scholarly journals Prediction of the Oral Pharmacokinetics and Food Effects of Gabapentin Enacarbil Extended-Release Tablets Using Biorelevant Dissolution Tests

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 1708-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satomi Yamaguchi Ikeuchi ◽  
Atsushi Kambayashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Kojima ◽  
Naoto Oku ◽  
Tomohiro Asai
2016 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 193-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cord J. Andreas ◽  
Irena Tomaszewska ◽  
Uwe Muenster ◽  
Dorina van der Mey ◽  
Wolfgang Mueck ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3461-3477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domagoj Segregur ◽  
Talia Flanagan ◽  
James Mann ◽  
Andrea Moir ◽  
Eva M. Karlsson ◽  
...  

ADMET & DMPK ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Gruberová ◽  
Bohumil Kratochvil

<p class="ADMETabstracttext">The choice of an appropriate medium for dissolution tests is an essential step during a dosage form development. The adequate design of dissolution testing enables forecasting in vivo behavior of drug formulation. Biorelevant media were developed for this purpose because dissolution media described in the International Pharmacopoeia are not thoroughly suitable. Therefore, we carried out solubility and dissolution tests in biorelevant media and we compared the results with data measured in compendial dissolution media. A shake-flask method and standard paddle apparatus were used. The concentration was measured by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. An oral solid dosage form with poorly soluble drug candesartan cilexetil was tested. Significant differences in the solubility and dissolution profiles of candesartan cilexetil were observed. The study offers the overview of compendial and biorelevant media simulating fasted state that can be analyzed by a spectrophotometric technique.</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 128-130
Author(s):  
Amy B. Werremeyer

Gabapentin enacarbil was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April of 2011. This article reviews clinically significant aspects of this new drug including: the FDA-approved indications, mechanism of action, administration, drug interactions, adverse effects, clinical trial evidence, innovative properties and place in therapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 846-858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin Johnson ◽  
Sabrina Ciric ◽  
Sophie Boudriau ◽  
Dennis Swearingen ◽  
Joseph Stauffer

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1s) ◽  
pp. 19s-31s ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Amaral Silva ◽  
Raimar Löbenberg ◽  
Neal Davies

PURPOSE: The U.S. Pharmacopeia defines excipients as substances other than the active pharmaceutic ingredient (API) that are added in a drug delivery system in order to aid in the manufacturing process and enhance stability, bioavailability, safety, effectiveness and delivery of the drug. The 1968 phenytoin intoxication outbreak in Brisbane, Australia, is a classic example of an API–excipient interaction. When administered with CaSO4 the absorption of phenytoin was reduced due to an interaction between the API and the excipient. When CaSO4 was replaced by lactose, the amount of drug absorbed was much higher, resulting in the observed intoxication. It was hypothesized that phenytoin was converted to a calcium salt prior to ingestion. The purpose of this study was to mechanistically investigate the interactions between excipients and phenytoin to confirm the hypothesis of the previous reports. METHODS: Titration experiments with phenytoin and calcium salt were performed. Isothermal micro calorimetry was used to determine incompatibilities between excipients, phenytoin and milk. NMR was used to characterize the compounds. Dissolution tests containing CaSO4, lactose or sorbitol as excipients were also performed. Both Canadian and United States of America commercially available capsules were tested with milk and water. RESULTS: The calorimeter results indicate that phenytoin sodium interacts with CaSO4 in aqueous media and the dissolution profile of CaSO4 containing capsules showed a reduced dissolution rate. In addition, phenytoin sodium also interacts with lactose through a Maillard reaction that can occur at body temperature. Likewise, commercial Phenytoin sodium products interacted with milk and the products containing lactose showed browning in water. CONCLUSION: In Canada and the USA, the reference product contains lactose as an excipient in the formulation, whereas the Canadian generic formulations do not contain lactose. Any clinical relevance of these difference has not been determined. A new incompatibility between phenytoin and lactose has been discovered and an incompatibility with calcium was confirmed, which may have implications in regard to excipients and food effects. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see “For Readers”) may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue’s contents page.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document