CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY COMPARED WITH FUSION IN A WORKERS' COMPENSATION POPULATION

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Steinmetz ◽  
Rakesh Patel ◽  
Vincent Traynelis ◽  
Daniel K. Resnick ◽  
Paul A. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Work Status ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Return To Activity

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy are often treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Cervical arthroplasty has recently been advocated as an alternative treatment. Theoretically, arthroplasty should permit early return to activity and protect against adjacent segment disease. Early mobilization and return to activity may, theoretically, reduce cost to the workers' compensation program. METHODS A subgroup analysis of workers' compensation patients from the randomized controlled trials comparing Prestige ST and Bryan (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) cervical arthroplasty to fusion was performed. Primary outcome measures were work status, time to return to work, and neck disability. Secondary outcome measures were neck and arm pain and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey score. RESULTS One thousand four patients were enrolled in the studies, 93 of whom were workers' compensation patients. At 6 weeks and 3 months, significantly more patients in the arthroplasty group were working compared with the fusion group. At 6 months and later, there was no significant difference in return-to-work rates. Overall, patients returned to work at a median of 101 days after arthroplasty, compared with 222 days after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. This difference was not significant when controlling for sex, study, and preoperative work status. At all time points, the Neck Disability Index was consistently lower in the arthroplasty group compared with the fusion group; however, the difference was not significant at 24 months. There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcomes, neurological events, or pain-related events. CONCLUSION In this workers' compensation cohort, it was observed that a greater number of patients in the arthroplasty group returned to work at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. A trend toward an earlier return to work was also seen, although this was not statistically significant when controlling for differences in the studies.

scholarly journals Headache relief after anterior cervical discectomy: post hoc analysis of a randomized investigational device exemption trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolph J. Schrot ◽  
Jesna S. Mathew ◽  
Yueju Li ◽  
Laurel Beckett ◽  
Hyun W. Bae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Preoperative Symptom ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Headache Relief ◽  
Upper Cervical ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Post Hoc

Object The authors analyzed headache relief after anterior cervical discectomy. Headache may be relieved after anterior cervical discectomy, but the mechanism is unknown. If headaches were directly referred from upper cervical pathology, more headache relief would be expected from surgery performed at higher cervical levels. If spinal kinesthetics were the mechanism, then headache relief may differ between arthroplasty and fusion. Headache relief after anterior cervical discectomy was quantified by the operated disc level and by the method of operation (arthroplasty vs arthrodesis). Methods The authors performed a post hoc analysis of an artificial disc trial. Data on headache pain were extracted from the Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire. Results A total of 260 patients underwent single-level arthroplasty or arthodesis. Preoperatively, 52% reported NDI headache scores of 3 or greater, compared with only 13%–17% postoperatively. The model-based mean NDI headache score at baseline was 2.5 (95% CI 2.3–2.7) and was reduced by 1.3 points after surgery (95% CI 1.2–1.4, p < 0.001). Higher cervical levels were associated with a greater degree of preoperative headache, but there was no association with headache relief. There was no significant difference in headache relief between arthroplasty and arthrodesis. Conclusions Most patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis have headache as a preoperative symptom (88%). Anterior cervical discectomy with both arthroplasty and arthrodesis is associated with a durable decrease in headache. Headache relief is not related to the level of operation. The mechanism for headache reduction remains unclear.

Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ung-Kyu Chang ◽  
Daniel H. Kim ◽  
Max C. Lee ◽  
Rafer Willenberg ◽  
Se-Hoon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Axial Rotation ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Artificial Disc ◽  
Lateral Bending ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Motion Modes ◽  
Adjacent Segments ◽  
The Prestige

