ASO Author Reflections: Completion Axillary Dissection Can Be Avoided but Inconsistent Trial Design Complicates Choosing Between Alternative Strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2677-2678
Author(s):  
Matthew Castelo ◽  
Adena S. Scheer
2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 3801-3809 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. van Bekkum ◽  
A. C. Kraima ◽  
P. J. Westenend ◽  
P. W. Plaisier ◽  
M. B. E. Menke-Pluijmers

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 669-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Glasgow ◽  
Nikhil Satchidanand ◽  
Gopal Chandru Kowdley

The rate of micrometastatic disease (MMD) to nonsentinel lymph nodes (NSLNs) has been shown to vary considerably in the literature. We identified patients with breast cancer with MMD (N1mi) and measured the incidence of NSLN involvement. We then compared these patients with those who had no metastasis to the SLN (N0) and those who had macrometastasis to the SLN (N2) in an attempt to better understand the behavior of patients with N1mi positivity. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 574 patients with invasive breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2007. Patients were stratified into three groups: no metastasis (N0), MMD (N1mi), and macrometastasis (N2). Chi square analysis and logistic regression models using SPSS software were applied to determine significance between groups. MMD rate was 7.7 per cent (44 of 574). Of this subset of patients, 33 underwent completion axillary dissection, and only two were found to have NSLN-positive disease. Statistical significance was achieved for NSLN positivity when comparing all three nodal groups against one another (χ22,572 = 337.084, P = 0.000). Logistic regression showed multifocality and lymphovascular invasion to be significant predictors of NSLN metastasis. NSLN positivity in patients with MMD acts similarly to node-positive disease and therefore cannot completely exclude axillary dissection from therapeutic algorithm.


2004 ◽  
Vol 239 (6) ◽  
pp. 859-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Fournier ◽  
Anne Schiller ◽  
Roger R. Perry ◽  
Christine Laronga

Cancer ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa F. Hwang ◽  
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
Min Yi ◽  
Thomas A. Buchholz ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter P. Weber ◽  
Mitchel Barry ◽  
Michelle M. Stempel ◽  
Manuela J. Junqueira ◽  
Anne A. Eaton ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
B. E. Byrne ◽  
R. I. Cutress ◽  
J. Gill ◽  
M. H. Wise ◽  
C. Yiangou ◽  
...  

Introduction. Patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy may undergo delayed completion axillary dissection. Where intraoperative analysis is available, immediate completion axillary dissection can be performed. Alternatively, patients may undergo primary axillary dissection for breast cancer, historically or when preoperative assessment suggests axillary metastases. This study aims to determine if there is a difference in the total number of lymph nodes or the number of metastatic nodes harvested between the 3 possible approaches.Methods. Three consecutive comparable groups of 50 consecutive patients who underwent axillary dissection in each of the above contexts were identified from the Portsmouth Breast Unit Database. Patient demographics, clinicopathological variables, and surgical treatment were recorded. The total pathological nodal count and the number of metastatic nodes were compared between the groups.Results. There were no differences in clinico-pathological features between the three groups for all features studied with the exception of breast surgical procedure (P<0.001). There were no differences in total nodal harvest (P=0.822) or in the number of positive nodes harvested (P=0.157) between the three groups.Conclusion. The three approaches to axillary clearance yield equivalent nodal harvests, suggesting oncological equivalence and robustness of surgical technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document