Fgf-8 determines rostral-caudal polarity in the first branchial arch

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.S. Tucker ◽  
G. Yamada ◽  
M. Grigoriou ◽  
V. Pachnis ◽  
P.T. Sharpe
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Spatial Expression ◽  
Mandibular Arch ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Cell Competence ◽  
Mesenchyme Cells

In mammals, rostral ectomesenchyme cells of the mandibular arch give rise to odontogenic cells, while more caudal cells form the distal skeletal elements of the lower jaw. Signals from the epithelium are required for the development of odontogenic and skeletogenic mesenchyme cells. We show that rostral-caudal polarity is first established in mandibular branchial arch ectomesenchymal cells by a signal, Fgf-8, from the rostral epithelium. All neural crest-derived ectomesenchymal cells are equicompetent to respond to Fgf-8. The restriction into rostral (Lhx-7-expressing) and caudal (Gsc-expressing) domains is achieved by cells responding differently according to their proximity to the source of the signal. Once established, spatial expression domains and cell fates are fixed and maintained by Fgf-8 in conjunction with another epithelial signal, endothelin-1, and by positional changes in ectomesenchymal cell competence to respond to the signal.

sucker encodes a zebrafish Endothelin-1 required for ventral pharyngeal arch development

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (17) ◽  
pp. 3815-3828 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.T. Miller ◽  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
K. Lee ◽  
J. Parker ◽  
C.B. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Dorsoventral Patterning ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Arch Neural

Mutation of sucker (suc) disrupts development of the lower jaw and other ventral cartilages in pharyngeal segments of the zebrafish head. Our sequencing, cosegregation and rescue results indicate that suc encodes an Endothelin-1 (Et-1). Like mouse and chick Et-1, suc/et-1 is expressed in a central core of arch paraxial mesoderm and in arch epithelia, both surface ectoderm and pharyngeal endoderm, but not in skeletogenic neural crest. Long before chondrogenesis, suc/et-1 mutant embryos have severe defects in ventral arch neural crest expression of dHAND, dlx2, msxE, gsc, dlx3 and EphA3 in the anterior arches. Dorsal expression patterns are unaffected. Later in development, suc/et-1 mutant embryos display defects in mesodermal and endodermal tissues of the pharynx. Ventral premyogenic condensations fail to express myoD, which correlates with a ventral muscle defect. Further, expression of shh in endoderm of the first pharyngeal pouch fails to extend as far laterally as in wild types. We use mosaic analyses to show that suc/et-1 functions nonautonomously in neural crest cells, and is thus required in the environment of postmigratory neural crest cells to specify ventral arch fates. Our mosaic analyses further show that suc/et-1 nonautonomously functions in mesendoderm for ventral arch muscle formation. Collectively our results support a model for dorsoventral patterning of the gnathostome pharyngeal arches in which Et-1 in the environment of the postmigratory cranial neural crest specifies the lower jaw and other ventral arch fates.

A signaling cascade involving endothelin-1, dHAND and msx1 regulates development of neural-crest-derived branchial arch mesenchyme

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (16) ◽  
pp. 3005-3014 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Thomas ◽  
H. Kurihara ◽  
H. Yamagishi ◽  
Y. Kurihara ◽  
Y. Yazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Abnormal Development ◽  
Cardiac Defects ◽  
Endothelin 1 ◽  
The Third ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Catch 22

Numerous human syndromes are the result of abnormal cranial neural crest development. One group of such defects, referred to as CATCH-22 (cardiac defects, abnormal facies, thymic hypoplasia, cleft palate, hypocalcemia, associated with chromosome 22 microdeletion) syndrome, exhibit craniofacial and cardiac defects resulting from abnormal development of the third and fourth neural crest-derived branchial arches and branchial arch arteries. Mice harboring a null mutation of the endothelin-1 gene (Edn1), which is expressed in the epithelial layer of the branchial arches and encodes for the endothelin-1 (ET-1) signaling peptide, have a phenotype similar to CATCH-22 syndrome with aortic arch defects and craniofacial abnormalities. Here we show that the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, dHAND, is expressed in the mesenchyme underlying the branchial arch epithelium. Further, dHAND and the related gene, eHAND, are downregulated in the branchial and aortic arches of Edn1-null embryos. In mice homozygous null for the dHAND gene, the first and second arches are hypoplastic secondary to programmed cell death and the third and fourth arches fail to form. Molecular analysis revealed that most markers of the neural-crest-derived components of the branchial arch are expressed in dHAND-null embryos, suggesting normal migration of neural crest cells. However, expression of the homeobox gene, Msx1, was undetectable in the mesenchyme of dHAND-null branchial arches but unaffected in the limb bud, consistent with the separable regulatory elements of Msx1 previously described. Together, these data suggest a model in which epithelial secretion of ET-1 stimulates mesenchymal expression of dHAND, which regulates Msx1 expression in the growing, distal branchial arch. Complete disruption of this molecular pathway results in growth failure of the branchial arches from apoptosis, while partial disruption leads to defects of branchial arch derivatives, similar to those seen in CATCH-22 syndrome.