Object Range of motion (ROM) changes were evaluated at the surgically treated and adjacent segments in cadaveric specimens treated with two different cervical artificial discs compared with those measured in intact spine and fusion models. Methods Eighteen cadaveric human cervical spines were tested in the intact state for the different modes of motion (extension, flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation) up to 2 Nm. Three groups of specimens (fitted with either the ProDisc-C or Prestige II cervical artificial disc or submitted to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF]) were tested after implantation at C6–7 level. The ROM values were measured at treated and adjacent segments, and these values were then compared with those measured in the intact spine. Results At the surgically treated segment, the ROM increased after arthroplasty compared with the intact spine in extension (54% in the ProDisc-C group, 47% in the Prestige group) and in flexion (27% in the ProDisc-C group, 10% in the Prestige group). In bending and rotation, the postarthroplasty ROMs were greater than those of the intact spine (10% in the ProDisc-C group and 55% in the Prestige group in bending, 17% in the ProDisc-C group and 50% in the Prestige group in rotation). At the adjacent levels the ROMs decreased in all specimens treated with either artificial disc in all modes of motion (< 10%) except for extension at the inferior the level (29% decrease for ProDisc-C implant, 12% decrease for Prestige disc). The ROM for all motion modes in the ACDF-treated spine decreased at the treated level (range 18–44%) but increased at the adjacent levels (range 3–20%). Conclusions Both ProDisc-C and Prestige artificial discs were associated with increased ROM at the surgically treated segment compared with the intact spine with or without significance for all modes of testing. In addition, adjacent-level ROM decreased in all modes of motion except extension in specimens fitted with both artificial discs.

Comparison of Complication Rates Associated with Two-Level Cervical Arthroplasty Versus Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. S139-S140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reginald J. Davis ◽  
Ali Araghi ◽  
Hyun W. Bae ◽  
Michael S. Hisey ◽  
Pierce D. Nunley
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Cervical Discectomy

Does smoking have an impact on fusion rate in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and rigid plate fixation?

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 527-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Luszczyk ◽  
Justin S. Smith ◽  
Jeffrey S. Fischgrund ◽  
Steven C. Ludwig ◽  
Rick C. Sasso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Disc ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Single Level ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Solid Fusion ◽  
Cervical Plate ◽  
Anterior Cervical Plate

Object Although smoking has been shown to negatively affect fusion rates in patients undergoing multilevel fusions of the cervical and lumbar spine, the effect of smoking on fusion rates in patients undergoing single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with allograft and plate fixation has yet to be thoroughly investigated. The objective of the present study was to address the effect of smoking on fusion rates in patients undergoing a 1-level ACDF with allograft and a locked anterior cervical plate. Methods This study is composed of patients from the control groups of 5 separate studies evaluating the use of an anterior cervical disc replacement to treat cervical radiculopathy. For each of the 5 studies the control group consisted of patients who underwent a 1-level ACDF with allograft and a locked cervical plate. The authors of the present study reviewed data obtained in a total of 573 patients; 156 patients were smokers and 417 were nonsmokers. A minimum follow-up period of 24 months was required for inclusion in this study. Fusion status was assessed by independent observers using lateral, neutral, and flexion/extension radiographs. Results An overall fusion rate of 91.4% was achieved in all 573 patients. A solid fusion was shown in 382 patients (91.6%) who were nonsmokers. Among patients who were smokers, 142 (91.0%) had radiographic evidence of a solid fusion. A 2-tailed Fisher exact test revealed a p value of 0.867, indicating no difference in the union rates between smokers and nonsmokers. Conclusions The authors found no statistically significant difference in fusion status between smokers and nonsmokers who underwent a single-level ACDF with allograft and a locked anterior cervical plate. Although the authors do not promote tobacco use, it appears that the use of allograft with a locked cervical plate in single-level ACDF among smokers produces similar fusion rates as it does in their nonsmoking counterparts.

scholarly journals Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion performed using structural allograft or polyetheretherketone: pseudarthrosis and revision surgery rates with minimum 2-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-569
Author(s):  
Minghao Wang ◽  
Dean Chou ◽  
Chih-Chang Chang ◽  
Ankit Hirpara ◽  
Yilin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Anterior Plate ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Posterior Surgery ◽  
Structural Allograft ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgery Rates

