الشراكة عبر الأطلسية للتجارة و الاستثمار : حلف ناتو اقتصادي بدوافع جيوستراتيجية = The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership ( TTIP ) as the New NATO : An Economic Partnership with Geostrategic Objectives

2016 ◽  
pp. 46-59
Author(s):  
محمد مطاوع
Keyword(s):  
Transatlantic Trade ◽  
Economic Partnership ◽  
Trade And Investment

Újabb megaregionális szabadkereskedelmi egyezmény: az Átfogó Regionális Gazdasági Partnerség (RCEP)

Külgazdaság ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 69-89
Author(s):  
György Csáki
Keyword(s):  
World Trade Organization ◽  
World Trade ◽  
Transatlantic Trade ◽  
Economic Partnership ◽  
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ◽  
Trade And Investment

A tanulmány célja a közelmúltban aláírt Regionális Átfogó Gazdasági Partnerség- (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership – RCEP) egyezmény bemutatása és elemzése. A tágan értelmezett előzmények között röviden ismerteti a Transzatlanti Kereskedelmi és Befektetési Partnerség (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership – TTIP), a Transz-csendes-óceáni Partnerség (Trans-Pacific Partnership – TPP) és az Átfogó és Előremutató Csendes-óceáni Partnerség (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership – CPTPP) létrejöttének körülményeit is. Ezek a törekvések elválaszthatatlanok attól a ténytől, hogy a Kereskedelmi Világszervezet (World Trade Organization – WTO) 1995. évi megalapítása óta képtelen volt bármilyen fontos sokoldalú megállapodás elérésére, a Vitarendezési Testület tagjainak elmaradt jelölése következtében immár teljesen működésképtelenné vált. Az RCEP (a CPTPP-vel együtt) Ázsia és a csendes-óceáni térség további felértékelődését, ugyanakkor az USA befolyásának gyengülését jelzi a régióban.

scholarly journals Transregionalism and fictive capital

2019 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 04033
Author(s):  
Daria Dinetc ◽  
Mikhail Konotopov
Keyword(s):  
Circulation Model ◽  
Global Finance ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Russian Economy ◽  
Transatlantic Trade ◽  
The World ◽  
Economic Partnership ◽  
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership ◽  
Trade And Investment ◽  
Practical Recommendations

A relevance of research is recent trend in regrouping forces in the global financial arena with transregional unions based on fictive capital’ expansion. The objective of this research is revisal of transregional integration conditions by the analysis of modern geopolitical aims of the world financial system’s leaders and also it is practical recommendations forming to prevent the Russian economy trapping by the fictive capital of transregional unions. It has been shown that the global finance circulation model is drastically changing - trade and economic unions like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership or Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership are aimed at forming the markets for goods, works and services produced in countries, which have been proclaimed as the world financial centres. That politics doesn’t allow to develop industry and it arrive to financial bubbles at branches of economy, which are cooperated with transregional financial flows. For the leaders of transregional groups, it’s a way to solve geopolitical problems with financial methods shifting responsibility for their mistakes in industrial policy. There are significant features of the east and west leaders dominance in transregional unions in the article. These are respectively hub infrastructure dependence and currency speculations. The conclusion is it should be formed a secured non-speculative currency in transregional union for geopolitical dependence eliminate. Besides the only reason for infrastructure international project realize could be an economic efficiency. These conclusions are very important for the modern stage of the globalization.

Intellectual Property and Mega-Regional Trade Agreements

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Cottier
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Trade Agreements ◽  
Cooperation Agreement ◽  
Transatlantic Trade ◽  
Wto Dispute Settlement ◽  
Innovation And Technology ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Partnership Agreement ◽  
Trade And Investment

The chapter assesses recent developments in intellectual property protection in the EU–Canadian Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, and extrapolates results of these negotiations to the pending EU–US negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). It discusses the likely implications of ever-increasing protection of IPRs on international trade, innovation, and technology transfer. Given the complex interaction of TRIPs and WIPO Agreements with the newly emerging agreements, the chapter finally examines the structure and operation of dispute settlement and how existing fragmentation could be overcome. Intellectual property, it is submitted, offers an important case to extend the jurisdiction of WTO dispute settlement to preferential trade agreements.

Who Settles Disputes? Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes Toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 881-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyeonho Hahm ◽  
Thomas König ◽  
Moritz Osnabrügge ◽  
Elena Frech
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Market Access ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Public Support ◽  
Trade Agreement ◽  
Dispute Settlement Mechanism ◽  
Design Elements ◽  
Transatlantic Trade ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Trade And Investment

AbstractWhat type of trade agreement is the public willing to accept? Instead of focusing on individual concerns about market access and trade barriers, we argue that specific treaty design and, in particular, the characteristics of the dispute settlement mechanism, play a critical role in shaping public support for trade agreements. To examine this theoretical expectation, we conduct a conjoint experiment that varies diverse treaty-design elements and estimate preferences over multiple dimensions of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) based on a nationally representative sample in Germany. We find that compared to other alternatives, private arbitration, known as investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS), generates strong opposition to the trade agreement. As the single most important factor, this effect of dispute settlement characteristic is strikingly large and consistent across individuals’ key attributes, including skill levels, information, and national sentiment, among others.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document