Intraoperative dexamethasone intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema patients undergoing phacoemulsification: The CataDex study

Purpose To assess the impact of preoperative intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DexI) on functional and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods Prospective and non-comparative study conducted on consecutive DME patients undergoing cataract surgery. DexI was administered 15 days before surgery and in a pro re nata regime after surgery. Main outcome measures were mean change in central retinal thickness (CRT), central subfield thickness (CST), total macular volume (TMV), and central subfield volume (CSV) from baseline to month-12. Secondary outcome was mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results Forty eyes were included in the study. CRT significantly decreased from 410.4 ± 64.8 µm at baseline to 303.2 ± 24.3 µm at month-12, p < 0.0001. Similarly, CST was significantly reduced from 436.4 ± 120.4 µm at baseline to 322.9 ± 54.2 µm at month-12, p < 0.0001. Total macular volume and CSV were significantly reduced from 9.95 ± 1.68 mm3 and 0.38 ± 0.11 mm3 at baseline to 8.49 ± 0.83 mm3 and 0.31 ± 0.05 mm3 at month-12, respectively ( p < 0.0001 each, respectively). BCVA significantly improved from 0.26 ± 0.17 Snellen equivalent at baseline to 0.65 ± 0.19 at month-12, p < 0.0001. Mean DexI administered during the study were 2.0 ± 0.3. Neither DME subtype nor previous treatment status had any effect on functional or anatomic outcomes. Regarding safety, one (2.5%) eye developed ocular hypertension, which was successfully controlled with topical hypotensive treatment. Conclusions DexI was and effective and safe strategy for managing DME in diabetic patients undergoing uneventful cataract surgery.

Intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of persistent post-surgical cystoid macular edema in vitrectomized eyes

Cystoid macular edema (CME) is the most common cause of decreased visual acuity after both vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Various strategies have been used for its treatment, such as intravitreal corticosteroids. The intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant (Iluvien®) is approved for the treatment of persisting diabetic macular edema and for the prevention of recurrence of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment. There are very few reports about its off-label use for post-surgical CME. We present four clinical cases of post-surgical CME (three following vitrectomy and one following cataract surgery in a vitrectomized eye 2 years ago). All of them had been previously treated with an average of four injections of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®), with repeated recurrence of CME. After treatment with Iluvien, three cases showed improvement of both visual acuity and macular anatomy, with resolution of the macular edema. One patient required additional treatment with Ozurdex during follow-up, further improving CME. Two of the cases required topical pressure lowering treatment, and none required filtering surgery. Iluvien could be an effective therapeutic option for persistent non-diabetic macular edema after vitrectomy or cataract surgery refractory to other intravitreal therapies, with the benefit of being able to provide longer recurrence-free periods.

Recurrent Toxoplasma Retinitis Treated with Long-Term Oral Antibiotics

Purpose: The purpose of this case was to report the inhibition of toxoplasma retinitis reactivation with long-term, low-dose antibiotics.Case summary: A 76-year-old woman complained of poor vision and floaters in her right eye. The corrected visual acuity (LogMAR) of the right eye was 0.5, and there was an area of yellow infiltration and dye leakage on the retinal fluorescein angiography images. Toxoplasma IgG were detected in the serum, the patient was diagnosed with toxoplasma retinitis, and the patient was advised oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, and steroids. Her visual acuity improved and the inflammation resolved. However, she again had decreased visual activity and retinal inflammation in her right eye after 5 months. The inflammation improved with oral steroids, but she was shifted to intravitreal dexamethasone because of the side effects of systemic steroids. Although the inflammation improved initially, there was worsening of inflammation (evidenced by vitreous opacity) after 2 months, which was treated with oral antibiotics. After vitrectomy for the removal of residual vitreous opacity, antibiotics were stopped because of the stable disease course. After discontinuation of the antibiotics, inflammation was noted again, and low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was administered. Low-dose antibiotics were continued for 5 months and the disease remained stable without any retinal inflammation.Conclusions: Long-term, low-dose oral antibiotics may prevent reactivation of recurrent toxoplasma retinitis.

Recommendations for the management of diabetic macular oedema with intravitreal dexamethasone implant: A national Delphi consensus study

Purpose The intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) is an alternative to anti-VEGF for the first-line treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). However, several questions remain regarding its routine use and its place in certain situations not always specified in current recommendations. A national consensus approach was, therefore, initiated by French retinal experts. Methods An iterative Delphi consensus approach was used. A steering committee (SC) of seven experts analysed data from the literature to formulate statements divided into five key areas of treatment. These statements were submitted to the independent and anonymous electronic vote of 87 French retina experts among whom 39 expressed their opinion and therefore constituted the voting panel. Results After two rounds of voting, 22 and 7 of 38 statements received a strong consensus and a good consensus, respectively. The consensus level was higher for statements regarding first-line indications and safety of DEX-I compared to those regarding efficacy assessment, reprocessing time or pathophysiological biomarkers. The panellists recommended the preferential use of DEX-I for patients with limited availability for multiple injections, those who needed to undergo cataract surgery or who had a recent cardiovascular history, and as a therapeutic alternative to anti-VEGF in patients with a history of vitrectomy, retinal serous detachment, hyper-reflective points or dry exudates in optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, some statements proposed by SC experts were not validated. Conclusion This study provides some key recommendations to clinicians treating diabetic macular oedema, which may be useful when using intravitreal dexamethasone implants in daily practice.

Macular and peripapillary microvasculature after dexamethasone injection in diabetic macular edema

Purpose To evaluate the microvascular changes in the macular and peripapillary area after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema (DME) Material and Methods We included 31 eyes of 31 patients treated with a single dose dexamethasone implant for DME. All subjects underwent swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography imaging before (T0), and one month (T1), two months (T2), and four months (T4) after dexamethasone injection. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area of superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP and DCP) was calculated by delineating the FAZ border using the measurement tool of the device. The vessel density (VD) of SCP and DCP and choriocapillaris (CC) in the macular and peripapillary area were automatically calculated. Results There was an insignificant reduction in FAZ area measurements of SCP after dexamethasone injection in DME patients (p = 0.846). The FAZ area of DCP were significantly smaller compared to T0 measurements at T1, T2, and T4 (p = 0.013, p = 0.031, and p = 0.029, respectively). The mean average parafoveal VD measurements were significantly decreased after dexamethasone injection in SCP and DCP (p = 0.004, p = 0.005). The peripapillary VD in retinal capillary plexuses and choriocapillaris showed no significant difference after dexamethasone injection. Conclusion Intravitreal dexamethasone leads to a significant FAZ area decrease in DCP with a reduction in parafoveal VD measurements. In addition, no significant VD changes were observed in the peripapillary area after dexamethasone. These findings indicate that dexamethasone may improve macular ischemia with no significant effects on peripapillary microvasculature in DME patients.