OBJECTIVEBoth structural allograft and PEEK have been used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There are reports that PEEK has a higher pseudarthrosis rate than structural allograft. The authors compared pseudarthrosis, revision, subsidence, and loss of lordosis rates in patients with PEEK and structural allograft.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of patients who were treated with ACDF at their hospital between 2005 and 2017. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with either PEEK or structural allograft, anterior plate fixation, and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were hybrid PEEK and allograft cases, additional posterior surgery, adjacent corpectomies, infection, tumor, stand-alone or integrated screw and cage devices, bone morphogenetic protein use, or lack of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic variables, number of treated levels, interbody type (PEEK cage vs structural allograft), graft packing material, pseudarthrosis rates, revision surgery rates, subsidence, and cervical lordosis changes were collected. These data were analyzed by Pearson’s chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact test, according to the sample size and expected value) and Student t-test.RESULTSA total of 168 patients (264 levels total, mean follow-up time 39.5 ± 24.0 months) were analyzed. Sixty-one patients had PEEK, and 107 patients had structural allograft. Pseudarthrosis rates for 1-level fusions were 5.4% (PEEK) and 3.4% (allograft) (p > 0.05); 2-level fusions were 7.1% (PEEK) and 8.1% (allograft) (p > 0.05); and ≥ 3-level fusions were 10% (PEEK) and 11.1% (allograft) (p > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the subsidence magnitude between PEEK and allograft in 1-, 2-, and ≥ 3-level ACDF (p > 0.05). Postoperative lordosis loss was not different between cohorts for 1- and 2-level surgeries.CONCLUSIONSIn 1- and 2-level ACDF with plating involving the same number of fusion levels, there was no statistically significant difference in the pseudarthrosis rate, revision surgery rate, subsidence, and lordosis loss between PEEK cages and structural allograft.

scholarly journals Safety of Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ketan Yerneni ◽  
John F Burke ◽  
Pranathi Chunduru ◽  
Annette M Molinaro ◽  
K Daniel Riew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level I ◽  
High Level

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is being increasingly offered on an outpatient basis. However, the safety profile of outpatient ACDF remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVE To review the medical literature on the safety of outpatient ACDF. METHODS We systematically reviewed the literature for articles published before April 1, 2018, describing outpatient ACDF and associated complications, including incidence of reoperation, stroke, thrombolytic events, dysphagia, hematoma, and mortality. A random-effects analysis was performed comparing complications between the inpatient and outpatient groups. RESULTS We identified 21 articles that satisfied the selection criteria, of which 15 were comparative studies. Most of the existing studies were retrospective, with a lack of level I or II studies on this topic. We found no statistically significant difference between inpatient and outpatient ACDF in overall complications, incidence of stroke, thrombolytic events, dysphagia, and hematoma development. However, patients undergoing outpatient ACDF had lower reported reoperation rates (P &lt; .001), mortality (P &lt; .001), and hospitalization duration (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis indicates that there is a lack of high level of evidence studies regarding the safety of outpatient ACDF. However, the existing literature suggests that outpatient ACDF can be safe, with low complication rates comparable to inpatient ACDF in well-selected patients. Patients with advanced age and comorbidities such as obesity and significant myelopathy are likely not suitable for outpatient ACDF. Spine surgeons must carefully evaluate each patient to decide whether outpatient ACDF is a safe option. Higher quality, large prospective randomized control trials are needed to accurately demonstrate the safety profile of outpatient ACDF.

scholarly journals Cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy in the treatment of symptomatic cervical spondylosis

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (37) ◽  
pp. e22145
Author(s):  
Yi Tong ◽  
Xufeng Jia ◽  
Yunlong Zhou ◽  
Daxiong Feng ◽  
Dechao Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylosis ◽  
Anterior Cervical Discectomy ◽  
Cervical Arthroplasty ◽  
Cervical Discectomy

Return-to-Work Interval and Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Results of a Prospective Series of 233 Patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 568-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. CHAISE ◽  
P. BELLEMÈRE ◽  
J. P. FRIL ◽  
E. GAISNE ◽  
P. POIRIER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Civil Servants ◽  
Workers Compensation ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Aim of the study To evaluate the connection between the type of patient insurance and the time taken to return to work after carpal tunnel surgery. Patients and methods Two hundred and thirty-three patients in full-time work were operated on for carpal tunnel syndrome between 1 January and 30 June 1998. They were divided into three groups: independent workers ( n=87), wage earners in the private sector ( n=90) and civil servants ( n=56). Four categories were defined: manual workers, non-manual workers, patients with social security insurance and patients with workers compensation. The average return-to-work interval after surgery for each of the groups was evaluated and compared group by group. Results For independent workers the average time off work is 17 days, for those in the private sector it is 35 days, and for civil servants it is 56 days. Patients with social security insurance were off work for 32 days and those with workers compensation for 49 days. Discussion The comparison shows significant differences with regard to social security insurance: the return-to-work interval in civil servants is larger than for private sector workers, and this is higher than in independent workers. The difference between patients with workers compensation and those with social security insurance is 17 days and significant. There is a significant difference between manual and non-manual workers in independent and private sector workers. There is no significant difference between the sub-groups in the civil servants. These cross references enable us to work out the influence that social security status has on the return-to-work time following surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document