scholarly journals How Demanding Is the Revealed Preference Approach to Demand?

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 2782-2795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy K. M Beatty ◽  
Ian A Crawford

A well-known problem with revealed preference methods is that when data are found to satisfy their restrictions it is hard to know whether this should be viewed as a triumph for economic theory, or a warning that these conditions are so undemanding that almost anything goes. This paper allows researchers to make this distinction. Our approach uses an axiomatic characterization of a measure of predictive success due to Selten (1991). We illustrate the idea using a panel dataset. The results show that this approach can lead us to radically reassess our view of the empirical performance of economic theory. JEL: D11, D12

Author(s):  
Jan Sprenger ◽  
Stephan Hartmann

According to Popper and other influential philosophers and scientists, scientific knowledge grows by repeatedly testing our best hypotheses. However, the interpretation of non-significant results—those that do not lead to a “rejection” of the tested hypothesis—poses a major philosophical challenge. To what extent do they corroborate the tested hypothesis or provide a reason to accept it? In this chapter, we prove two impossibility results for measures of corroboration that follow Popper’s criterion of measuring both predictive success and the testability of a hypothesis. Then we provide an axiomatic characterization of a more promising and scientifically useful concept of corroboration and discuss implications for the practice of hypothesis testing and the concept of statistical significance.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-491
Author(s):  
Waldemar Korczynski

In this paper an algebraic characterization of a class of Petri nets is given. The nets are characterized by a kind of algebras, which can be considered as a generalization of the concept of the case graph of a (marked) Petri net.


2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 1449-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Montiel Olea ◽  
Tomasz Strzalecki

Abstract This article provides an axiomatic characterization of quasi-hyperbolic discounting and a more general class of semi-hyperbolic preferences. We impose consistency restrictions directly on the intertemporal trade-offs by relying on what we call “annuity compensations.” Our axiomatization leads naturally to an experimental design that disentangles discounting from the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. In a pilot experiment we use the partial identification approach to estimate bounds for the distributions of discount factors in the subject pool. Consistent with previous studies, we find evidence for both present and future bias.


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1172-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Martyn Mulder ◽  
Ladislav Nebeský

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document