scholarly journals [Erratum] A Prospective Study of Bowstringing after A1 Pulley Release of Trigger Thumb: Percutaneous versus Open Technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Kwang-Hee Park ◽  
Jae-Uk Jung ◽  
Seok-Won Yang ◽  
Won-Jung Shin ◽  
Jong-Pil Kim
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Kwang-Hee Park ◽  
Jae-Uk Jung ◽  
Seok-Won Yang ◽  
Won-Jung Shin ◽  
Jong-Pil Kim

1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Folliguet ◽  
E. Le Bret ◽  
A. Moneta ◽  
S. Musumeci ◽  
F. Laborde

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. BORETTO ◽  
V. ALFIE ◽  
A. DONNDORFF ◽  
G. GALLUCCI ◽  
P. DE CARLI

A prospective study was performed in 19 patients with trigger thumbs to define the anatomy of the A1 pulley of the thumb in this condition and to evaluate biomechanical parameters of the thumb after complete division of the A1 pulley. Pre- and postoperatively, flexion of the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints, key pinch strength and tip pinch strength were measured and compared with these measurements on the contralateral thumb. We identified three types of A1 pulley. The clinical data showed that there is no deficit with respect to motion and strength of the thumb after completely sectioning any of the three types of A1 pulley.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 521-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. AL-QATTAN

In a prospective study of 50 adult patients with primary idiopathic trigger finger, four patients (8%) required simultaneous division of the proximal 3 to 4 mm of the A2 pulley as well as the A1 pulley in order to completely resolve the triggering. At final follow up at 6 to 12 months, all patients were symptom-free with a full range of motion of the fingers. This entity is discussed.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Aktekin ◽  
Taha Karaman ◽  
Yesim Yigiter Senol ◽  
Sukru Erdem ◽  
Hakan Erengin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document