scholarly journals Walking ability after total hip replacement. A comparison of gait analysis in unilateral and bilateral cases

1992 ◽  
Vol 74-B (1) ◽  
pp. 53-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Wykman ◽  
E Olsson
2003 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.G Benedetti ◽  
E Montanari ◽  
F Catani ◽  
G Vicenzi ◽  
A Leardini

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-466
Author(s):  
Sadiq J. Hamandi ◽  
Marwa Azzawi ◽  
Waleed Abdulwahed

Total hip replacement (THR) is an elective surgical procedure with the primary indication being pain relief. The aim of this study is to analyze gait dynamics for patients after they underwent a unilateral THR surgery and compare it with normal parameters. To investigate the gait dynamics a gait analysis was performed on five patients after they underwent a unilateral THR surgery; only two of them were examined before the surgery. The gait analysis was performed using a digital video camera with two force plates. Kinematics data were obtained from 2D trajectories of seven passive markers using SkillSpector software. MATLAB software has been used for inverse dynamics computation. General gait parameters, Harris Hip Score, joints’ angles, forces, moments and powers were obtained during gait cycle. It was found that the average of improvement in Harris Hip Score (for four patients who were examined 1.5, 2.5, 3 and 9 months after surgery) is 61.8 points, which is an indication of pain relief. In the other hand, the general gait parameters were found slightly lower than normal after THR surgery. The average hip reaction force was found to be 2.988 N/BW, which is within normal range. Also, the average of maximum hip extension and maximum hip flexion angles were found to be 25.69 and -13.524 degree respectively, which both are within normal ranges. Furthermore, hip, knee and ankle moments and powers results showed some abnormality. Therefore as a conclusion, patient satisfaction and functional improvement are not related to general gait parameter. And it is not unusual that gait mechanics improvement would not reach normal after months of recovery. Also, the results of gait dynamics which are from the engineer’s perspective are compatible with Harris Hip Score, which is from the physician’s perspective, in quantifying surgical results and subsequent recovery progress.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 767-775
Author(s):  
Luis Mendiolagoitia ◽  
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez ◽  
Irene Crespo ◽  
Miguel del Valle ◽  
Hugo Olmedillas

Author(s):  
James Donaldson ◽  
Richard Carrington

♦ Hip Dysplasia• Despite screening programs, a large number of patients are affected by dysplastic hips and their sequelae• An understanding of anatomical abnormalities is crucial• Appropriate techniques and implants make arthroplasty feasible• Complications are significantly higher than standard primary hip replacements♦ Protrusio Acetabuli• Technical difficulties include inadequate medial wall and restoring offset, hip centre and leg lengths• Neck may need to be cut in-situ; bone graft is usually necessary and ideally should be taken from the femoral head• Antiprotrusio cages or custom implants may be needed in cases with excessive bone loss♦ Arthrodesed hip to total hip replacement• Careful evaluation of the gluteal muscles is mandatory and predicts final walking ability and patient satisfaction• Long-term effectiveness of total hip replacement in ankylosed hips is satisfactory but there is a higher complication rate


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grainne Colgan ◽  
Mike Walsh ◽  
Damien Bennett ◽  
John Rice ◽  
Timothy O’Brien

1992 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1194
Author(s):  
Jong Chul Ahn ◽  
Ja Woong Koo ◽  
Joo Chul Ihn

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alistair M. Ewen ◽  
Su Stewart ◽  
Alan St Clair Gibson ◽  
Shankar N. Kashyap ◽  
Nick Caplan

2022 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 103488
Author(s):  
A.J. FitzPatrick ◽  
G.W. Rodgers ◽  
J.W. Fernandez ◽  
G.J. Hooper

2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101 ◽  
Author(s):  

Introduction The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) currently recommends the use of total hip replacement (THR) for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in patients who meet certain mobility, cognitive and health criteria. Methods A multicentre prospective audit was conducted within a defined geographic region to assess current practice and variation in provision of THR for displaced intracapsular hip fractures. Results A total of 879 patients with hip fractures, admitted to 8 acute trauma units, were included in this study. Of 462 patients with displaced intracapsular hip fractures, 169 fulfilled the NICE criteria for THR. THR was performed for only 49 of (29%) the eligible patients. There was significant variation in THR provision between the eight units (0% to 50% THR usage, p<0.001). There were statistically significant differences in age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade, abbreviated mental test score and walking ability prior to the injury between patients who underwent fixation, THR or hemiarthroplasty (all p≤0.05). There was a significantly increased chance of not undergoing THR if a patient was older than 77 years (median age for the THR eligible cohort; relative risk [RR]: 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8–22.0, p<0.001). There was also a trend for this with patients who were ASA grade 3 compared with ASA grade 1 or 2 (RR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.0–7.3, p=0.06). The surgeons gave multifactorial reasons for not performing THR in eligible patients. Conclusions There is significant variation in the provision of THR for eligible hip fracture patients, which is influenced by both patient demographics and the unit to which a patient is admitted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document