scholarly journals Primary effects of intravitreal bevacizumab inpatients with diabetic macular edema

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tareen Iftikhar -Ul-haq ◽  
Azizur Rahman ◽  
P.S Mahar ◽  
Muhammad Saleh Memon
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab

Current Therapy of Diabetic Macular Edema Bevacizumab, Triamcinolone Acetonide, and Laser Photocoagulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Gladys Kusumowidagdo ◽  
Randy Sarayar ◽  
Kartika Rahayu ◽  
Gitalisa Andayani
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽  
Mesh Terms

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Current gold standard therapy of DME is macular laser photocoagulation (MPC). Growing evidences have shown benefits of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents (i.e bevacizumab) and intravitreal corticosteroids (i.e triamcinolone acetonide). Aim: To compare the visual acuity (VA) improvement of patients with DME, treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), a combination of IVB and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVB/IVT), and MPC. Method: A comprehensive PubMed® and Cochrane® databases search was conducted on May 4th, 2017 using appropriate keywords (diabetic macular edema, bevacizumab, triamcinolone, and laser photocoagulation using their MeSH terms). Studies were filtered using inclusion criterions (clinical trials, RCT, meta-analysis, systematic review, English, humans, and publication within 10 years) Results: Three studies (2 systematic reviews and 1 RCT) were found suitable. From these results, all studies showed favoring effects of IVB when compared to IVB/IVT combination and MPC in short term period (up to 6 months). However, there was no significant improvement of VA beyond this period in all groups. Conclusion: IVB appears to be superior to IVB/IVT and MPC in improving VA during 6 months follow- up period. Future systematic reviews and meta-analysis are required on the effect of IVB and MPC combination in cases of DME.

Change in Visual Acuity in Relation to Central Macular Thickness after Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ali Haider ◽  
Uzma Sattar ◽  
Syeda Rushda Zaidi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Macular Thickness ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Central Macular Thickness ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Purpose: To evaluate the change in visual acuity in relation to decrease in central macular thickness,after a single dose of intravitreal Bevacizumab injection.Study Design: Quasi experimental study.Place and Duration of Study: Punjab Rangers Teaching Hospital, Lahore, from January 2019 to June 2019.Material and Methods: 70 eyes with diabetic macular edema were included in the study. Patients having high refractive errors (spherical equivalent of > ± 7.5D) and visual acuity worse than +1.2 or better than +0.2 on log MAR were excluded. Central macular edema was measured in μm on OCT and visual acuity was documentedusing Log MAR chart. These values were documented before and at 01 month after injection with intravitrealBevacizumab. Wilcoxon Signed rank test was used to evaluate the difference in VA beforeand after the anti-VEGF injection. Difference in visual acuity and macular edema (central) was observed,analyzed and represented in p value. P value was considered statistically significant if it was less than 0.01%.Results: Mean age of patients was 52.61 ± 1.3. Vision improved from 0.90 ± 0.02 to 0.84 ± 0.02 on log MARchart. The change was statistically significant with p value < 0.001. Central macular thickness reduced from 328 ±14 to 283 ± 10.6 μm on OCT after intravitreal anti-VEGF, with significant p value < 0.001.Conclusion: A 45 μm reduction in central macular thickness was associated with 0.1 Log MAR unit improvementin visual acuity after intravitreal Bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema.

EFFICACY OF 1.25 MG VERSUS 2.5 MG INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Retina ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
DENNIS S. C. LAM ◽  
TIMOTHY Y. Y. LAI ◽  
VINCENT Y. W. LEE ◽  
CARMEN K. M. CHAN ◽  
DAVID T. L. LIU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab

Intravitreal Bevacizumab versus Combined Bevacizumab-Triamcinolone versus Macular Laser Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 941-948 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Faghihi ◽  
R. Roohipoor ◽  
S.-F. Mohammadi ◽  
K. Hojat-Jalali ◽  
A. Mirshahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Laser Photocoagulation ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab

Correlation of response to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment between the first and second treated eyes in diabetic macular edema

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110596
Author(s):  
Nadav Levinger ◽  
Liran Tiosano ◽  
Elishai Assayag ◽  
Rivkah Lender ◽  
Tomer Batash ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Macular Edema ◽  
Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽  
Thickness Reduction ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment ◽  
Central Subfield Thickness ◽  
Bilateral Diabetic Macular Edema ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Selection Of

Purpose To evaluate whether outcome of bevacizumab treatment in the first treated eye can guide the selection of compound for the second treated eye in patients with bilateral diabetic macular edema. Methods Demographic, clinical, and optical coherence tomography data were retrospectively collected from consecutive patients who underwent bevacizumab therapy for bilateral diabetic macular edema. Change in central subfield thickness and visual acuity were evaluated and compared between the first treated eye and second treated eye. Results A total of 66 eyes of 33 patients were included in the study. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 13 ± 5 months. The mean ± SD central subfield thickness at baseline was 464 ± 30 μm in the first treated eye and 461 ± 29 μm in the second treated eye ( p = 0.91). Final central subfield thickness was reduced to 392 ± 27 μm in the first treated eye ( p = 0.01 compared with baseline) and 416 ± 25 μm in the second treated eye ( p = 0.03 compared with baseline). Using ≥5% or ≥10% reduction of central subfield thickness as diagnostic criteria to predict similar magnitude of thickness reduction in the first treated eye yielded a positive and negative predictive value ranging from 46% to 81%, and sensitivity and specificity ranging from 54% to 84%. Regression models did not show correlation between central subfield thickness reduction in first treated eye and the second treated eye at the end of follow-up. Conclusions Bevacizumab therapy reduced macular thickness in both eyes in bilateral diabetic macular edema. Treatment outcome of the first treated eye could not predict the outcome of the second treated eye. Particularly, failure to reduce central subfield thickness in the first treated eye does not preclude a favorable response to bevacizumab therapy in the second eye.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document