scholarly journals Commuting-Adjusted Short-Term Health Impact Assessment of Airborne Fine Particles with Uncertainty Quantification via Monte Carlo Simulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Baccini ◽  
Laura Grisotto ◽  
Dolores Catelan ◽  
Dario Consonni ◽  
Pier Alberto Bertazzi ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-100
Author(s):  
Roberto San José ◽  
◽  
Juan L. Pérez ◽  
Libia Pérez ◽  
Rosa Maria Gonzalez Barras ◽  
...  

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Mathilde Pascal ◽  
Jean-Marc Yvon ◽  
Magali Corso ◽  
Myriam Blanchard ◽  
Perrine De Crouy-Chanel ◽  
...  

This article illustrates how a health impact assessment (HIA) can be used to promote a collaborative discussion among stakeholders as part of a local action plan aimed at improving air quality. We performed a HIA of the mortality impacts of long-term exposure to fine particles PM2.5 in the Arve Valley in France. This narrow valley can experience high levels of pollution mostly during winter. However, local stakeholders expressed strong, contradictory opinions on the associated health impacts. Our HIA helped overcome existing silos and shifted the overriding question from “Is it true that air pollution kills people?” to “What can we do to improve air quality?” HIAs have proven to be an excellent decision-support tool in many contexts. In addition, they should continue to be useful provided that their scope, specific objectives, choices, calculation assumptions, and limitations are thoroughly explained to all stakeholders and made easily accessible.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Benaissa ◽  
Cara Nichole Maesano ◽  
Rezak Alkama ◽  
Isabella Annesi-Maesano

We used Health Impact Assessment (HIA) to analyze the impact on a given population’s health outcomes in terms of all-causes mortality and respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations attributable to short-term exposure to particulate matter less than 10 μm diameter (PM10) in Bejaia city, for which health effects of air pollution have never been investigated. Two scenarios of PM10reduction were considered: first, a scenario where the PM10annual mean is decreased by 5 µg/m3, and then a scenario where this PM10mean is decreased to 20 µg/m3(World Health Organization annual air quality guideline (WHO-AQG)). Annual mean level of PM10(81.7 µg/m3) was calculated from objective measurements assessedin situ. Each year, about 4 and 55 deaths could be postponed with the first and the second scenarios successfully. Furthermore, decreasing PM10annual mean by 5 µg/m3would avoid 5 and 3 respiratory and cardiac hospitalizations, respectively, and not exceeding the PM10WHO-AQG (20 µg/m3) would result in a potential gain of 36 and 23 per 100000 respiratory and cardiac hospitalizations, respectively. Lowering in current levels of PM10has a nonnegligible impact in terms of public health that it is expected to be higher in the case of long-term effects.


Epidemiology ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. S221
Author(s):  
C Boudet ◽  
E Nerrière ◽  
J F. Viel ◽  
S Gauvin ◽  
D Zmirou-Navier

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Maki ◽  
Munirih Qualls ◽  
Benjamin White ◽  
Sharon Kleefield ◽  
Robert Crone

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusef Omidi ◽  
Gholamreza Goudarzi ◽  
Ali Mirza Heidari ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Daryanoosh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document