regression must be taken into account when evaluating the indications for surgery and the efficacy of radiotherapy. Beacuse surgery carries some risk and acoustic tumors are generally slow growing, a trial of conservative treatment is possible in selected patients, provided serial radiological studies are obtained. Knowledge of the tumor growth rate established by these studies may be helpful in the treatment of individual patients.

Growth kinetics and outcomes of cT1b renal masses under active surveillance.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 440-440
Author(s):  
Reza Mehrazin ◽  
Marc C. Smaldone ◽  
Alexander Kutikov ◽  
Jeffrey J. Tomaszewski ◽  
Tianyu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Growth Kinetics ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Renal Masses ◽  
Delayed Intervention

440 Background: The natural history of untreated T1b renal masses is poorly understood. We assessed the growth kinetics and outcomes of ≥cT1b cortical renal tumors which continue to remain on radiographic AS compared to those who underwent definitive surgery after a period of AS. Methods: Prospectively maintained, renal tumor database was reviewed to identify enhancing solid and cystic masses managed expectantly from 2000-2012. cT1a masses, transitional cell carcinoma or those suspected for metastatic disease were excluded from analysis. Localized tumors > 4.0 cm (≥T1b) that were radiographically followed for > 6 months were included for analysis. Clinical and pathological records were reviewed to determine tumor growth rate and clinical outcomes in those remained on AS or those who underwent delayed intervention. Mean for tumor size on presentation, annual linear tumor growth rate (LGR), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and follow-up (FU) were calculated. Chi−square test & Logistic regression were used for uni- and multi-variable analyses. Results: Of 457 pts managed with AS, 67 cT1b tumors (in 63 patients) were identified. 43 pts (67%) were managed solely with AS, while 21 pts (33%) progressed to intervention. The median age at presentation pts managed with AS and intervention was 77 and 60 yrs respectively (p=0.0002), while no difference was observed in median CCI (3 vs. 2, p=0.6). No difference was observed in tumor size at presentation between pts managed with AS and those undergoing delayed intervention (5.9 vs. 5.4 cm, p=0.8). In contrast, the mean LGR significantly differed between pts managed expectantly and pts progressed to intervention (0.37 vs. 0.73 cm/yr; p=0.02). On MVA, age (OR=0.9,CI:0.8−0.98) and LGR (OR=11,CI:1.8−60) were significant predictors of surgical intervention. With a mean FU period of 38.9 ± 24.0 months (6−105), 9 pts died (14%) from other cause and no pt progressed to metastatic disease. Conclusions: Localized cT1b≥ renal masses show comparable growth rates to small tumors managed expectantly with low rates of progression to metastatic disease with short term follow up. An initial period of AS to determine tumor growth kinetics is a reasonable option in select pts with significant competing risks and limited life expectancy.

Conservative Management of Bilateral Vestibular Schwannomas in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Patients: Hearing and Tumor Growth Results

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 907-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthieu Peyre ◽  
Stéphane Goutagny ◽  
Alpha Bah ◽  
Daniele Bernardeschi ◽  
Béatrice Larroque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type ◽  
Neurofibromatosis Type 2 ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND: As new treatment modalities develop for the management of vestibular schwannomas (VS) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, it remains crucial to ascertain the natural history of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between hearing and tumor growth in patients undergoing conservative VS management. METHODS: Patients harboring bilateral VS with at least 1 year of radiological follow-up were selected. Conservative management was proposed based on the small tumor size and/or serviceable hearing at presentation. Tumor size was calculated by using the 2-component box model and reported as mean tumor diameter. Hearing was evaluated by using pure-tone average and the American Academy of Otololaryngologists and Head and Neck Surgery classification. RESULTS: Forty-six patients harboring 92 VS were included. The mean clinical and radiological follow-up times were 6.0 and 4.2 years, respectively. The mean tumor diameter was 13 mm at presentation and 20 mm at the end of follow-up. Mean tumor growth rate was 1.8 mm/year. During follow-up, 17 patients (37%) underwent surgery for VS. Surgery-free rate for VS was 88% at 5 years. The number of patients with at least 1 serviceable ear was 39 (85%) at presentation and 34 (74%) at the end of follow-up, including 22 (66%) with binaural serviceable hearing maintained. There was no statistical correlation between tumor growth rate and preservation of serviceable hearing. Tumor growth rates and age at presentation were inversely correlated. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the high variability among neurofibromatosis type 2 patients regarding hearing status and VS growth rate and justifies the choice of initial conservative management in selected cases.

Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 662-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wissame El Bakkouri ◽  
Romain E. Kania ◽  
Jean-Pierre Guichard ◽  
Guillaume Lot ◽  
Philippe Herman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Imaging Study ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Slow Growth Rate ◽  
Delay In Diagnosis

Object The object of this study was to evaluate the natural history, pattern, and occurrence of tumor growth and its consequences for treatment of small-sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs). Methods From 1990 to 2005, 386 patients underwent conservative management for VS because of the following: age > 60 years, poor health/medical risks, risk of deterioration of good hearing, small tumor size, minimal or no incapacitating symptoms, and/or patient preference. Tumor size was measured by MR imaging according to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium. The first MR imaging study was performed 1 year after diagnosis, and subsequent imaging was performed yearly or every 2 years depending on the appearance of new symptoms, tumor growth, or both. Results Sixty-one patients were lost to follow-up the first year after presentation. Of the 325 patients for whom 1-year follow-up data were available, 39 showed tumor growth ≥ 3 mm. Conservative management was discontinued for these 39 patients. The patients who returned for follow-up were evaluated at 1- or 2-year intervals depending on tumor growth. The authors extrapolated to obtain data for 2-year intervals, yielding data for 160, 56, 21, and 8 patients at 3, 5, 7, and 9 years after initial presentation, respectively. The overall mean tumor growth rate (±standard deviation) was 1.15 ± 2.4 mm/year. This rate was estimated by pooling all values of tumor growth that had been determined for all patients and dividing by the total number of “events,” with each assessment constituting an event. In 58.6% of patients, the annual tumor growth rate was < 1 mm/year; in 29.2%, 1–3 mm/year; and in 12.2%, ≥ 3 mm/ year. The growth rates of intrameatal (1.02 ± 1.8 mm/year) and extrameatal (1.40 ± 3.1 mm/year) tumors did not differ significantly. No significant association was found between tumor growth rate and sex, age, initial hearing status, or initial tumor grade. Delay in diagnosis was the only significant factor associated with tumor growth rate. During follow-up, conservative management was discontinued for 77 (23.7%) of the 325 patients for whom at least 12-month follow-up data were available; surgery was performed in 60 (77.9%) and radiation therapy in 17 (22.1%). Conclusions The results of this study support the role of a conservative “wait-and-scan” policy of management for small-sized VSs because most have a slow growth rate. Long-term neuroimaging follow-up is needed even with non-growing tumors.

Predictive value of tumor growth rate during previous treatment for tumor response to regorafenib (REGO) and trifluridine/tipiracil (TFTD) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 766-766
Author(s):  
Takeshi Kawakami ◽  
Toshiki Masuishi ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawamoto ◽  
Katsuhiro Omae ◽  
Tetsuhito Muranaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Treatment Period ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Target Lesion ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Slow Growing

