Lessons Learned from Fukushima Daiichi Accident and current situation of surrounding area

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (0) ◽  
pp. C08102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya MIZOKAMI
Keyword(s):  
Current Situation ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Surrounding Area ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

Fukushima Two Year Processing Update

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark S. Denton ◽  
Josh Mertz
Keyword(s):  
Natural Environment ◽  
Earth Quake ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Surrounding Area ◽  
Radioactive Materials ◽  
Nuclear Station ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
Perfect Storm

On March 11, 2011, now two years ago, the magnitude 9.0 Great East Japan earth quake, Tohoku, hit off the Fukushima coast of Japan. This was one of the most powerful earthquakes in recorded history and the most powerful one known to have hit Japan. The ensuing tsunami devastated a huge area resulting in some 25,000 persons confirmed dead or missing. The perfect storm was complete when the tsunami then found the four-reactor, Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Station directly in its destructive path. Some 2 million people were evacuated from a fifty mile radius of the area and evaluation and cleanup began. A tremendous effort has been made, by many nationalities, since this time to restore this damaged plant and surrounding area and to return a great deal of the residents to their homes and farm lands. While most of the outcome of this unprecedented natural and manmade disaster was negative, both in Japan and worldwide, there have been some extremely valuable lessons learned and new emergency recovery technologies and systems developed to cope with the aftermath of this disaster. This paper describes new technology developed to selectively remove radioactive materials dangerous to workers, local citizens, and the natural environment from seawater used to cool the damaged reactors at Fukushima. As always, the mother of invention is necessity.

Post-Fukushima Research and Development Strategies and Priorities for Water Cooled Reactor Technology Development

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Yamada ◽  
Abdallah Amri ◽  
Lyndon Bevington ◽  
Pal Vincze
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Development Strategies ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Member States ◽  
North East ◽  
Severe Accidents ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

The Great East Japan Earthquake and the subsequent tsunami on 11 March 2011 initiated accident conditions at several nuclear power plants (NPPs) on the north-east coast of Japan and developed into a severe accident at the Fukushima Daiichi NPP, which highlighted a number of nuclear safety issues. After the Fukushima Daiichi accident, new research and development (R&D) activities have been undertaken by many countries and international organizations relating to severe accidents at NPPs. The IAEA held, in cooperation with the OECD/NEA, the International Experts’ Meeting (IEM) on “Strengthening Research and Development Effectiveness in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant” at IAEA Headquarters in Vienna, Austria, 16–20 February 2015. The objective of the IEM was to facilitate the exchange of information on these R&D activities and to further strengthen international collaboration among Member States and international organizations. One of the main conclusions of the IEM was that the Fukushima Daiichi accident had not identified completely new phenomena to be addressed, but that the existing strategies and priorities for R&D should be reconsidered. Significant R&D activities had been already performed regarding severe accidents of water cooled reactors (WCRs) before the accident, and the information was very useful for predicting and understanding the accident progression. However, the Fukushima Daiichi accident highlighted several challenges that should be addressed by reconsidering R&D strategies and priorities. Following this IEM, the IAEA invited several consultants to IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 12–14 May 2015, and held a meeting in order to discuss proposals on possible IAEA activities to facilitate international R&D collaboration in relation to severe accidents and how to effectively disseminate the information obtained at the IEM. The IAEA also held Technical Meeting (TM) on “Post-Fukushima Research and Development Strategies and Priorities” at IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 15–18 December 2015. The objective of this meeting was to provide a platform for experts from Member States and international organizations to exchange perspectives and information on strategies and priorities for R&D regarding the Fukushima Daiichi accident and severe accidents in general. The experts discussed R&D topic areas that need further attention and the benefits of possible international cooperation. This paper discusses lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi accident based on the presentations and discussions at the meetings mentioned above, and identifies the needs for further R&D activities to develop WCR technologies to cope with Fukushima Daiichi-type accidents.

Risk Communication in the Food Field

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (sp) ◽  
pp. 598-602
Author(s):  
Hideaki Karaki ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Risk Communication ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Accurate Information ◽  
Contaminated Food ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
The Government ◽  
The U.S

The first BSE case in Japan was found in 2001. The BSE risk in Japan was small and the measures taken by the government successfully prevented the spread of BSE. However, because consumers did not have accurate information, they did not trust the government and refused to consume beef. Based on the lessons learned, the government enacted the Food Safety Basic Act in 2003, and risk communication in the food field was started. In 2003, the first BSE case was found in the U.S. that were supplying nearly one third of the beef consumed in Japan, and the government banned beef import from the U.S. The BSE risk in the U.S. was also small and it was possible to resume imports of beef after the appropriate measures. Despite the government efforts of risk communication, consumers rejected the resumption of imports. In 2011, food was contaminated with radioactive substances discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Although government eliminated the contaminated food from the market, some consumers rejected all of the agricultural products of the Fukushima region, again a failure of risk communication. Here, the current situation and problems of the risk communication in Japan will be described.

Performance degradation of candidate accident-tolerant cladding under corrosive environment

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumihisa Nagase ◽  
Kan Sakamoto ◽  
Shinichiro Yamashita
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Fission Products ◽  
Zirconium Alloys ◽  
Performance Degradation ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Light Water Reactor ◽  
Fuel Cladding ◽  
Power Station ◽  
Light Water ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

AbstractLight-water reactor (LWR) fuel cladding shall retain the performance as the barrier for nuclear fuel materials and fission products in high-pressure and high-temperature coolant under irradiation conditions for long periods. The cladding also has to withstand temperature increase and severe loading under accidental conditions. As lessons learned from the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station, advanced cladding materials are being developed to enhance accident tolerance compared to conventional zirconium alloys. The present paper reviews the progress of the development and summarizes the subjects to be solved for enhanced accident-tolerant fuel cladding, focusing on performance degradation under various corrosive environmental conditions that should be considered in designing the LWR fuel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document