Trunk Stabilization Exercise Using a Both Sides Utilized Ball in Children With Spastic Diplegia: Case Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Yon-ju Sim ◽  
◽  
Jeong-soo Kim ◽  
Chung-hwi Yi ◽  
Heon-seock Cynn
Keyword(s):  
Spastic Diplegia ◽  
Stabilization Exercise ◽  
Trunk Stabilization

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Trunk Stabilization Exercise Combined with Vibration for Adolescent Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (19) ◽  
pp. 7024
Author(s):  
Kyoung-sim Jung ◽  
Jin-hwa Jung ◽  
Tae-sung In ◽  
Hwi-young Cho
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Stabilization Exercise ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
Trunk Stabilization

There are many adolescent patients complaining of low back pain, but research on it is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of trunk stabilization exercise combined with vibration on the pain, proprioception, and kinematics of the lumbar spine (LS) during sit to stand (STS) in adolescent patients with nonspecific low back pain (LBP). Fifty LBP patients were recruited and were randomly divided into two groups: Vibration group (n = 25) and placebo group (n = 25). All participants underwent 36-sessions of training consisting of six exercises. The Vibration group provided vibration stimulation during exercise, but the placebo group did not. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and digital dual inclinometer were used to measure pain intensity and proprioception. The kinematics of the lumbar spine during STS were measured by motion capture system. After training, the pain and proprioception in the vibration group improved significantly greater than the placebo group (p < 0.05). The mobility of LS (maximum range of motion, angular velocity, lumbar to hip movement ratios) and lumbar-hip coordination during STS in the vibration group were significantly improved compared to the placebo group (p < 0.05). Thus, trunk stabilization exercise combined with vibration may be used to improve the pain, proprioception, and kinematic of the lumbar spine during sit to stand in adolescent patients with LBP.

A case study on interface pressure pattern of two garment orthoses on a child with cerebral palsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 234 (8) ◽  
pp. 884-894
Author(s):  
Ida Hasni Shaari ◽  
Noor Azuan Abu Osman ◽  
Hanie Nadia Shasmin
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Maximum Pressure ◽  
Spastic Diplegia ◽  
Test Duration ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Interface Pressure ◽  
Truncal Ataxia ◽  
Sit To Stand ◽  
Different Levels

Many studies have shown that medical compression products produce different levels of interface pressure during the usage of the products. However, limited studies have explored the pattern of interface pressure exerted by orthotic garments. This case study aimed to investigate the pattern of interface pressure exerted by two types of orthotic garments on a child with cerebral palsy. A 13-year-old child diagnosed with ataxic spastic diplegia cerebral palsy has difficulty to perform sit-to-stand motion even with a walking frame due to his truncal ataxia. A TheraTogsTM orthosis and a Dynamic Lycra® Fabric Orthosis (DLFO) were prepared for the child. The child’s sit-to-stand ability without and with the usage of orthoses was recorded using five sit-to-stand tests. The garments’ interface pressure was measured using F-scan (9811E) and F-scan 6.5.1 version software. The pressure was recorded when the child was in sitting position and performing sit-to-stand-to-sit motion. Overall, the child completed the five sit-to-stand test duration within 2.53 ± 0.04 s and 2.51 ± 0.09 s with the usage of TheraTogsTM orthosis and DLFO, respectively. Higher pressure was exerted by Dynamic Lycra Fabric Orthosis (axillary = 122 mmHg) in contrast to TheraTogsTM orthosis (77 mmHg) when the child was in a sitting position. Lower pressure was exerted by DLFO (7 mmHg), over xiphoid level and for TheraTogsTM orthosis is 1.2 mmHg over axillary level when the child was performing sit-to-stand motion. The largest range of pressure was exerted by TheraTogsTM orthosis with a minimum pressure of 5 mmHg and a maximum pressure of 155 mmHg during sit-to-stand motion. Overall, the DLFO exerted higher mean interface pressure on the child in comparison to TheraTogsTM orthosis when the child’s body was in a sitting position wearing both upper garment and pants. Both TheraTogsTM orthosis and DLFO presented a different range of interface pressure over different body segments and activities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document