scholarly journals Change In VO2max And Time Trial Performance To Interval Training Prescribed According To Ventilatory Threshold

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (5S) ◽  
pp. 264-265
Author(s):  
Todd A. Astorino ◽  
Jamie DeRevere ◽  
Theodore Anderson ◽  
Patrick Holstrom ◽  
Erin Kellogg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventilatory Threshold ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Time Trial Performance ◽  
Trial Performance

scholarly journals Influence of Interval Training Frequency on Time-Trial Performance in Elite Endurance Athletes

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 3190
Author(s):  
Espen Tønnessen ◽  
Jonny Hisdal ◽  
Bent R. Ronnestad
Keyword(s):  
Time Trial ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Endurance Athletes ◽  
Training Volume ◽  
Time Trial Performance ◽  
Performance Improvements ◽  
Frequency Group ◽  
Training Frequency ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Trial Performance

Purpose: To determine the impact of interval training frequency in elite endurance athletes. It was hypothesized that two longer sessions would elicit greater performance improvements and physiological adaptation than four shorter sessions at the same intensity. Methods: Elite cross-country skiers and biathletes were randomly assigned to either a high-frequency group (HF group) (5 M, 1 F, age 22 (19–26), VO2max 67.8 (65.5–70.2) mL/kg/min) doing four short interval sessions per week or a low-frequency group (LF group) (8 M, 1 F, age 22 (18–23), VO2max 70.7 (67.0–73.9) mL/kg/min) doing two longer interval sessions. All interval sessions were performed at ~85% of maximum heart rate, and groups were matched for total weekly training volume. Pre- and post-intervention, athletes completed an 8 km rollerski time-trial, maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) test, and an incremental, submaximal exercise test. Results: The LF group had a statistically significant improved time-trial performance following the intervention (p = 0.04), with no statistically significant changes in the HF group. Similarly, percentage utilization of VO2max at anaerobic threshold (p = 0.04) and exercise economy (p = 0.01) were statistically significantly improved following the intervention in the LF group only. No statistically significant changes in VO2max were observed in either group. Conclusions: Two longer interval sessions appear superior to four shorter sessions per week in promoting endurance adaptations and performance improvements in elite endurance athletes. Despite matched training volume and exercise intensity, the larger, more concentrated exercise stimulus in the LF group appears to induce more favorable adaptations. The longer time between training sessions in the LF group may also have allowed athletes to recover more effectively and better “absorb” the training. These findings are in line with the “best practice” observed by many of the world’s best endurance athletes.

Effects of Different Uphill Interval-Training Programs on Running Economy and Performance

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Barnes ◽  
Will G. Hopkins ◽  
Michael R. McGuigan ◽  
Andrew E. Kilding
Keyword(s):  
Training Programs ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Quadratic Function ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Running Economy ◽  
Confidence Limits ◽  
Time Trial Performance ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Trial Performance

Purpose:Runners use uphill running as a movement-specific form of resistance training to enhance performance. However, the optimal parameters for prescribing intervals are unknown. The authors adopted a dose-response design to investigate the effects of various uphill interval-training programs on physiological and performance measures.Methods:Twenty well-trained runners performed an incremental treadmill test to determine aerobic and biomechanical measures, a series of jumps on a force plate to determine neuromuscular measures, and a 5-km time trial. Runners were then randomly assigned to 1 of 5 uphill interval-training programs. After 6 wk all tests were repeated. To identify the optimal training program for each measure, each runner’s percentage change was modeled as a quadratic function of the rank order of the intensity of training. Uncertainty in the optimal training and in the corresponding effect on the given measure was estimated as 90% confidence limits using bootstrapping.Results:There was no clear optimum for time-trial performance, and the mean improvement over all intensities was 2.0% (confidence limits ±0.6%). The highest intensity was clearly optimal for running economy (improvement of 2.4% ± 1.4%) and for all neuromuscular measures, whereas other aerobic measures were optimal near the middle intensity. There were no consistent optima for biomechanical measures.Conclusions:These findings support anecdotal reports for incorporating uphill interval training in the training programs of distance runners to improve physiological parameters relevant to running performance. Until more data are obtained, runners can assume that any form of high-intensity uphill interval training will benefit 5-km time-trial performance.