Temporospatial cell interactions regulating mandibular and maxillary arch patterning

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.A. Ferguson ◽  
A.S. Tucker ◽  
P.T. Sharpe
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Oral Epithelium ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Mandibular Arch ◽  
Cellular Origin ◽  
Cell Gene Expression ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Maxillary Arch

The cellular origin of the instructive information for hard tissue patterning of the jaws has been the subject of a long-standing controversy. Are the cranial neural crest cells prepatterned or does the epithelium pattern a developmentally uncommitted population of ectomesenchymal cells? In order to understand more about how orofacial patterning is controlled we have investigated the temporal signalling interactions and responses between epithelium and mesenchymal cells in the mandibular and maxillary primordia. We show that within the mandibular arch, homeobox genes that are expressed in different proximodistal spatial domains corresponding to presumptive molar and incisor ectomesenchymal cells are induced by signals from the oral epithelium. In mouse, prior to E10, all ectomesenchyme cells in the mandibular arch are equally responsive to epithelial signals such as Fgf8, indicating that there is no pre-specification of these cells into different populations and suggesting that patterning of the hard tissues of the mandible is instructed by the epithelium. By E10.5, ectomesenchymal cell gene expression domains are still dependent on epithelial signals but have become fixed and ectopic expression cannot be induced. At E11 expression becomes independent of epithelial signals such that removal of the epithelium does not affect spatial ectomesenchymal expression. Significantly, however, the response of ectomesenchyme cells to epithelial regulatory signals was found to be different in the mandibular and maxillary primordium. Thus, whereas both mandibular and maxillary arch epithelia could induce Dlx2 and Dlx5 expression in the mandible and Dlx2 expression in the maxilla, neither could induce Dlx5 expression in the maxilla. Reciprocal cell transplantations between mandibular and maxillary arch ectomesenchymal cells revealed intrinsic differences between these populations of cranial neural crest-derived cells. Research in odontogenesis has shown that the oral epithelium of the mandibular and maxillary primordia has unique instructive signaling properties required to direct odontogenesis, which are not found in other branchial arch epithelia. As a consequence, development of jaw-specific skeletal structures may require some prespecification of maxillary ectomesenchyme to restrict the instructive influence of the epithelial signals and allow development of maxillary structures distinct from mandibular structures.

Spatial organization of the epithelium and the role of neural crest cells in the initiation of the mammalian tooth germ

Development ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 103 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. S. Lumsden
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Developmental Stages ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Oral Epithelium ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Mandibular Arch

Teeth develop from composite organ rudiments that are formed through the interaction of oral epithelium and mesenchyme of the first branchial arch; cells of the former differentiate into enamel-secreting ameloblasts whereas those of the latter differentiate into dentine-secreting odontoblasts. Experimental analysis of odontogenic tissue interactions in mammalian embryos has focused on the late developmental stages of morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation; little is known about initial pattern-forming events, during which presumptive tooth-forming cells are specified and the sites of tooth initiation become established. It requires to be shown, for example, whether the mesenchymal cells of mammalian teeth are derived, like those of amphibians, from the cranial neural crest, and if so, whether these form a specified subpopulation in the neural folds. Alternatively, are they specified after migration into the mandibular arch, possibly by interaction with the oral epithelium? The developmental potentials of mouse embryo premigratory cranial neural crest cells (CNC – explanted from the caudal mesencephalic and rostral metencephalic neural folds) have been studied in intraocular homograft recombinations with various regions of embryonic surface ectoderm. Cartilage, bone and neural tissue developed in all combinations of CNC and epithelium. Teeth formed in combinations of CNC with mandibular arch epithelium but not in combinations of CNC with limb bud epithelium. Teeth also formed in combinations of mandibular arch epithelium with neural crest explanted from the trunk level. These results indicate that mammalian neural crest has an odontogenic potential but that this is not restricted to the crest of presumptive tooth-forming levels. Normal migration appears not to be a prerequisite for expression of odontogenic potential but this does require an interaction with region-specific epithelium. It is reasonable to infer that during normal development the neural crest that enters the mandibular arch is odontogenically unspecified before or during migration and that the oral epithelium is the earliest known site of tooth pattern.

scholarly journals Rhombencephalic neural crest segmentation is preserved throughout craniofacial ontogeny

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
pp. 3229-3242 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Kontges ◽  
A. Lumsden
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Proximal Region ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Connective Tissues ◽  
Mandibular Arch ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Evolutionary Changes

