scholarly journals Aortic intramural hematoma and classic aortic dissection: two sides of the same coin within the acute aortic syndrome for an interventional radiologist

2021 ◽  
pp. 20210019
Author(s):  
Pietro Pitrone ◽  
Antonino Cattafi ◽  
Giampiero Mastroeni ◽  
Francesco Patanè ◽  
Fabrizio Ceresa ◽  
...  

management of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (AIH) still represents a challenging issue. Although most resolve spontaneously or with conservative therapy, several cases of AIH may complicate into classic aortic dissection with subsequent risk of aortic rupture and visceral malperfusion, thus needing urgent or preemptive thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). Despite the long-term aorta-related survival, TEVAR might lead to graft obstruction, migration, infection, stroke/paraplegia, visceral ischemia, endoleak and, last but not least, retrograde aortic dissection (AD), frequent in the acute phase and associated with a high mortality risk. In order to highlight such a close relationship between AIH and AD and the possibility to perform endovascular treatment, we report the experience of an adult female patient with an aortic intramural hematoma evolving into a classic aortic dissection. Despite successful thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR), our patient developed an aortic dissection type A at one month with subsequent indication for cardiac surgery, still representing the elective approach in case of pathologies including the ascending aorta. Thus, the aim of our discussion is to create a debate on the most appropriate management for the treatment of descending AIH.

Aorta ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-209
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Petrilli ◽  
Giovanni Puppini ◽  
Daniele Calzaferri ◽  
Salvo Torre ◽  
Antonella Bugana ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaro Miyoshi ◽  
Shuichirou Kaji ◽  
Akiko Masumoto ◽  
Toshiaki Toyota ◽  
Taiji Okada ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (B-IMH) is a variant of acute aortic syndrome having similar clinical demographics to type B classic aortic dissection (B-AD), early clinical course including acute complications are not well investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate early clinical course and acute complications of B-IMH in comparison with that of B-AD. Methods: Clinical features and early clinical course including acute complications were retrospectively analyzed in 270 B-IMH and 177 B-AD consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital between 1991 and 2020. Acute complications were defined as rupture, impending rupture, re-dissection, and visceral and leg ischemia. Results: As compared with B-AD, B-IMH presented at older age (72±11 vs 62±15 years; p<0.001), predominantly in females (37% vs 25%). During in-hospital courses, limb ischemia and mesenteric ischemia were less common in patients with B-IMH than those with B-AD (0.4% versus 5.1%, p=0.003, 0.4% versus 2.8%, p=0.03; respectively). In contrast, spinal ischemia was more common in B-IMH patients (2.4% versus 0.6%, p=0.05). Aortic rupture and impending rupture were comparable between B-IMH and B-AD patients (5.9% versus 7.3%. p=0.28). Besides, re-dissection was also comparable between two groups (2.2% versus 5.1%, p=0.06). As a result, prevalence of acute complications was significantly lower in patients with B-IMH (8.8% versus 17%, p=0.008). In-hospital mortality rate in B-IMH was significantly lower than that in B-AD (0.4% versus 9.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Although patients with B-IMH had lower in-hospital mortality rates than patients with B-AD, significant portion of B-IMH patients had fatal complications including spinal ischemia or aortic rupture. Patients with B-IMH should be carefully observed as well as patients with B-AD patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Forcillo ◽  
Yazan M. Duwayri ◽  
William D. Jordan ◽  
Bradley G. Leshnower

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document