scholarly journals Roller-Ski Aerobic High-Intensity Interval Training Improves the VO2max and Anaerobic Power in Cross-Country Skiers

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-33
Author(s):  
BAHAR ATEŞ ◽  
Ebru ÇETİN
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Anaerobic Power ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Time Trial Performance ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Cross Country ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Trial Performance

The purpose of this study was to investigate the 8-week of roller-ski aerobic high-intensity interval training on aerobic and anaerobic power in cross-country skiers. 10 male [age, 18,28±2,1 years; height, 171,26±4,12 cm; weight, 61,39±6,28 kg] and 8 female [age, 16,05±0.3 years; height, 158,3±6,47 cm; weight, 49,34±0.7 kg]  junior cross-country skiers completed the study. All skiers performed 2x2-km all-out uphill intervals with roller-skis, 3 times a week, in addition to their traditional training program. Measurements included VO2max, anaerobic power, and also for 2-km time-trial performance. All values were listed as pre-to post-test mean [±SD], significant level, and percentage changes [%]. Pre-to post-testing changes in VO2max, anaerobic power, and also 2-km time-trial performance were significantly higher during all post-test trials in all groups [p<0.005]. As a result, we suggest that the skiers should integrate the roller-ski aerobic high-intensity interval uphill models in their training programs for improving performance.

scholarly journals A flow resistive inspiratory muscle training mask worn during high-intensity interval training does not improve 5 km running time-trial performance

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Faghy ◽  
Peter I. Brown ◽  
Nicola M. Davis ◽  
J. P. Mayes ◽  
Tom M. Maden-Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Inspiratory Muscle ◽  
Inspiratory Muscle Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Muscle Training ◽  
Time Trial Performance ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Trial Performance

Abstract Purpose There is little evidence of the ergogenic effect of flow-resistive masks worn during exercise. We compared a flow-resistive face mask (MASK) worn during high-intensity interval training (HIIT) against pressure threshold loading inspiratory muscle training (IMT). Methods 23 participants (13 males) completed a 5 km time trial and six weeks of HIIT (3 sessions weekly). HIIT (n = 8) consisted of repeated work (2 min) at the speed equivalent to 95% $${\dot{\text{V}}}$$ V ˙ O2 peak with equal rest. Repetitions were incremental (six in weeks 1, 2 and 6, eight in weeks 3 and 4 and ten in week 5). Participants were allocated to one of three training groups. MASK (n = 8) wore a flow-resistive mask during all sessions. The IMT group (n = 8) completed 2 × 30 breaths daily at 50% maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax). A control group (CON, n = 7) completed HIIT only. Following HIIT, participants completed two 5 km time trials, the first matched identically to pre-intervention trial (ISO time), and a self-paced effort. Results Time trial performance was improved in all groups (MASK 3.1 ± 1.7%, IMT, 5.7 ± 1.5% and CON 2.6 ± 1.0%, p < 0.05). IMT improved greater than MASK and CON (p = 0.004). Post intervention, PImax and diaphragm thickness were improved in IMT only (32% and 9.5%, respectively, p = 0.003 and 0.024). Conclusion A flow-resistive mask worn during HIIT provides no benefit to 5 km performance when compared to HIIT only. Supplementing HIIT with IMT improves respiratory muscle strength, morphology and performance greater than HIIT alone.

Effects of different interval-training programs on cycling time-trial performance

1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 736-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
NIGEL K. STEPTO ◽  
JOHN A. HAWLEY ◽  
STEVEN C. DENNIS ◽  
WILL G. HOPKINS
Keyword(s):  
Training Programs ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Time Trial Performance ◽  
Cycling Time Trial ◽  
Cycling Time ◽  
Trial Performance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document