Research on Tree Flash Failure Analysis and Tree Line Distance Prediction Method for Transmission Line

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 92-97
Author(s):  
赫 刘
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianqi Li ◽  
Xiuping Shi ◽  
Nan Cao ◽  
Zhetao Gu ◽  
Sidong Zhao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 911-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liqiang An ◽  
Yongyu Guan ◽  
Zhijian Zhu ◽  
Jiong Wu ◽  
Ronglun Zhang

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huili Chen ◽  
Guoliang Liu ◽  
Guohui Tian ◽  
Jianhua Zhang ◽  
Ze Ji

<div>In dynamic environment, the suddenly appeared </div><div>human or other moving obstacles can affect the safety of the </div><div>bridge crane. For such dangerous situation, the bridge crane </div><div>must predict potential collisions between the payload and the </div><div>obstacle, keep safe distance while the swing of the payload must </div><div>be considered in the mean time. Therefore, the safe distance is </div><div>not a constant value, which must be adaptive to the relative </div><div>speed of the bridge crane. However, as far as we know, the </div><div>mathematical model between the safe distance and the relative </div><div>speed of the bridge crane has never been fully discussed. In </div><div>this paper, we propose a safe distance prediction method using </div><div>model prediction control (MPC), which can make sure that the </div><div>crane can stop before the obstacle, and avoid possible collisions, </div><div>while the relative speed and anti-swing are both considered. The </div><div>experimental results prove the effectiveness of our idea.</div>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huili Chen ◽  
Guoliang Liu ◽  
Guohui Tian ◽  
Jianhua Zhang ◽  
Ze Ji

<div>In dynamic environment, the suddenly appeared </div><div>human or other moving obstacles can affect the safety of the </div><div>bridge crane. For such dangerous situation, the bridge crane </div><div>must predict potential collisions between the payload and the </div><div>obstacle, keep safe distance while the swing of the payload must </div><div>be considered in the mean time. Therefore, the safe distance is </div><div>not a constant value, which must be adaptive to the relative </div><div>speed of the bridge crane. However, as far as we know, the </div><div>mathematical model between the safe distance and the relative </div><div>speed of the bridge crane has never been fully discussed. In </div><div>this paper, we propose a safe distance prediction method using </div><div>model prediction control (MPC), which can make sure that the </div><div>crane can stop before the obstacle, and avoid possible collisions, </div><div>while the relative speed and anti-swing are both considered. The </div><div>experimental results prove the effectiveness of our idea.</div>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Jinbo Xu

AbstractInter-residue distance prediction by deep ResNet (convolutional residual neural network) has greatly advanced protein structure prediction. Currently the most successful structure prediction methods predict distance by discretizing it into dozens of bins. Here we study how well real-valued distance can be predicted and how useful it is for 3D structure modeling by comparing it with discrete-valued prediction based upon the same deep ResNet. Different from the recent methods that predict only a single real value for the distance of an atom pair, we predict both the mean and standard deviation of a distance and then employ a novel method to fold a protein by the predicted mean and deviation. Our findings include: 1) tested on the CASP13 FM (free-modeling) targets, our real-valued distance prediction obtains 81% precision on top L/5 long-range contact prediction, much better than the best CASP13 results (70%); 2) our real-valued prediction can predict correct folds for the same number of CASP13 FM targets as the best CASP13 group, despite generating only 20 decoys for each target; 3) our method greatly outperforms a very new real-valued prediction method DeepDist in both contact prediction and 3D structure modeling; and 4) when the same deep ResNet is used, our real-valued distance prediction has 1-6% higher contact and distance accuracy than our own discrete-valued prediction, but less accurate 3D structure models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document