766 Background: Although REGO and TFTD have been recognized as standard salvage treatments for patients (pts) with refractory mCRC, it is still unclear which drug should be used first. Tumor growth rate (TGR) during the pre-treatment period is associated with survival in lung and laryngeal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. However, little is known about the association between TGR during the pre-treatment period and tumor response to REGO and TFTD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive mCRC pts who were treated with REGO or TFTD at three institutions. We classified pts into slow-growing (SG) or rapid-growing (RG) groups according to TGR, and appearance of new lesions (NL+) or their absence (NL–) during the pre-treatment period. TGR was calculated as follows: TGR = (D1 − D0)/100D0 (CT1 − CT0), where CT1 is the date of computed tomography (CT) at progressive disease, CT0 is the date of CT before CT1, and Dn is the sum of target lesion diameters at CTn (according to RECIST version 1.1). SG was defined as NL– with a low TGR ( < 0.33), and RG was defined as NL− with a high TGR (≥0.33) or NL+, irrespective of TGR. Results: A total of 244 pts (RG/SG: 133/111, REGO/TFTD: 132/112) were eligible. The proportion of RG pts with a long duration from first-line chemotherapy and SG pts with elevated ALP was higher in the REGO group, while the proportion of SG pts with poor PS was higher in the TFTD group. The disease control rate (DCR) was similar in both groups (REGO 29% vs TFTD 23%, p = 0.556) among RG pts, while the DCR of TFTD was significantly better than REGO in SG pts In a multivariate analysis of predictive factors for DCR, drug selection was an independent factor for DCR in SG pts (odds ratio 3.51; 95% CI 1.33-9.27; p = 0.011). In RG group, DCRs of NL+ pts were worse than that of NL- pts (16% vs 36% in REGO group, p = 0.109; 9% vs. 31% in TFTD group, 0.108). Conclusions: TGR during the pre-treatment period would be helpful in selecting between REGO and TFTD, especially for pts with slow-growing tumors. Pts with appearance of new lesions may not benefit from either REGO or TFTD as salvage treatment.

Tumor Progression Following Petroclival Meningioma Subtotal Resection: A Volumetric Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob B Hunter ◽  
Brendan P O’Connell ◽  
Matthew L Carlson ◽  
Lola C Chambless ◽  
Robert J Yawn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Volumetric Growth ◽  
Petroclival Meningioma ◽  
Petroclival Meningiomas ◽  
The Mean

Abstract BACKGROUND One study has investigated postoperative growth rates following subtotal resection of petroclival meningiomas utilizing linear measurements, which are insensitive to the multidimensional complex growth of meningiomas, to estimate tumor volume. OBJECTIVE To describe petroclival meningioma growth patterns following less-than-complete resection utilizing volumetric analysis and to identify variables associated with tumor progression. METHODS Patients with surgically resected WHO grade I petroclival meningiomas were retrospectively reviewed (1999-2015). Image analysis software was utilized to perform volumetric analyses of tumor size and growth on serial MRI studies. The impact of preoperative and postoperative variables on tumor growth after subtotal resection was analyzed. An increase in tumor volume of at least 20% was defined as “tumor growth.” RESULTS Twenty-three patients had immediate preoperative and serial postoperative MRI studies available for review. The mean preoperative tumor volume was 20.9 cm3 (range 0.4-54.6). The mean extent of resection was 75.5% (range 31.5%-100.0%). At a mean follow-up of 24.8 mo, 12 tumors (66.7%) exhibited radiological tumor growth, while 6 tumors did not change in size. The median annual volumetric growth rate was 2.82 cm3/yr (range –0.34 to 10.1). Extent of resection and immediate postoperative tumor volume were significantly correlated with the annual volumetric growth rate following resection. At last follow-up, 3 (13%) patients required further intervention. CONCLUSION The majority of petroclival meningiomas exhibit growth following subtotal resection. Extent of resection is strongly associated with risk for disease progression following surgery.

