Virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 270-274
Author(s):  
Timothy J Batten ◽  
Gabriel Fieraru ◽  
Helen Williams ◽  
Jenny Wingham ◽  
Iain Findlay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Potential Productivity ◽  
Knee Joint Replacement ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Virtual Clinic

The Royal Cornwall Hospital virtual clinic service was implemented to follow up hip and knee joint replacement patients in line with national guidelines. In total, 300 patients were followed up via a virtual clinic during the first 11 months, and another 520 patients, who were already undergoing conventional face-to-face follow-up, were recruited to the new service for future follow up after consenting and registering with a web-based system for collecting patient reported outcome measures. There were high levels of patient satisfaction: patients found it effective, quick and easy. However, they missed the personal interaction, which occurs during face-to-face appointments. Only 21% of slots were filled and use of the service varied by surgical teams from 6–54%. Further improvements are planned to fulfil a potential productivity gain that converts two face-to-face appointments into five virtual clinic appointments. Following implementation, our local Clinical Commissioning Group awarded a Commissioning for Quality and Innovation grant of £216 000 to sustain the service beyond its first year.

scholarly journals Is virtual clinic follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement acceptable to patients and clinicians? A sequential mixed methods evaluation

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebekah J Parkes ◽  
Joanne Palmer ◽  
Jennifer Wingham ◽  
Dan H Williams
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
District General Hospital ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Knee Joint Replacement ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Virtual Clinic

ObjectiveTo evaluate the acceptability to key stake holders of a newly introduced virtual clinic follow-up pathway for hip and knee joint replacement.DesignA service evaluation comprising a questionnaire sent electronically to 115 patients and interviews with 10 individuals.SettingA newly introduced virtual clinic follow-up pathway for hip and knee replacement patients in a district general hospital.ParticipantsThe electronic questionnaire was distributed to all patients treated under the virtual clinic service over a 5-month period (n=115). Purposive sampling from volunteers among respondents, leading to semi-structured interviews with eight patients. Two orthopaedic consultants were also interviewed.InterventionConsultant review of web-based patient reported outcome measures and digital radiographs, with feedback to patients via letter, replacing face-to-face outpatient appointments for the follow-up of hip and knee joint replacement.ResultsThe response rate to the questionnaire was 40%. 44% indicated they would prefer a virtual appointment over a face-to-face consultation in future. The most common word in the free text comments was ‘good’ (n=107).Seven main themes were identified from the patient interviews: patient understanding and expectations, patient confidence, patient voice, managing deterioration of condition, patient benefit, patient satisfaction using technology and navigating the website.Two main themes were identified from the staff interviews: the adapting patient pathway and project management.Combined analysis elucidated that patients who were doing well liked the ‘click and go’ approach but those with problems were concerned about how to report these and were therefore less satisfied.ConclusionThe virtual clinic process appears to be well accepted by both patients and clinicians. However, appropriate patient selection and clear pathways of communication to address patient concerns are pivotal to success.

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measures following revision knee replacement: a review of PROM instrument utilisation and measurement properties using the COSMIN checklist

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e046169
Author(s):  
Shiraz A Sabah ◽  
Elizabeth A Hedge ◽  
Simon G F Abram ◽  
Abtin Alvand ◽  
Andrew J Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Knee Joint Replacement ◽  
Cosmin Checklist ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesTo identify: (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to evaluate symptoms, health status or quality of life following discretionary revision (or re-revision) knee joint replacement, and (2) validated joint-specific PROMs, their measurement properties and quality of evidence.Design(1) Scoping review; (2) systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsycINFO were searched from inception to 1 July 2020 using the Oxford PROM filter unlimited by publication date or language.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesStudies reporting on the development, validation or outcome of a joint-specific PROM for revision knee joint replacement were included.Results51 studies reported PROM outcomes using eight joint-specific PROMs. 27 out of 51 studies (52.9%) were published within the last 5 years. PROM development was rated ‘inadequate’ for each of the eight PROMs studied. Validation studies were available for only three joint-specific PROMs: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). 25 out of 27 (92.6%) measurement properties were rated insufficient, indeterminate or not assessed. The quality of supporting evidence was mostly low or very low. Each of the validated PROMs was rated ‘B’ (potential for recommendation but require further evaluation).ConclusionJoint-specific PROMs are increasingly used to report outcomes following revision knee joint replacement, but these instruments have insufficient evidence for their validity. Future research should be directed toward understanding the measurement properties of these instruments in order to inform clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the outcomes from joint-specific PROMs.

