Fukushima Daiichi - 2011 : Nuclear disaster : Lessons learned : Where we stand in India

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
HiteshN Shah ◽  
Rajesh Rallapali
Keyword(s):  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Nuclear Disaster ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

scholarly journals RoboCup Rescue Robot and Simulation Leagues

AI Magazine ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Levent Akin ◽  
Nobuhiro Ito ◽  
Adam Jacoff ◽  
Alexander Kleiner ◽  
Johannes Pellenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
State Of The Art ◽  
The State ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Maturity Level ◽  
Rescue Robot ◽  
Nuclear Disaster ◽  
Robocup Rescue ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

The RoboCup Rescue Robot and Simulation competitions have been held since 2000. The experience gained during these competitions has increased the maturity level of the field, which allowed deploying robots after real disasters (for example, Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster). This article provides an overview of these competitions and highlights the state of the art and the lessons learned.

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster

2019 ◽  
pp. 155-206
Author(s):  
Noriko Hikosaka Behling ◽  
Thomas G. Behling ◽  
Mark C. Williams ◽  
Shunsuke Managi
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Disaster ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

Use of a Geographic Information System (GIS) in the Medical Response to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nagata ◽  
Yoshinari Kimura ◽  
Masami Ishii
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Geographic Information System ◽  
Medical Association ◽  
Disaster Response ◽  
Geographic Information ◽  
Nuclear Disaster ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Event Information ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

AbstractThe Great East Japan Earthquake occurred on March 11, 2011. In the first 10 days after the event, information about radiation risks from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant was unavailable, and the disaster response, including deployment of disaster teams, was delayed. Beginning on March 17, 2011, the Japan Medical Association used a geographic information system (GIS) to visualize the risk of radiation exposure in Fukushima. This information facilitated the decision to deploy disaster medical response teams on March 18, 2011.Nagata T, Kimura Y, Ishii M. Use of a geographic information system (GIS) in the medical response to the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(2):1-3.

Fukushima Two Year Processing Update

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark S. Denton ◽  
Josh Mertz
Keyword(s):  
Natural Environment ◽  
Earth Quake ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Surrounding Area ◽  
Radioactive Materials ◽  
Nuclear Station ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi ◽  
Perfect Storm

On March 11, 2011, now two years ago, the magnitude 9.0 Great East Japan earth quake, Tohoku, hit off the Fukushima coast of Japan. This was one of the most powerful earthquakes in recorded history and the most powerful one known to have hit Japan. The ensuing tsunami devastated a huge area resulting in some 25,000 persons confirmed dead or missing. The perfect storm was complete when the tsunami then found the four-reactor, Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Station directly in its destructive path. Some 2 million people were evacuated from a fifty mile radius of the area and evaluation and cleanup began. A tremendous effort has been made, by many nationalities, since this time to restore this damaged plant and surrounding area and to return a great deal of the residents to their homes and farm lands. While most of the outcome of this unprecedented natural and manmade disaster was negative, both in Japan and worldwide, there have been some extremely valuable lessons learned and new emergency recovery technologies and systems developed to cope with the aftermath of this disaster. This paper describes new technology developed to selectively remove radioactive materials dangerous to workers, local citizens, and the natural environment from seawater used to cool the damaged reactors at Fukushima. As always, the mother of invention is necessity.

Mobility of radioactive cesium in soil originated from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster: application of extraction experiments

2014 ◽  
Vol 304 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Kikawada ◽  
Masaaki Hirose ◽  
Atsushi Tsukamoto ◽  
Ko Nakamachi ◽  
Takao Oi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radioactive Cesium ◽  
Nuclear Disaster ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

Post-Fukushima Research and Development Strategies and Priorities for Water Cooled Reactor Technology Development

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumi Yamada ◽  
Abdallah Amri ◽  
Lyndon Bevington ◽  
Pal Vincze
Keyword(s):  
Research And Development ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Development Strategies ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Member States ◽  
North East ◽  
Severe Accidents ◽  
Fukushima Daiichi

The Great East Japan Earthquake and the subsequent tsunami on 11 March 2011 initiated accident conditions at several nuclear power plants (NPPs) on the north-east coast of Japan and developed into a severe accident at the Fukushima Daiichi NPP, which highlighted a number of nuclear safety issues. After the Fukushima Daiichi accident, new research and development (R&D) activities have been undertaken by many countries and international organizations relating to severe accidents at NPPs. The IAEA held, in cooperation with the OECD/NEA, the International Experts’ Meeting (IEM) on “Strengthening Research and Development Effectiveness in the Light of the Accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant” at IAEA Headquarters in Vienna, Austria, 16–20 February 2015. The objective of the IEM was to facilitate the exchange of information on these R&D activities and to further strengthen international collaboration among Member States and international organizations. One of the main conclusions of the IEM was that the Fukushima Daiichi accident had not identified completely new phenomena to be addressed, but that the existing strategies and priorities for R&D should be reconsidered. Significant R&D activities had been already performed regarding severe accidents of water cooled reactors (WCRs) before the accident, and the information was very useful for predicting and understanding the accident progression. However, the Fukushima Daiichi accident highlighted several challenges that should be addressed by reconsidering R&D strategies and priorities. Following this IEM, the IAEA invited several consultants to IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 12–14 May 2015, and held a meeting in order to discuss proposals on possible IAEA activities to facilitate international R&D collaboration in relation to severe accidents and how to effectively disseminate the information obtained at the IEM. The IAEA also held Technical Meeting (TM) on “Post-Fukushima Research and Development Strategies and Priorities” at IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, Austria, 15–18 December 2015. The objective of this meeting was to provide a platform for experts from Member States and international organizations to exchange perspectives and information on strategies and priorities for R&D regarding the Fukushima Daiichi accident and severe accidents in general. The experts discussed R&D topic areas that need further attention and the benefits of possible international cooperation. This paper discusses lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi accident based on the presentations and discussions at the meetings mentioned above, and identifies the needs for further R&D activities to develop WCR technologies to cope with Fukushima Daiichi-type accidents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document