Impact of a telemedicine system on acute stroke care in a community hospital

Background: The Brant Community Healthcare System (BCHS) has consistently been well above the recommended 30 minute benchmark for door-to-needle (DTN) for eligible acute stroke patients. As a large community hospital with no neurologists, and like many other hospitals internationally, we rely on telestroke support for every stroke case. This is a time-consuming process that requires a multitude of phone calls, and pulls physicians from other acutely ill patients. We sought to develop a system that would streamline our approach and care for hyperacute stroke patients by targeting improvements in DTN. Aim Statement: We will decrease the door-to-needle (DTN) time for stroke patients arriving at the BCHS Emergency Department (ED) who are eligible for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) by 25% from a median of 87 minutes to 50 minutes by March 31, 2018 and maintain that standard. Measures & Design: Outcome Measures: Door-to-needle time for acute stroke patients receiving tPA Process Measures: Door-to-triage time, Door-to-CT time, Door-to-CTA time; INR collection-to-verification time, telestroke callback time Balancing Measures: Number of stroke protocol patients per month Model Design: We simultaneously designed and implemented a robust program to train physician assistants in hyperacute stroke care. Evaluation/Results: Through vast stakeholder engagement and implementing a multitude of change ideas, by March of 2018 we had achieved an average DTN of 53 minutes. Our door-to-triage time went from an average of 7 minutes to 3 minutes. Our door-to-CT time decreased from 17 minutes to 7 minutes and our time between CT and CTA from an average of 13 minutes to 3 minutes. One and a half years later, our average DTN is maintained at 55 minutes and physician assistants continue to effectively lead and liaise with telestroke neurologists and stroke patients. Discussion/Impact: Prior to this program, acute stroke care was a very contentious topic at our local community hospital. Creating a program that streamlined the care and standardized the work has proven successful, and not only allowed for improved DTN times but also freed up physicians to better simultaneously care for other acutely ill patients.

Download Full-text

Berlin PRehospital Or Usual Delivery of Acute Stroke Care 2.0 (B_PROUD 2.0)

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct03931616 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Essential Acute Stroke Care in Low Resource Settings: a Pilot studY

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct04157231 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Pilot Study ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Low Resource Settings ◽

Low Resource

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Provision of acute stroke care and associated factors in a multiethnic population: prospective study with the South London Stroke Register.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.8785964.9312066 ◽

2011 ◽

Author(s):

Erik Buskens

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Associated Factors ◽

Stroke Care ◽

The South ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Multiethnic Population ◽

Stroke Register

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000514140 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽

Andrés García-Pastor ◽

Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽

Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽

Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Time Course ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Group Data ◽

Radiological Data ◽

History Of ◽

Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the COVID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Download Full-text

Remote Longitudinal Inpatient Acute Stroke Care Via Telestroke

Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105749 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 30 (6) ◽

pp. 105749

Author(s):

Fatemeh Sobhani ◽

Shashvat Desai ◽

Evan Madill ◽

Matthew Starr ◽

Marcelo Rocha ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

Effect of Acute Stroke Care Regionalization on Intravenous Alteplase Use in Two Urban Counties

Prehospital Emergency Care ◽

10.1080/10903127.2019.1679303 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 24 (4) ◽

pp. 505-514 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Prasanthi Govindarajan ◽

Stephen Shiboski ◽

Barbara Grimes ◽

Lawrence J. Cook ◽

David Ghilarducci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Intravenous Alteplase

Download Full-text

Disabling stroke in persons already with a disability

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.0000000000008964 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 94 (7) ◽

pp. 306-310 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Michael J. Young ◽

Robert W. Regenhardt ◽

Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi ◽

Michael Ashley Stein

Keyword(s):

Clinical Practice ◽

Health Outcomes ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Clinical Practices ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Persons With Disabilities ◽

Stroke Research ◽

Scant Attention

Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and a leading cause of adult disability worldwide. More than a third of individuals presenting with strokes are estimated to have a preexisting disability. Despite unprecedented advances in stroke research and clinical practice over the past decade, approaches to acute stroke care for persons with preexisting disability have received scant attention. Current standards of research and clinical practice are influenced by an underexplored range of biases that may hinder acute stroke care for persons with disability. These trends may exacerbate unequal health outcomes by rendering novel stroke therapies inaccessible to many persons with disabilities. Here, we explore the underpinnings and implications of biases involving persons with disability in stroke research and practice. Recent insights from bioethics, disability rights, and health law are explained and critically evaluated in the context of prevailing research and clinical practices. Allowing disability to drive decisions to withhold acute stroke interventions may perpetuate disparate health outcomes and undermine ethically resilient stroke care. Advocacy for inclusion of persons with disability in future stroke trials can improve equity in stroke care delivery.

Download Full-text