To investigate the influence of hindbrain segmentation on craniofacial patterning we have studied the long term fate of neural crest (NC) subpopulations of individual rhombomeres (r), using quail-chick chimeras. Mapping of all skeletal and muscle connective tissues developing from these small regions revealed several novel features of the cranial neural crest. First, the mandibular arch skeleton has a composite origin in which the proximal elements are r1+r2 derived, whereas more distal ones are exclusively midbrain derived. The most proximal region of the lower jaw is derived from second arch (r4) NC. Second, both the lower jaw and tongue skeleton display an organisation which precisely reflects the rostrocaudal order of segmental crest deployment from the embryonic hindbrain. Third, cryptic intraskeletal boundaries, which do not correspond to anatomical landmarks, form sharply defined interfaces between r1+r2, r4 and r6+r7 crest. Cells that survive the early apoptotic elimination of premigratory NC in r3 and r5 are restricted to tiny contributions within the 2nd arch (r4) skeleton. Fourth, a highly constrained pattern of cranial skeletomuscular connectivity was found that precisely respects the positional origin of its constitutive crest: each rhombomeric population remains coherent throughout ontogeny, forming both the connective tissues of specific muscles and their respective attachment sites onto the neuro- and viscerocranium. Finally, focal clusters of crest cells, confined to the attachment sites of branchial muscles, intrude into the otherwise mesodermal cranial base. In the viscerocranium, an equally strict, rhombomere-specific matching of muscle connective tissues and their attachment sites is found for all branchial and tongue (hypoglossal) muscles. This coherence of segmental crest populations explains how cranial skeletomuscular pattern can be implemented and conserved despite evolutionary changes in the shapes of skeletal elements.

scholarly journals Hedgehog signaling patterns the oral-aboral axis of the mandibular arch

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyue Xu ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
Yu Lan ◽  
Mike Adam ◽  
David E Clouthier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Hedgehog Signaling ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Bmp Signaling ◽  
Mandibular Arch ◽  
Complementary Pattern ◽  
Mesenchyme Cells

Development of vertebrate jaws involves patterning neural crest-derived mesenchyme cells into distinct subpopulations along the proximal-distal and oral-aboral axes. Although the molecular mechanisms patterning the proximal-distal axis have been well studied, little is known regarding the mechanisms patterning the oral-aboral axis. Using unbiased single-cell RNA-seq analysis followed by in situ analysis of gene expression profiles, we show that Shh and Bmp4 signaling pathways are activated in a complementary pattern along the oral-aboral axis in mouse embryonic mandibular arch. Tissue-specific inactivation of hedgehog signaling in neural crest-derived mandibular mesenchyme led to expansion of BMP signaling activity to throughout the oral-aboral axis of the distal mandibular arch and subsequently duplication of dentary bone in the oral side of the mandible at the expense of tongue formation. Further studies indicate that hedgehog signaling acts through the Foxf1/2 transcription factors to specify the oral fate and pattern the oral-aboral axis of the mandibular mesenchyme.

Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish I: branchial arches

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
T. Piotrowski ◽  
H. Grandel ◽  
M. Brand ◽  
C.P. Heisenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Zebrafish Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Pigment Cells ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Pectoral Fins ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Group Members ◽  
The Brain

Jaws and branchial arches together are a basic, segmented feature of the vertebrate head. Seven arches develop in the zebrafish embryo (Danio rerio), derived largely from neural crest cells that form the cartilaginous skeleton. In this and the following paper we describe the phenotypes of 109 arch mutants, focusing here on three classes that affect the posterior pharyngeal arches, including the hyoid and five gill-bearing arches. In lockjaw, the hyoid arch is strongly reduced and subsets of branchial arches do not develop. Mutants of a large second class, designated the flathead group, lack several adjacent branchial arches and their associated cartilages. Five alleles at the flathead locus all lead to larvae that lack arches 4–6. Among 34 other flathead group members complementation tests are incomplete, but at least six unique phenotypes can be distinguished. These all delete continuous stretches of adjacent branchial arches and unpaired cartilages in the ventral midline. Many show cell death in the midbrain, from which some neural crest precursors of the arches originate. lockjaw and a few mutants in the flathead group, including pistachio, affect both jaw cartilage and pigmentation, reflecting essential functions of these genes in at least two neural crest lineages. Mutants of a third class, including boxer, dackel and pincher, affect pectoral fins and axonal trajectories in the brain, as well as the arches. Their skeletal phenotypes suggest that they disrupt cartilage morphogenesis in all arches. Our results suggest that there are sets of genes that: (1) specify neural crest cells in groups of adjacent head segments, and (2) function in common genetic pathways in a variety of tissues including the brain, pectoral fins and pigment cells as well as pharyngeal arches.

scholarly journals Endothelin-1 regulates the dorsoventral branchial arch patterning in mice

2004 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidenori Ozeki ◽  
Yukiko Kurihara ◽  
Kazuo Tonami ◽  
Sanae Watatani ◽  
Hiroki Kurihara
Keyword(s):  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Endothelin 1
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document