scholarly journals Extended follow-up of patients suspected of having joint sepsis after total joint replacement

1985 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 655-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. M. Lidwell ◽  
E. J. L. Lowbury ◽  
W. Whyte ◽  
R. Blowers ◽  
D. Lowe
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Failure Rate ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Total Joint Replacement ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Hospital Records ◽  
Knee Joint Replacement ◽  
Total Hip

SUMMARYDuring an average follow-up time of about 2½ years after total hip or knee-joint replacement in 8052 patients, suspected joint infection was recorded in 85 patients whose joints had not been re-operated during that period. The hospital records of 72 of these patients were examined after a further period, averaging about 5 years. Thirty-five of these had suffered continuing major problems with the joint, 18 of which had been revised, and a further 9 joints needed such treatment. Infection was confirmed in 17 of the 35. These numbers are proportionately about three times greater than those observed among a set of matched controls followed-up for a similar period. The evidence from the extended follow-up suggests that the failure rate, unassociated with infection, reached about 5% by 7 years after operation and that late infections, manifested between about 2½ and 7 years after operation, were about as frequent as those confirmed during the first 2½ years.

scholarly journals Are responders to patient health surveys representative of those invited to participate? An analysis of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Pilot from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254196
Author(s):  
Ian A. Harris ◽  
Kara Cashman ◽  
Michelle Lorimer ◽  
Yi Peng ◽  
Ilana Ackerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Telephone Call ◽  
Joint Replacement Registry ◽  
Asa Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to evaluate surgical outcome in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery, however routine collection from the target population is often incomplete. Representative samples are required to allow inference from the sample to the population. Although higher capture rates are desired, the extent to which this improves the representativeness of the sample is not known. We aimed to measure the representativeness of data collected using an electronic PROMs capture system with or without telephone call follow up, and any differences in PROMS reporting between electronic and telephone call follow up. Methods Data from a pilot PROMs program within a large national joint replacement registry were examined. Telephone call follow up was used for people that failed to respond electronically. Data were collected pre-operatively and at 6 months post-operatively. Responding groups (either electronic only or electronic plus telephone call follow up) were compared to non-responders based on patient characteristics (joint replaced, bilaterality, age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score and Body Mass Index (BMI)) using chi squared test or ANOVA, and PROMs for the two responder groups were compared using generalised linear models adjusted for age and sex. The analysis was restricted to those undergoing primary elective hip, knee or shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis. Results Pre-operatively, 73.2% of patients responded electronically and telephone follow-up of non-responders increased this to 91.4%. Pre-operatively, patients responding electronically, compared to all others, were on average younger, more likely to be female, and healthier (lower ASA score). Similar differences were found when telephone follow up was included in the responding group. There were little (if any) differences in the post-operative comparisons, where electronic responders were on average one year younger and were more likely to have a lower ASA score compared to those not responding electronically, but there was no significant difference in sex or BMI. PROMs were similar between those reporting electronically and those reporting by telephone. Conclusion Patients undergoing total joint replacement who provide direct electronic PROMs data are younger, healthier and more likely to be female than non-responders, but these differences are small, particularly for post-operative data collection. The addition of telephone call follow up to electronic contact does not provide a more representative sample. Electronic-only follow up of patients undergoing joint replacement provides a satisfactory representation of the population invited to participate.

scholarly journals Total knee joint replacement

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
V. I. Nuzhdin ◽  
T. P. Popova
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Postoperative Management ◽  
Knee Joint Replacement ◽  
Bilateral Knee ◽  
Total Knee

During 1990-95 total knee joint replacement using endoprostheses of Biomet, USA, ESKA Medical, Germany, Intermedics Orthopedics were performed in 15 patients. Follow-up period was from 1 to 5 years, all results were favourable. Surgical technique and postoperative management are described. The case of success full bilateral knee joint replacement is presented.

