scholarly journals Computer-Assisted Cognitive Training for Patients with Severe Mental Illness: a Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Ching-Man Lau ◽  
Wai-Kwong Tang
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-153
Author(s):  
Mackenzie T. Jones ◽  
Philip D. Harvey

Aggressive and violent behavior, including both verbal and physical aggression, have considerable adverse consequences for people with schizophrenia. There are several potential causes of violent behavior on the part of people with severe mental illness, which include intellectual impairments, cognitive and social-cognitive deficits, skills deficits, substance abuse, antisocial features, and specific psychotic features. This review explores the interventions that have been tested to this date. Computerized Cognitive Training (CCT) or Computerized Social-Cognitive Training (CSCT) have been associated with reductions in violence. Combined CCT and CSCT have been found to improve social cognition and neurocognition, as well as everyday functioning when combined with rehabilitation interventions. These interventions have been shown to reduce violence in schizophrenia patients across multiple environments, including forensic settings. The reductions in violence and aggression have manifested in various ways, including reduced violent thinking and behavior, reduced physical and violent assaults, and reduced disruptive and aggressive behaviors. Effects of cognitive training may be associated with improvements in problem-solving and the increased ability to deploy alternative strategies. The effect of social cognition training on violence reduction appears to be direct, with improvements in violence related to the extent of improvement in social cognition. There are still remaining issues to be addressed in the use of CCT and CSCT, and the benefits should not be overstated; however, the results of these interventions are very promising.


2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 261-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. C. Wieshmann ◽  
M. Anjoyeb ◽  
B. B. Lucas

Aims and MethodMental illness may cause specific problems in the environment of an international airport. The aim of our study was to assess frequency, presentation and safety implications of mental disorders requiring formal admission at an international airport. We performed a retrospective study over 4 years including patients who were detained by the police and admitted.ResultsThe frequency of admissions was one per million passengers, the frequency of incidents raising safety concerns was four per 10 million passengers. An in-flight disturbance occurred in 1.4 per 10 million arriving passengers. Most common were schizophrenia or schizotypal disorder (46.8%) and mania (22.6%). Twenty per cent of patients presented with wandering.Clinical ImplicationsEmergency admissions and incidents causing safety concerns were rare. Airport wandering was a frequent presenting sign that should be recognised.


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. S263
Author(s):  
Cynthia Burton ◽  
Brittany Wright ◽  
Benjamin Hampstead ◽  
Ivy Tso ◽  
Stephan Taylor

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1492-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Joska ◽  
Ade Obayemi ◽  
Henri Cararra ◽  
Katherine Sorsdahl

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 948-948
Author(s):  
C Burton ◽  
I Tso ◽  
B Hampstead ◽  
S Taylor

Abstract Objective Technological advances in neuromodulation and cognitive remediation provide opportunities to develop novel interventions, though a critical first determination is whether such treatments are feasible and acceptable to participants. This study evaluated a combined transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and computerized cognitive training intervention for individuals with severe mental illness; we examined participant recruitment, retention, and adherence to the interventions, along with qualitative feedback. Method Participants included adults with schizophrenia-spectrum or bipolar disorder and impaired working memory (performance ≤1 standard deviation below average of healthy individuals on a spatial span or letter-number span test). In this randomized crossover study, all participants received the combined intervention (ten tDCS sessions in the clinic concurrent with cognitive training), and ten hours of at-home training, and completed neuropsychological and clinical assessments at three time points. Results To date, thirteen participants provided informed consent. Seven participants were screened out; five exceeded the cognitive cutoff and one did not meet the diagnostic criterion. No remaining participants have withdrawn prior to study completion. Four participants completed all tDCS sessions, and one completed 80%. No tDCS session has been discontinued. At-home training has proven more challenging; only one participant completed all ten hours, and three did not complete any at all. Participant feedback has been positive; all expressed satisfaction with both treatments though some said symptoms or busy schedules interfered with at-home training. Conclusions Combining tDCS with computerized cognitive training appears feasible and acceptable. Strategic recruitment efforts to capture those with cognitive impairment appears necessary, as well as troubleshooting barriers to at-home training.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document