scholarly journals Innovative Education Reform of Intelligent Robot Teaching Construction

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 377-380
Author(s):  
祥进 曾
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Juan Xie ◽  
Yan Yang

This article first provides an overview of the Internet of Things technology, mainly analyzing the characteristics of the Internet of Things technology and the impact of core technologies on education reform; secondly, it studies the specific impact of the Internet of Things technology on the education reform of local applied universities, which is mainly divided into three On the one hand, it promotes the construction of smart campus, the second is the realization of personalized learning methods, and the third is the promotion of smart teaching. Subsequently, the intelligent teaching based on the intelligent robot platform was proposed and the teaching demonstration was carried out. This research conducted an empirical study on third-year university students as the objects of teaching implementation. In the preparatory stage of teaching, the micro-curriculum of guided learning is produced, teaching activities are designed, and the study attitude and learner satisfaction questionnaire and interview outline are compiled. After the empirical teaching, analyzing the empirical results and related data, it is found that the application of intelligent robots in science courses can stimulate students’ interest in and enthusiasm in science courses; it can improve students’ creative thinking level and students’ learning satisfaction. Students’ perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of the intelligent robot platform will affect students’ learning satisfaction, thereby affecting the teaching effect.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Braun ◽  
Bernhard Leidner

This article contributes to the conceptual and empirical distinction between (the assessment of) appraisals of teaching behavior and (the assessment of) self-reported competence acquirement within academic course evaluation. The Bologna Process, the current higher-education reform in Europe, emphasizes education aimed toward vocationally oriented competences and demands the certification of acquired competences. Currently available evaluation questionnaires measure the students’ satisfaction with a lecturer’s behavior, whereas the “Evaluation in Higher Education: Self-Assessed Competences” (HEsaCom) measures the students’ personal benefit in terms of competences. In a sample of 1403 German students, we administered a scale of satisfaction with teaching behavior and the German version of the HEsaCom at the same time. Using confirmatory factor analysis, the estimated correlations between the various scales of self-rated competences and teaching behavior appraisals were moderate to strong, yet the constructs were shown to be empirically distinct. We conclude that the self-rated gains in competences are distinct from satisfaction with course and instructor. In line with the higher education reform, self-reported gains in competences are an important aspect of academic course evaluation, which should be taken into account in the future and might be able to restructure the view of “quality of higher education.” The English version of the HEsaCom is presented in the Appendix .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document