Therapeutic Efficacy of Conventional Treatment Combined with Manuka Honey in the Treatment of Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers : A Randomized Controlled Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 1064-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Al Saeed
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Conventional Treatment ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Manuka Honey ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Blind Comparative study between Silver nanoparticles dressings and Standard Moist Wound Dressings (SMWD) in management of diabetic foot ulcers

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abdelaal ◽  
Mostafa Soliman ◽  
Hany Rafik ◽  
Mohamed Emam ◽  
Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamed Elsadek
Keyword(s):  
Silver Nanoparticles ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Wound Dressing ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are the main cause of hospitalization in diabetic patients and they are considered a major worldwide health problem. Thus, there is a need to evaluate various treatment modalities. In this study we will assess the clinical efficacy of Silver nanoparticles dressing vs Standard Moist Wound Dressing (SMWD) in management of diabetic foot ulcers. Objective To compare wound outcome, limb salvage, healing time of diabetes related foot ulcers and cost effectiveness in terms of duration of hospital stay between Silver nanotechnology dressings and Standard moist wound therapy (SMWT) in management of diabetic foot ulcers. Patients and Methods This is a prospective randomized controlled study involving 34 patients with active diabetic foot ulcers, in a high volume tertiary referral vascular center. They were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients (group A) were prescribed SMWD and the other 17 patients (group B) received Silver nanoparticles wound dressing. Results Our study correlates with the study conducted by K.Suhas et al. which had observed that Silver nanoparticles wound dressing was safe and effective treatment for complex diabetic foot wounds and could lead to higher proportion of healed wounds and faster healing rates. At the end of the study, group B promised a better outcome as compared to group A. Conclusion The role of Silver nanoparticles wound dressing in healing of diabetic foot ulcers has been proposed as a novel method of manipulating the chronic wound environment in a way that it reduces bacterial burden and chronic interstitial wound fluid, increases vascularity and cytokine expression and to an extent mechanically exploiting the viscoelasticity of peri wound tissues.

scholarly journals A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Study of Nanocrystalline Silver, Manuka Honey, and Conventional Dressing in Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcer

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka-Kit Tsang ◽  
Enid Wai-Yung Kwong ◽  
Tony Shing-Shun To ◽  
Joanne Wai-Yee Chung ◽  
Thomas Kwok-Shing Wong
Keyword(s):  
Ulcer Healing ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Foot Ulcer ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcer ◽  
Size Reduction ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Manuka Honey ◽  
Ulcer Size ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Nanocrystalline silver (nAg) and Manuka honey (MH) dressing have increasing popularity for treating diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). This study was an open-label randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups’ design in examining the preliminary effectiveness of nAg against MH and conventional dressing in healing DFU in terms of ulcer healing, ulcer infection, and inflammation. 31 participants (11 in the nAg group, 10 in the MH group, and 10 in the convention group) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Wound cleaning, debridement, and topical dressing application were performed according to the group allocation in each visit at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The results found that the proportions of complete ulcer healing were 81.8%, 50%, and 40% in the nAg, MH, and conventional groups, respectively. The ulcer size reduction rate was potentially higher in the nAg group (97.45%) than the MH group (86.21%) and the conventional group (75.17%). In bacteriology, nAg showed a greater rate of microorganism reduction although it was not significant. To conclude, nAg alginate was potentially superior to MH and conventional dressing in healing diabetic foot ulcer in terms of ulcer size reduction rate.

scholarly journals Cellular Proliferation, Dermal Repair, and Microbiological Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Assisted Wound Debridement (UAW) Versus Standard Wound Treatment in Complicated Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU): An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 4032
Author(s):  
José Luis Lázaro-Martínez ◽  
Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso ◽  
David Sevillano-Fernández ◽  
Yolanda García-Álvarez ◽  
Irene Sanz-Corbalan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Cellular Proliferation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Surgical Debridement ◽  
Foot Ulcers ◽  
Diabetic Foot Ulcers ◽  
Wound Debridement ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ultrasound Assisted ◽  
Surgical Group

We aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrasound-assisted wound (UAW) debridement on cellular proliferation and dermal repair in complicated diabetic foot ulcers as compared to diabetic foot ulcers receiving surgical/sharp wound debridement. A randomized controlled trial was performed involving 51 outpatients with complicated diabetic foot ulcers that either received surgical debridement (n = 24) or UAW debridement (n = 27) every week during a six-week treatment period. Compared to patients receiving surgical debridement, patients treated with UAW debridement exhibited significantly improved cellular proliferation, as determined by CD31 staining, Masson’s trichrome staining, and actin staining. Bacterial loads were significantly reduced in the UAW debridement group compared to the surgical group (UAW group 4.27 ± 0.37 day 0 to 2.11 ± 0.8 versus surgical group 4.66 ± 1.21 day 0 to 4.39 ± 1.24 day 42; p = 0.01). Time to healing was also significantly lower (p = 0.04) in the UAW group (9.7 ± 3.8 weeks) compared to the surgical group (14.8 ± 12.3 weeks), but both groups had similar rates of patients that were healed after six months of follow-up (23 patients (85.1%) in the UAW group vs. 20 patients (83.3%) in the surgical group; p = 0.856). We propose that UAW debridement could be an effective alternative when surgical debridement is not available or is contraindicated for use on patients with complicated diabetic foot ulcers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document