Significance of patient-reported outcomes for occupational resumption and quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Salzwedel ◽  
I Koran ◽  
E Langheim ◽  
A Schlitt ◽  
J Nothroff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Returning To Work

Abstract Introduction Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs based on the bio-psycho-social approach of the international classification of functioning and disease are carried out to achieve improved prognosis, superior health-related quality of life (HRQL) and social integration. We aimed to identify predictors of returning to work (RTW) and HRQL among cardiovascular risk factors and physical performance as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) modifiable during CR. Methods We designed a prospective observational multi-center study and enrolled 1,586 patients (2017/18) in 12 German rehabilitation centers regardless of their primary allocation diagnoses (e.g. acute myocardial infarction (AMI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular disease). Besides general data (e.g. age, gender, diagnoses), parameters of risk factor management (e.g. smoking, lipid profile, hypertension, lifestyle change motivation), physical performance (e.g. maximum exercise capacity, endurance training load, 6-min walking distance), and PROMs (e.g. depression, heart-focused anxiety, HRQL, subjective well-being, somatic and mental health, pain, general self-efficacy, pension desire as well as self-assessment of occupational prognosis using several questionnaires) were documented at CR admission and discharge. 6 months after discharge, status of RTW and HRQL (SF-12) were captured by a follow-up (FU) survey and analyzed in multivariable regression models with multiple imputation of missing values. Results Out of the study participants, 1,262 patients (54±7 years, 77% men) responded to the follow-up survey and could be analyzed regarding the outcome parameters. Most of them were assigned to CR primarily due to AMI (40%) or CAD without myocardial infarction (18%), followed by heart valve diseases in 12% of patients and CABG (8%). 864 patients (69%) returned to work within the follow-up period. Pension desire, negative self-assessed occupational prognosis, heart-focussed anxiety, major life events, smoking and heart failure were negatively associated with RTW, while higher endurance training load, HRQL and work stress were positively associated (Figure 1). HRQL after 6 months was determined more by PROMs (e.g. pension desire, heart-focused anxiety, physical/mental HRQL in SF-12, physical/mental health in indicators of rehab-status questionnaire (IRES-24), stress, well-being in the World Health Organization well-being index and self-efficacy expectations) than by clinical parameters or physical performance. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome measures predominantly influenced RTW and HRQL in heart-disease patients, whereas patients' pension desire and heart-focussed anxiety had a dominant impact on all investigated endpoints. Therefore, the multi-component CR approach focussing on psychosocial support is crucial for subjective health prognosis and occupational resumption. Figure 1. Predictors of returning to work Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): German pension insurance

scholarly journals Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine: analysis of patient-reported outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjsrh-2020-200954
Author(s):  
Chelsey Porter Erlank ◽  
Jonathan Lord ◽  
Kathryn Church
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
High Satisfaction ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
At Home

IntroductionThe English government approved both stages of early medical abortion (EMA), using mifepristone and misoprostol under 10 weeks’ gestation, for at-home use on 30 March 2020. MSI Reproductive Choices UK (MSUK), one of the largest providers of abortion services in England, launched a no-test telemedicine EMA pathway on 6 April 2020. The objectives of this study were to report key patient-reported outcome measures and to assess whether our sample was representative of the whole population receiving no-test telemedicine EMA.MethodsA sample of all MSUK’s telemedicine EMA patients between April and August 2020 were invited to opt in to a follow-up call to answer clinical and satisfaction questions. A total of 1243 (13.7% of all telemedicine EMAs) were successfully followed-up, on average within 5 days post-procedure.ResultsPatients reported high confidence in telemedicine EMA and high satisfaction with the convenience, privacy and ease of managing their abortion at home. The sample responding were broadly equivalent to the whole population receiving telemedicine. No patient reported that they were unable to consult privately. The majority (1035, 83%) of patients reported preferring the telemedicine pathway, with 824 (66%) indicating that they would choose telemedicine again if COVID-19 were no longer an issue.ConclusionsTelemedicine EMA is a valued, private, convenient and more accessible option that is highly acceptable for patients seeking an abortion, especially those for whom in-clinic visits are logistically or emotionally challenging. Evidence that this pathway would be a first choice again in future for most patients supports the case to make telemedicine EMA permanent.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document