Comparison of aortic remodelling after conservative treatment or thoracic endovascular repair in type B dissections

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Migdat Mustafi ◽  
Mateja Andic ◽  
Oana Bartos ◽  
Gerd Grözinger ◽  
Christian Schlensak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type B ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our aim was to compare aortic remodelling in type B dissections after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) or conservative treatment. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of computed tomography (CT) data sets at dissection onset and at the last follow-up in a group with conservative (group A) and TEVAR treatment (group B). An additional analysis of the preoperative CT images was performed in patients from group A, who were converted to TEVAR during follow-up. Diameters and lengths of all aortic segments were measured and growth rates were calculated. RESULTS We included 74 patients: 50 patients in group A (follow-up time: 1625 ± 209 days) and 24 patients in group B (follow-up time: 554 ± 129 days). The mean aortic diameter growth rate was significantly higher in group A than in group B in the mid-descending aorta (A: +7 mm/year; B: −4 mm/year; P = 0.003). Length growth difference was only present in the abdominal aortic segment and was more pronounced in group A (+2 vs ±0 mm/year; P = 0.009). The conversion rate from conservative treatment to TEVAR was 36% (n = 18). A false lumen diameter of &gt;22 mm at baseline was associated with a higher rate of conversion (P = 0.036). After conversion, the mean growth rate in the proximal descending and mid-descending aorta decreased from preoperative +11 and +18 mm/year to postoperative −9 and −14 mm/year, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In acute type B dissections, TEVAR stops aortic enlargement in the thoracic aorta, but promotes distal dilatation compared to the conservative treatment group. After conversion to TEVAR in conservatively pretreated chronic type B dissections, a more pronounced diameter decrease in the descending aorta was observed than in patients treated in the acute phase.

scholarly journals Developing an optimal follow-up strategy based on the natural history of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 500-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Hee Kim ◽  
Yun-Sik Dho ◽  
Yong Hwy Kim ◽  
Jung Hyun Lee ◽  
Ji Hyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Natural History ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Visual Function ◽  
Pituitary Adenomas ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Volume Growth ◽  
Tumor Growth Rate ◽  
Mri Study

OBJECTIVEThe natural history and proper algorithm for follow-up testing of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (PAs) are not well known, despite their relatively high prevalence. The aim of this study was to suggest the optimal follow-up algorithm for nonfunctioning PAs based on their natural history.METHODSThe authors followed up 197 patients with nonfunctioning PAs that had not been treated (including surgery and radiation therapy) at the time of detection, in a single center, between March 2000 and February 2017. They conducted a hormone test, visual field test, and MRI at the time of diagnosis and yearly thereafter.RESULTSThe overall median follow-up duration was 37 months. Microadenomas (n = 38) did not cause visual disturbance, pituitary apoplexy, or endocrine dysfunction. The incidence of patients with tumor volume growth ≥ 20% was higher for macroadenomas than microadenomas (13.8 vs 5.0 per 100 person-years [PYs], p = 0.002). The median time to any tumor growth was 4.8 years (95% CI 3.4–4.8 years) for microadenomas and 4 years (95% CI 3.3–4.2 years) for macroadenomas. The overall incidence of worsening visual function was 0.69 per 100 PYs. Patients with a tumor volume growth rate ≥ 0.88 cm3/year (n = 20) had a higher incidence of worsening visual function (4.69 vs 0.30 per 100 PYs, p < 0.001). The tumor growth rate of all microadenomas was < 0.88 cm3/year. The median time to tumor growth ≥ 20% was 3.3 years (95% CI 1.8–3.9 years) in patients with a tumor growth rate ≥ 0.88 cm3/year and 4.9 years (95% CI 4.6–7.2 years) in patients with a tumor growth rate < 0.88 cm3/year.CONCLUSIONSThe authors have devised a follow-up strategy based on the tumor volume growth rate as well as initial tumor volume. In patients with microadenomas, the next MRI study can be performed at 3 years. In patients with macroadenomas, the second MRI study should be performed between 6 months and 1 year to assess the tumor growth rate. In patients with a tumor growth rate ≥ 0.88 cm3/year, the MRI study should be performed within 2 years. In patients with a tumor growth rate < 0.88 cm3/year, the MRI study can be delayed until 4 years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document