A focused update on preventing ceramic fractures in hip arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (8) ◽  
pp. 897-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Konan ◽  
S. Alazzawi ◽  
B-H. Yoon ◽  
Y-H. Cha ◽  
K-H. Koo

Ceramic bearings have several desirable properties, such as resistance to wear, hardness, and biocompatibility, that favour it as an articulating surface in hip arthroplasty. However, ceramic fracture remains a concern. We have reviewed the contemporary literature, addressing the factors that can influence the incidence of ceramic bearing surface fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:897–901.

2019 ◽  
pp. 112070001988959
Author(s):  
Young-Kyun Lee ◽  
Ki-Choul Kim ◽  
Byung-Ho Yoon ◽  
Tae-Young Kim ◽  
Yong-Chan Ha ◽  
...  

Background: Despite improvements in the mechanical properties of alumina ceramics, the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with contemporary ceramic bearings in young patients remains a matter of concern. We evaluated the results of cementless THA with the use of the delta ceramic bearing, and determined the prevalence of osteolysis, squeaking, and ceramic fracture in patients aged < 30 years at mid-term. Methods: From March 2008 to January 2012, 76 consecutive patients (91 hips), younger than 30 years, underwent cementless THA with Delta ceramic bearings. In each follow-up, the clinical evaluation including noise and radiological evaluations were recorded. Results: Among them, 72 patients (86 THAs) were followed-up for a minimum of 5 years (mean 70.8; 60−95.9 months). There were 44 men (47 hips) and 28 women (39 hips). The mean age at the time of the index arthroplasty was 25.9 (16−30) years and the mean preoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) was 59.4 (23−79) points. HHS improved to 96.3 (64−100) points at the final follow-up evaluation. 8 hips (9.3%) exhibited grinding or squeaking. No hip had aseptic loosening and no hip was revised. No osteolysis was detected around any acetabular or femoral components. Conclusions: Our results suggest that cementless THA with the use of Delta ceramic bearing provides satisfactory results without osteolysis or ceramic fracture in patients aged <30 years at a mid-term follow-up. Clinical Trials.gov Protocol Registration System (trial no. NCT01838096).


2005 ◽  
Vol 441 (&NA;) ◽  
pp. 151-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A D???Antonio ◽  
William N Capello ◽  
Michael T Manley ◽  
Marybeth Naughton ◽  
Kate Sutton

2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Jung Kim ◽  
Sung-Chan Ki ◽  
Kyung-Ho Park ◽  
Yoon-Hong Kim ◽  
Young-Yool Chung

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (2) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Hexter ◽  
S. M. Hislop ◽  
G. W. Blunn ◽  
A. D. Liddle

Aims Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Different bearing surface materials have different surface properties and it has been suggested that the choice of bearing surface may influence the risk of PJI after THA. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate of PJI between metal-on-polyethylene (MoP), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP), and ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings. Patients and Methods Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched for comparative randomized and observational studies that reported the incidence of PJI for different bearing surfaces. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility, evaluated risk of bias, and performed data extraction. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel–Haenzel method and random-effects model in accordance with methods of the Cochrane group. Results Our search strategy revealed 2272 studies, of which 17 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. These comprised 11 randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The overall quality of included studies was high but the observational studies were at high risk of bias due to inadequate adjustment for confounding factors. The overall cumulative incidence of PJI across all studies was 0.78% (1514/193 378). For each bearing combination, the overall incidence was as follows: MoP 0.85% (1353/158 430); CoP 0.38% (67/17 489); and CoC 0.53% (94/17 459). The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the three bearing combinations in terms of risk of PJI. Conclusion On the basis of the clinical studies available, there is no evidence that bearing choice influences the risk of PJI. Future research, including basic science studies and large, adequately controlled registry studies, may be helpful in determining whether implant materials play a role in determining the risk of PJI following arthroplasty surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:134–42.


1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1459-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAEK RIM YOON ◽  
SUNG MAN ROWE ◽  
SUNG TAEK JUNG ◽  
KWANG JIN SEON ◽  
WILLIAM J. MALONEY

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document