scholarly journals Elastic Stress Analysis Method for Pressure Vessels Composed of Thin Shells and an Axisymmetric Body Subjected to Internal Pressure

1978 ◽  
Vol 44 (387) ◽  
pp. 3681-3688
Author(s):  
Masahiko KISHI ◽  
Naoyoshi UCHIYAMA
Author(s):  
Frode Tjelta Askestrand ◽  
Ove Tobias Gudmestad

Several codes are currently available for design and analysis of pressure vessels. Two of the main contributors are the American Society of Mechanical Engineers providing the ASME VIII code, Ref /4/ and the Technical Committee for standardization in Brussels providing the European Standard, Ref /2/. Methods written in bold letters will be considered in the discussion presented in this paper. The ASME VIII code, Ref /4/, contains three divisions covering different pressure ranges: Division 1: up to 200 bar (3000 psi) Division 2: in general Division 3: for pressure above 690 bar (10000 psi) In this paper the ASME division 2, Part 5, “design by analysis” will be considered. This part is also referred to in the DNV-OS-F101, Ref /3/, for offshore pressure containing components. Here different analysis methods are described, such as: Elastic Stress Analysis Limit Load Analysis Elastic Plastic Analysis The Elastic Stress Analysis method with stress categorization has been introduced to the industry for many years and has been widely used in design of pressure vessels. However, in the latest issue (2007/2010) of ASME VIII div. 2, this method is not recommended for heavy wall constructions as it might generate non-conservative analysis results. Heavy wall constructions are defined by: (R/t ≤ 4) with dimensions as illustrated in Figure 1. In the case of heavy wall constructions the Limit Load Analysis or the Elastic-plastic method shall be used. In this paper focus will be on the Elastic-plastic method while the Limit Load Analysis will not be considered. Experience from recent projects at IKM Ocean Design indicates that the industry has not been fully aware of the new analysis philosophy mentioned in the 2007 issue of ASME VIII div.2. The Elastic Stress Analysis method is still (2012) being used for heavy wall constructions. The NS-EN 13445-3; 2009, Ref /2/, provides two different methodologies for design by analysis: Direct Route Method based on stress categories. The method based on stress categories is similar to the Elastic Stress Analysis method from ASME VIII div. 2 and it will therefore not be considered in this paper.


1981 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Stanley ◽  
T D Campbell

Very thin cylindrical pressure vessels with torispherical end-closures have been tested under internal pressure until buckles developed in the knuckles of the ends. These were prototype vessels in an austenitic stainless steel. The preparation of the ends and the closed test vessels is outlined, and the instrumentation, test installation, and test procedure are described. Results are given and discussed for three typical ends (diameters 54, 81, and 108in.; thickness to diameter ratios 0.00237, 0.00158, and 0.00119). These include measured thickness and curvature distributions, strain data and the derived elastic stress indices, and pole deflection measurements. Some details of the observed time-dependent plasticity (or ‘cold creep’) are given. Details of two types of buckle that developed eventually in the vessel ends are also reported.


1981 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-111
Author(s):  
D. P. Updike

Elastic stress analysis of a right angle tee branch pipe connection of two pipes of identical diameter and thickness connected through 45-deg chamfer corner sections is developed for internal pressure loading. Stresses in the crotch portion of the vessel are determined. These results are presented in the form of a table of factors useful for rapid calculation of approximate values of the peak stresses. The existence of a structurally optimum size of chamfer is demonstrated.


Author(s):  
Yang-chun Deng ◽  
Gang Chen

To save material, the safety factor of pressure vessel design standards is gradually decreased from 5.0 to 2.4 in ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes. So the design methods of pressure vessel should be more rationalized. Considering effects of material strain hardening and non-linear structural deformation, the elastic-plastic stress analysis is the most suitable for pressure vessels design at present. This paper is based on elastic-plastic theory and considers material strain hardening and structural deformation effects. Elastic-plastic stress analyses of pressure vessels are summarized. Firstly, expressions of load and structural deformation relationship were introduced for thin-walled cylindrical and spherical vessels under internal pressure. Secondly, the plastic instability for thin-walled cylindrical and spherical vessels under internal pressure were analysed. Thirdly, to prevent pressure vessels from local failure, the ductile fracture strain of materials was discussed.


Author(s):  
Daniel Peters ◽  
Adam P. Maslowski

This paper is to give an overview of the major revisions pending in the upcoming 2015 edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section VIII Division 3, Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels, and potential changes being considered by the Subgroup on High Pressure Vessels (SG-HPV) for future editions. This will include an overview of significant actions which will be included in the upcoming edition. This includes action relative to test locations in large and complex forgings, in response to a report from the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) report of a failed vessel in Illinois. This will also include discussion of a long term issue recently completed on certification of rupture disk devices. Also included will be a discussion of a slight shift in philosophy which has resulted in the linear-elastic stress analysis section being moved to a Non-Mandatory Appendix and discussion of potential future of linear-elastic stress analysis in high pressure vessel design.


1993 ◽  
Vol 115 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Skopinsky

This paper presents the numerical approach for the stress analysis of the intersecting shells. For a systematic study of this problem, the classification of the model joints is introduced. Stress analysis has been made with the application of the finite element method based on the modified mixed formulation. The developed special-purpose computer program SAIS is used for elastic stress analysis of the model joints of the intersecting shells. Comparison of the calculated and experimental results for ORNL-1 model are presented for internal pressure and moment loadings. The parametric study of the model joints of the intersecting cylindrical shells under internal pressure loading was performed. The presented results show the effects of changing various geometric and angular parameters on the maximum effective stresses in the shells.


1967 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Pickett ◽  
S. C. Grigory

The bases for ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, fatigue evaluation procedures, the fracture mechanics approach to fatigue life analysis, and the notch stress analysis method are reviewed. Fatigue life predictions are compared with the results of materials, model, and full size pressure vessel tests performed for PVRC and AEC. These tests were made in response to the research objectives established by ASME Special Committee to Review Code Stress Basis in 1958. A proposed design procedure based on the notch stress analysis method and experimental results is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document